NCT05623423

Brief Summary

Evaluation of clinical performance of class IV restoration using organically modified ceramic (ORMOCER) in comparison to a Methacrylate Based Composite Resin: A randomized clinical trial

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 21, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 30, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

class IV restorationORMOCERmethacrylate based composite resin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Shade match

    measured by Modified USPHS

    T1: 1 week (baseline)

  • Shade match

    measured by Modified USPHS

    T2: 3 months

  • Shade match

    measured by Modified USPHS

    T3: 1 year.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • a) Retention rate

    T1: 1 week (baseline)

  • a) Retention rate

    T2: 3 months

  • a) Retention rate

    T3: 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Organically Modified Ceramic (ORMOCER) Resin Composite.

EXPERIMENTAL

(Admira Fusion, Voco GmbH, Germany)

Other: (Admira Fusion, Voco GmbH, Germany)

Methacrylate Based Composite

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

(Ceram.X Spectra ST, Dentsply Sirona, UK)

Other: Methacrylate Based Composite

Interventions

cavity margins will be extended to the proximal area, incisal edge, facial and lingual surfaces All enamel margins will be beveled at a 45° angle to the external cavosurface.(approximately 0.5-2.0 mm) An impression for the upper anterior teeth will be taken to produce a silicon palatal index The proximal margins of the restorations will be achieved using the Unica anterior matrix teeth will be etched using 37% phosphoric acid gel for 30 s then rinsed with air water for 20 s A single coat of universal bond cured using and LED light curing unit for 10 s Using the chosen enamel shade of the ORMOCER Resin Composite a thin layer (0.5-1 mm) Unica matrix will used to produce the proximal margins of the restorations Contouring, finishing and polishing of the restoration will be done Dental floss and finishing strips will be used Rubber dam will then be removed and occlusion will be checked using an articulating paper

Organically Modified Ceramic (ORMOCER) Resin Composite.

The exact same steps as in the intervention will be done but using the chosen shades of Methacrylate Based Composite Resin. (Ceram.X Spectra ST, Dentsply Sirona, UK)

Methacrylate Based Composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • participant:
  • Age of patient (18-40) years old.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • Teeth:
  • Having no active pulpal or periodontal conditions.
  • Normal Occlusion.
  • Able to return for follow-up assessments as illustrated by the examiners. -

You may not qualify if:

  • participant:
  • Patients with Edge-to-Edge occlusion.
  • Patients with high caries index.
  • Patients with uncontrolled para-functional habits (e.g. bruxism or clenching).
  • Patients with inadequate oral hygiene.
  • Patients with periodontal or gingival conditions.
  • Patients with orthodontic appliances.
  • Patients with spontaneous pain or sensitivity to percussion
  • Pregnant Patients -

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo university

Cairo, 00202, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Silva MA, Pleffken PR, Rangel PM, Fernandes VV Jr, Di Nicolo R, Torres CR. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):258-66. doi: 10.2341/11-397-C. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

    PMID: 23110580BACKGROUND
  • Blum SL, Horn M, Olms C. A comparison of intraoral spectrophotometers-Are there user-specific differences? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Sep;30(5):442-448. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12407. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

    PMID: 30144376BACKGROUND
  • Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):E1-11. doi: 10.2341/12-160-C. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

    PMID: 23215545BACKGROUND
  • Demirci M, Tuncer S, Sancakli HS, Tekce N, Baydemir C. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities. Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):261-271. doi: 10.2341/16-358-C. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

    PMID: 29533716BACKGROUND
  • Frese C, Wohlrab T, Soliman S, Hahn B, Busch C, Babai A, Krastl G, Wolff D. A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition - Survival and Quality Outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):573-580. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45514.

    PMID: 33491402BACKGROUND
  • Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 2.

    PMID: 22664565BACKGROUND
  • Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Ustunkol I, Berber A. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results. Oper Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):E102-E110. doi: 10.2341/15-286-C.

    PMID: 28682704BACKGROUND
  • Llena C, Fernandez S, Forner L. Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1071-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1850-z. Epub 2016 May 16.

    PMID: 27183827BACKGROUND
  • Rajeev V, Arunachalam R, Nayar S, Arunima PR, Ganapathy S, Vedam V. "Ormocer an innovative technology": A replacement for conventional cements and veneer? A comparative in vitro analysis. Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):58-63. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_113_16.

    PMID: 28435367BACKGROUND
  • Ribeiro JS, Peralta SL, Salgado VE, Lund RG. In situ evaluation of color stability and hardness' decrease of resin-based composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Sep;29(5):356-361. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12319. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

    PMID: 28737281BACKGROUND
  • Romero MF, Haddock FJ, Freites AG, Brackett WW, Brackett MG. Restorative Technique Selection in Class IV Direct Composite Restorations: A Simplified Method. Oper Dent. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):243-8. doi: 10.2341/15-158-T. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

    PMID: 26919082BACKGROUND
  • Ruschel VC, Martins MV, Bernardon JK, Maia HP. Color Match Between Composite Resin and Tooth Remnant in Class IV Restorations: A Case Series. Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):460-466. doi: 10.2341/17-132-S. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

    PMID: 29547347BACKGROUND
  • Sebold M, Lins RBE, Sahadi BO, Santi MR, Martins LRM, Giannini M. Microtensile Bond Strength, Bonding Interface Morphology, Adhesive Resin Infiltration, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Placed Using Different Adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2021 Oct 1;23(5):409-420. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2000221.

    PMID: 34549924BACKGROUND
  • Torres C, Augusto MG, Mathias-Santamaria IF, Di Nicolo R, Borges AB. Pure Ormocer vs Methacrylate Composites on Posterior Teeth: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2020 Jul 1;45(4):359-367. doi: 10.2341/19-079-C.

    PMID: 32053457BACKGROUND
  • van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0287-z. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

    PMID: 19504133BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Mostafa Abdulhameed, Professor

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Investigator, data entry & corresponding author B.D.S. October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (2017). Teaching Assistant at MSA University, 6th Of October, Egypt.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2022

First Posted

November 21, 2022

Study Start

November 30, 2022

Primary Completion

December 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 30, 2023

Last Updated

June 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations