Pain Education Program in the Sport Population
Effects of the Pain Education Program in the Sport Population
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the effects of a pain neuroscience education program in pain perception, wellness and pain catastrophizing of youth athletes. For this, an experimental study with an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG) is designed. During 12 weeks of the 2022-2023 season, CG will receive a self-care education program, with information about health habits in the sport (rest, nutrition, body care and recovery). Meanwhile, IG will also receive a pain neuroscience education program, with information about biological, psychological and perceptual aspect of pain in the sports context. The study will be developed in the Sport High Performance Centre of Balearic Islands, from January to May. All athletes from this sports centre will be invited to participate in the study throughout an e-mail invitation from their sport regional federation. Prior to the beginning of the study, all participants will sign the inform consent. The Ethical Committee of the local university approved this study (280CER22). One week before intervention period, all athletes will be required to complete questionnaire about sociodemographic and sportive data (age, sex, and sport experience). Body mass and height will be also evaluated. Also, all the athletes will be required to complete three questionnaires about pain level, wellness and pain catastrophizing. Pain level and wellness will be evaluated prior to the start of the intervention and weekly, until finishing the intervention period. The pain catastrophizing level will be evaluated before and after the intervention period of the study. We hypothesized that those athletes who receive the pain neuroscience education program will increase wellness and decrease pain level and catastrophizing perception compared to those athletes who received a self-care educational program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2023
CompletedOctober 21, 2024
March 1, 2023
Same day
December 1, 2022
October 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Wellness level
It is composed by seven questions about wellness, perceived effort, training volume. Wellness was assessed throughout four questions about the subjective perception of the quality of sleep, the amount of stress, the level of perceived fatigue, mood and perceived muscle damage. Each question is individually scored from 1 ("Very, very low, or very, very good") to 5 ("Very, very high, or very, very bad"), being 25 the maximal punctuation.
Change from baseline and between group differences in wellness during and after the intervention period of 12 weeks
Pain level
Pain intensity is assessed by using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst imaginable pain). In case of pain existence, anatomical location, duration (days), sports practice affection (yes/no) were also collected
Change from baseline and between group differences in pain during and after the intervention period of 12 weeks
Pain catastrophizing level
It is designed to evaluate the catastrophizing level of athletes throughout the Pain Catastrophism Scale (PCS). The PCS assesses catastrophic level associated to pain experience through thirteen 4-points Likert items (from 0, not at all, to 4, all the time). Apart from global Catastrophism, PCS evaluates four subscales regarding rumination, helplessness, and magnification. The maximal score is 50 points.
Change from baseline and between group differences in pain catastrophizing after the intervention period of 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group will receive a pain neuroscience education program (once time per month, during 4 months). This program will include information about biological, psychological and perceptual aspects of pain in the sport context.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will receive a self-care education program (once time per month, during 4 months). This program will include information about health habits in the sport.
Interventions
1. Types of pain (peripherical and central pain) 2. Pain as information. 3. Benign and harmful pain 4. Psychological factors and pain in sport (Injuries, catastrophizing and pain)
1. The importance of resting 2. Nutritional habits 3. Recovery techniques for athletes 4. Principles of stretching, strengthening and endurance training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to have at least 14 years old
- to have at least 2 years of experience in the sport
You may not qualify if:
- to have sustained an injury during the previous 6 months to start of the study
- to have sustained a surgery during the previous 12 months to start of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sport High Performance Center of Balearic Islands
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07009, Spain
Related Publications (7)
O'Sullivan K, O'Sullivan PB, Gabbett TJ. Pain and fatigue in sport: are they so different? Br J Sports Med. 2018 May;52(9):555-556. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098159. Epub 2017 Oct 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 29051168BACKGROUNDVicente-Mampel J, Gargallo P, Bautista IJ, Blanco-Gimenez P, de Bernardo Tejedor N, Alonso-Martin M, Martinez-Soler M, Baraja-Vegas L. Impact of Pain Neuroscience Education Program in Community Physiotherapy Context on Pain Perception and Psychosocial Variables Associated with It in Elderly Persons: A Ranzomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911855.
PMID: 36231171BACKGROUNDWatson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, Dixon J, Atkinson G, Cooper K, Martin DJ. Pain Neuroscience Education for Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1140.e1-1140.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
PMID: 30831273BACKGROUNDAfzal Z, Mansfield CJ, Bleacher J, Briggs M. RETURN TO ADVANCED STRENGTH TRAINING AND WEIGHTLIFTING IN AN ATHLETE POST-LUMBAR DISCECTOMY UTILIZING PAIN NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION AND PROPER PROGRESSION: RESIDENT'S CASE REPORT. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Sep;14(5):804-817.
PMID: 31598418BACKGROUNDMaguire N, Chesterton P, Ryan C. The Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education on Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Clinical Recommendations Toward Athletes With Chronic Pain. J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Jul 1;28(5):438-443. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0212. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
PMID: 29405811BACKGROUNDHooper SL, Mackinnon LT. Monitoring overtraining in athletes. Recommendations. Sports Med. 1995 Nov;20(5):321-7. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199520050-00003. No abstract available.
PMID: 8571005BACKGROUNDScrimshaw SV, Maher C. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Oct;24(8):501-4. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.118208.
PMID: 11677548BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2022
First Posted
December 9, 2022
Study Start
February 3, 2023
Primary Completion
February 3, 2023
Study Completion
May 12, 2023
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share