Comparing Clinical Decision-making of AI Technology to a Multi-professional Care Team in ECBT for Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting up to 300 million people globally. Despite its high prevalence and debilitating effects, only one-third of patients newly diagnosed with depression initiate treatment. Electronic cognitive behavioural therapy (e-CBT) is an effective treatment for depression and is a feasible solution to make mental health care more accessible. Due to its online format, e-CBT can be combined with variable therapist engagement to address different care needs. Typically, a multi-professional care team determines which combination therapy is the most beneficial to the patient. However, this process can add to the costs of these programs. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been proposed to offset these costs. Therefore, this study aims to determine a cost-effective method to decrease depressive symptoms and increase treatment adherence to e-CBT. This will be done by comparing AI technology to a multi-professional care team when allocating the correct intensity of care for individuals diagnosed with depression. This study is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial recruiting individuals (n = 186) experiencing depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). The degree of care intensity a participant will receive will be randomly decided by either: (1) a machine learning algorithm (n = 93), or (2) an assessment made by a group of healthcare professionals (n = 93). Subsequently, participants will receive depression-specific e-CBT treatment through the secure online platform, OPTT. There will be three available intensities of therapist interaction: (1) e-CBT; (2) e-CBT with a 15-20-minute phone/video call; and (3) e-CBT with pharmacotherapy. This approach aims to accurately allocate care tailored to each patient's needs, allowing for more efficient use of resources.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable depression
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 18, 2024
October 1, 2024
3 years
December 5, 2022
October 16, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score
Scale of 0-3 per question, 0 = not at all, 3 = nearly every day, higher score = worse
week 0, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) Score
Scale of 0-3 per question, 0 = better, 3 = worse
week 0, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up.
Change in Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D) Score
Scale of 0-5 per question, 0 = better, 5 = worse
week 0, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
Artificial Intelligence Allocation
EXPERIMENTALAllocation of treatment intensity by the proposed AI algorithm will be based on the machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) of textual data provided by participants and their PHQ-9 score collected through a pre-treatment screening module called the Triage Module. This module, developed by the research team, (1) provides psychoeducation on the effects of psychotherapy, (2) collects PHQ-9 scores, and (3) asks participants six open-ended questions regarding their mental health history, their experiences with mental health disorders, and what mental health difficulties they are currently facing. Based on the participant's answers to the open-ended questions, a variable called "Symptomatic Score" will be calculated using the NLP algorithm.
Healthcare Team Allocation
ACTIVE COMPARATORAllocation of treatment intensity by the multi-professional healthcare team will be based on the following criteria: 1. The severity of MDD symptoms (using DSM-5 criteria). 2. Mental health factors (prior treatments and responses, current and past psychotic/manic episodes, current and past suicidal/homicidal ideation/attempts, family mental health history, past psychiatric history, and hospital admissions). 3. Medical factors (current medical conditions and medications, personal and family medical history). 4. Social factors (support system and living situation, and occupational, social, and personal functional impairment).
Interventions
The participant will submit their weekly homework and receive personalized feedback from their assigned therapist on OPTT. The feedback adds customization by acknowledging the participant's experiences in the past week and ensures the participant has understood the CBT concepts.
In addition to the e-CBT program (see 1 above), the participant will receive a weekly phone/video call from their assigned therapist. The goal is to build on the therapeutic relationship and to add personalization with direct verbal encouragement. This phone/video call is limited to a one-time, 15-20 minutes call each intervention week.44 The purpose is to check with the patient on their treatment progress. The secure call will either be a phone or video (via Microsoft Teams) call, depending on the preference of the patient.
In addition to the e-CBT program (see 1 above), the participant will receive standard pharmacotherapy following DSM-5 guidelines. A pharmacotherapy allocation system has been developed (Figure 1; Figure 2) that follows clinical guidelines. All medications will be prescribed by a psychiatrist on the research team. All medications are a part of the clinical standard of care. The medications will be provided to the participant through the normal process of receiving medication (i.e., pharmacy). Participants allocated to the e-CBT + Phone Call + Pharmacotherapy arm will begin the pharmacotherapy optimization process at the same time as they begin the e-CBT program. Oversight of medication in the e-CBT + Pharmacotherapy arm will be conducted by a psychiatrist on the team who will make a judgement regarding whether to alter the medications. This will not require any additional study visits/time commitment for the participants in this arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with MDD by a trained research assistant according to the criteria outlined in the DSM-5
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Ability to speak and read English
- Having consistent and reliable access to the internet
You may not qualify if:
- Active psychosis
- Acute mania
- Severe alcohol, or substance use disorder
- Active suicidal or homicidal ideation
- Currently receiving psychotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G3, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nazanin Alavi, MD FRCPC
nazanin.alavitabari@kingstonhsc.ca
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- To ensure blinding, all participants will complete the intake assessment by the healthcare team (Arm 1) and the Triage Module (Arm 2). Only the relevant data (i.e., Arm 1: intake assessment vs. Arm 2: Triage Module) will be analyzed depending on the treatment arm that the participant is randomly assigned to.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2022
First Posted
December 13, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 5 years post-study completion
- Access Criteria
- Available upon request
Open-access publication