Study Stopped
The Steering Committee decided on 22/09/2025 to end the project, due to persistent issues: enrolment suspended because of supply shortages and the arrival of alternative treatments, as well as the end of a key supply agreement.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Injection of Botulinum Toxin A vs Scopolamine Patches in the Treatment of Drooling in Children With Cerebral Palsy
TOXSIALO
Evaluation of the Long-term Efficacy of the Injection of Botulinum Toxin A Into the Salivary Glands Versus Scopolamine Patches in the Treatment of Drooling in Children Over 4 Years Old With Cerebral Palsy.
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Cerebral palsy is the first cause of motor disability in developed countries. It is associated with altered motor function but also with mental, sensorial and behavior deficiencies. Drooling frequently occurs in children with cerebral palsy (37 to 58%). It causes multiple medical and social complications which can all increase disability and reduce quality of life for the patients and their family. Drooling treatments are various and includes orofacial rehabilitations, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin A and B salivary gland injections. Surgeries could also be used, but their benefits are often outweighed by the risk.
- Orofacial rehabilitation is firstly recommended, even if few studies evaluated its efficacy.
- Medication by Scopoderm®, a cutaneous anticholinergic drug, is frequently used in spite of frequent side effects and a lack of evidence regarding efficacy.
- Botulinum toxin salivary gland injections (Botox®) were shown to be effective in reducing the severity of drooling consequences for the patient quality of life up to 12 months after the injections (Reid 2008). A recent survey carried showed that treatment by Botox® injection would be preferred by professional to Scopoderm® patch, because of better tolerance and efficacy, even if Scopoderm® remained more used by professionals (Chaleat-Valayer 2016). However, a Cochrane review (Walshe 2012) concluded that there is 1) no strong consensus regarding assessment or the timing of all treatments 2) not enough efficacy studies with high level of evidence, 3) mostly efficacy studies vs placebo or no intervention 4) a lack of long term treatment assessment 5) a lack of studies on the patient quality of life. Our study will be a comparative randomized clinical trial with an active control arm. The hypothesis is that therapeutic treatment of drooling in children with cerebral palsy consisting of a standardized rehabilitation treatment associated with a botulinum toxin A injection (Botox®) in the salivary glands is more effective than the same rehabilitation treatment associated with a treatment by scopolamine patches (Scopoderm®). The main outcome will be assessed 15 months after initiation of treatment to evaluate long-term effectiveness. Patients from both arms of the trial will received rehabilitation, in order to compare treatment efficacy as it is done in real conditions of treatment. The efficacy of the treatment will be assessed on the impact of the drooling perceived by the patients and their family rather than on the measure of salivary production, as recommended (Walshe 2012).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2022
Typical duration for phase_3
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 22, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.4 years
July 31, 2018
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Drooling Impact Scale (DIS scale)
The DIS scale is a questionnaire of 10 questions with a score of 100 points which will be completed by the patient's entourage (family and/or caregivers). This scale has a good validity and sensitivity to changes in the context of the evaluation of the drooling in children with CP, with a score difference of 10 points considered as clinical significant.
after 15 months of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
DIS scale
at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment
Drooling severity
at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months of treatment
Clinical complications of the drooling
at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Botox® injection arm
EXPERIMENTALBotox® injection in salivary glands will be performed one month after inclusion. It will be performed with one injection point per gland (parotids and submandibulars).
Scopoderm® patches arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopoderm® patches will be initiated one month after inclusion. The patches will be renewed every 3 days, alternating behind each ear
Interventions
Botox® injection in salivary glands will be performed one month after inclusion. It will be performed with one injection point per gland (parotids and submandibulars)
Scopoderm® patches will be initiated one month after inclusion. The patches will be renewed every 3 days, alternating behind each ear.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 4 to 18 years old,
- Cerebral palsy with pathological drooling,
- Significant impact of drooling on the children (DIS score ≥40),
- Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme,
- At least one of the parents understanding and speaking French,
- Written consent form signed by both parents
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of surgery for drooling,
- Contraindication to the anesthetic or sedation,
- Contraindication to one of the treatments studied (glaucoma, myastenia),
- Swallowing disorder (to saliva) or absence of spontaneous swallowing reflex not investigated by nasoscopy
- On-going or programmed orthodontic treatment over the study period.
- Untreated oro-mandibular dystonia (isolated lingual dystonia accepted)
- Untreated bruxism
- Untreated clinical gastro esophageal reflux
- Untreated dental inflammatory condition (dental caries, gingivitis…)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
CHU d'Angers
Angers, France
CHU-Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - HCL
Bron, France
CHU- Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU-Grenoble
Grenoble, France
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues
Lyon, 69322, France
AP-HM
Marseille, France
APFESEAN Nantes
Nantes, France
CHU-Nimes
Nîmes, France
Centre médico- infantile
Romagnat, France
Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice
Saint-Maurice, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sandrine TOUZET, MD
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2018
First Posted
August 6, 2018
Study Start
April 27, 2022
Primary Completion
September 22, 2025
Study Completion
September 22, 2025
Last Updated
January 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share