The Use of Low-Dose Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Masseter Muscle to Treat Sleep Bruxism
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Botulinum Toxin Injection Into the Masseter Muscle for the Treatment of Nocturnal Bruxism: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Botulinum toxin (BOTOX®) injections into the masseter muscle are an effective treatment for nocturnal bruxism, with several trials using various dosages of botulinum toxin for this purpose. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of injecting 10MU of botulinum toxin A (BTXA) into the masseter muscle to reduce nocturnal bruxism, the sample will randomly divided into 2 groups. In the injection group, Patients will inject with 10 MU of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX® - Allergan Inc. - Dublin - Ireland) per side at two sites into the masseter muscle bilaterally. In this Placebo group, patients will prick twice at the inferior prominent part of the masseter muscle observed using the stinger pen used in the blood glucose meter. The evaluation will make by Electromyography (EMG) analysis, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2022
CompletedNovember 17, 2022
November 1, 2022
6 months
November 5, 2022
November 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in the electromyographic recorded values
EMG signals will record with Matrix EP Light EMG (Micromed, Via Giotto, Mogliano Veneto, Italy) with four channels. The recorded signals will amplify sampled at 1024 Hz, and the acquired data will analyze with System Plus Evaluation software (Micromed, Via Giotto, Mogliano Veneto, Italy). The acquisitions will perform twice with the rest position of the mandible (RPM) for 10 seconds, in maximal intercuspal position (MIP) for five seconds and maximal teeth clenching (MTC) with 10-mm thick cotton rolls between the posterior teeth for five seconds, bilaterally, and the values obtained will be averaged.
Assessment will be done before the injection (T0) and then at 2 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months after the injection (T3)
Change in the perception of pain
A visual analog scale (VAS) will be used for this assessment. A line of 100 mm in length will be used, and the patient will ask to put a mark on the line that reflects her/his perceived pain; the scores of the scale will be determined by measuring the distance in mm from the beginning to the point indicated by the patient (point (0): no pain and point (100): the highest levels of pain).
Assessment will be done before the injection (T0) and then at 2 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months after the injection (T3)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time to first observation of positive effects
2 week
Loss of effectiveness and side effects
4 month
Study Arms (2)
Injection group
EXPERIMENTALIn this group, patients will be injected with 10 MU of botulinum toxin type A in the masseter muscle.
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this group, patients will prick twice in the masseter muscle.
Interventions
100 MU of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX® - Allergan Inc. - Dublin - Ireland) were diluted in 2ml of saline. Patients were injected with 10 MU of BTXA per side at two sites into the masseter muscle bilaterally. The first site was the inferior prominent part of the masseter muscle observed when the subject was asked to clench, and the other site was 5 mm below the first point
patients were pricked twice at the inferior prominent part of the masseter muscle observed using the stinger pen used in the blood glucose meter; it is less painful and provides psychological benefits, instead of injecting the physiological saline into the muscle to avoid the severe pain without a benefit to the patient which would not conform to the ethical standards.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Moderate to severe pain in the masseter muscles during clinical examination.
- Age range between 18 and 40 years.
- Tooth-grinding sounds corroborated by family members or caregivers.
- Attrition in occlusal surface of posterior teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- Loss two posterior teeth or more (except for third molars).
- Fixed or movable prosthodontics for more than four dental units.
- Advanced malocclusion (Class II occlusion Model II - deep bite - open bite).
- Temporomandibular disorders.
- Pain in the orofacial region.
- Insomnia.
- Known botulinum toxin allergy.
- Pregnancy.
- Neuromuscular disease.
- Bleeding disorders.
- Antibiotic therapy, pulmonary disease that produced coughing during sleep.
- Infectious skin lesion at the site of the injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Damascus
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (6)
Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Winocur E, Lobbezoo F. Management of sleep bruxism in adults: a qualitative systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):862-74. doi: 10.1111/joor.12322. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
PMID: 26095208BACKGROUNDCarra MC, Huynh N, Lavigne G. Sleep bruxism: a comprehensive overview for the dental clinician interested in sleep medicine. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Apr;56(2):387-413. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2012.01.003.
PMID: 22480810BACKGROUNDLavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jul;35(7):476-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01881.x.
PMID: 18557915BACKGROUNDLobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, de Leeuw R, Manfredini D, Svensson P, Winocur E. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/joor.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
PMID: 23121262BACKGROUNDSellin LC, Thesleff S. Pre- and post-synaptic actions of botulinum toxin at the rat neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1981 Aug;317:487-95. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013838.
PMID: 6273549BACKGROUNDTan EK, Jankovic J. Treating severe bruxism with botulinum toxin. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Feb;131(2):211-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0149.
PMID: 10680389BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zaed Ghassan Shehri, DDS
Department of Maxillofacial and oral surgery, Damascus University, Syria.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Issam Alkhouri, DDS,MSc,PhD
Department of Maxillofacial and oral surgery, Damascus University, Syria.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ibrahim Haddad, MSc,PhD
Department of Basic Sciences, Damascus University, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2022
First Posted
November 17, 2022
Study Start
March 15, 2021
Primary Completion
September 15, 2021
Study Completion
February 10, 2022
Last Updated
November 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share