NCT05632822

Brief Summary

The reason of failure of weaning from mechanical ventilation is that their respiratory loads exceeding the capacity of their respiratory muscles. The electric activity of diaphragm (EADI) allows quantification of the neural respiratory drive to the diaphragm. The aim of this study is to evaluate diaphragmatic ultrasound related parameters and electric activity of diaphragm (EADI) during SBT and postural changes to predict weaning outcome.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2022

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 1, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Weaning FailureDiaphragm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • EADI ( diaphragm electrical activity)

    Utilizing NAVA catheter, the EADI allows quantification of the neural respiratory drive to the diaphragm.

    30 minutes since SBT was conducted

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Diaphragm Neurodisplacement Efficiency

    30 minutes since SBT was conducted

  • Neuroventilatory Efficiency

    30 minutes since SBT was conducted

Study Arms (2)

SBT failure

The SBT was considered to be a failure if at least one the following criteria was present: (1) blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of \<90 % with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of≥50 %; (2) acute respiratory distress (RR≥40/min, agitation, cyanosis); (3) systolic arterial blood pressure of ≥180 mmHg; (4) cardiac arrhythmias; (5) respiratory acidosis \[pH\<7.32 with an arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) of ≥50 mmHg\].

SBT success

If none of these failure criteria was present, the SBT was considered as successfully completed.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients were intubated and ventilated for at least 48 h, who need to conduct weaning protocol.

You may qualify if:

  • years old Patients with acute respiratory failure and endotracheal intubation Invasive ventilator time ≥48 hours Switched to auxiliary ventilation mode and have weaning plan.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe neuromuscular diseases Patients treated with muscle relaxants Patients who have been or are about to be discontinued from life support Patients with esophageal and fundus varicose veins, digestive tract perforation or gastric tube insertion after upper digestive tract surgery contraindicated Pregnant patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Diao S, Li S, Dong R, Jiang W, Wang C, Chen Y, Wang J, He S, Wang Y, Du B, Weng L. The diaphragmatic electrical activity during spontaneous breathing trial in patients with mechanical ventilation: physiological description and potential clinical utility. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 May 30;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03077-8.

Study Officials

  • Li Weng, Dr

    Director of department

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Shitong Diao, Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2022

First Posted

December 1, 2022

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion

January 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 1, 2023

Last Updated

December 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations