Shade Match, Marginal Adaptation and Patient Satisfaction of VITA ENAMIC multiColor Versus IPS e.Max CAD Veneers
1 other identifier
interventional
21
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
It is assumed that there will be no difference in shade match, marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction between VITA ENAMIC multiColor and IPS e.max CAD anterior laminate veneers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 1, 2021
February 1, 2021
1 year
January 17, 2021
February 24, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
shade match
measured by Modified United States Public Health Service criteria (USPHS criteria). Score Alpha (A): matches tooth, Bravo (B): acceptable mismatch, Charlie (C): unacceptable mismatch
immediately after restoration delivery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
marginal adaptation
immediately after restoration delivery
patient satisfaction
immediately after restoration delivery
Study Arms (2)
VITA ENAMIC multiColor anterior laminate veneers
EXPERIMENTALIPS e.max CAD anterior laminate veneers
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
VITA ENAMIC multiColor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-55 years, are able to read and sign the informed consent document.
- Patients who are physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures.
- Patients with no active periodontal or pulpal diseases and have teeth with good restorations.
- Patients with complaints related to the esthetics in the upper or lower teeth (e.g. discoloration, fracture that does not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
- Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Patient with non-vital teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2021
First Posted
March 1, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
April 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02