TeleEducation for Implementing a Clinical Practice Guideline For Amputees
TEFICA
Effectiveness of a Telehealth-based Strategy to Improve the Implementation of the Clinical Practice Guide for Lower Limb Amputees by Neurovascular Disease and Trauma: Intervention Trial Randomised by Clusters
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The publication of a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) is often not enough for its correct use in the field of health care. There are barriers to the implementation of the CPG recommendations, including those related to the lack of knowledge or skills on the part of health service providers. Strategies have been proposed to improve the implementation of the CPGs through interventions with different levels of effectiveness, such as the use of reminders, informative meetings, sending educational material, audits, among others. Some of these interventions can be carried out through Telehealth strategies, that is, with remote services. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Telehealth program to improve the implementation of the Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis and preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative treatment of the amputee, the prescription of the prosthesis and comprehensive rehabilitation, through strategies to publicize the recommendations included in the CPG and train doctors, reducing the barriers related to the lack of knowledge of the CPG. For this, two groups of institutions that provide health services in Antioquia will be compared, randomized according to two interventions: the socialization of the recommendations of the CPG for amputees, against a combined strategy of education through a Telehealth platform and the delivery of educational material. Compliance with prioritized recommendations of the CPG will be evaluated, related to surgical techniques, perioperative practices, the prescription of prosthetic components and referral to services that allow the comprehensive rehabilitation of the person with amputation. Additionally, the theoretical knowledge of the doctors of each participating institution before and after the interventions will be evaluated through a written test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 7, 2022
November 1, 2022
2 years
December 26, 2019
November 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Rate of patients who received two stages amputation in severe infection
First stage for infection control and second stage for remodeling and definitive closure of the stump
1 week
Rate of patients who received perioperative analgesia
Perioperative epidural analgesia in patients who are going to be amputated from lower limbs to decrease acute pain of the stump and phantom limb in the period
72 hours
Rate of patients who received prophylactic antibiotics
Antibiotic use (Cefazolin or Vancomycin in case of allergy to beta-lactams) from 2 hours before the incision until 24 hours after the amputation
2 hours before the incision until 24 hours after the amputation
Rate of patients who received transfemoral amputation instead of knee disarticulation
Transfemoral amputation instead of knee disarticulation
24 hours
Rate of patients who received myodesis
Myodesis (Suture of the adductor muscles to the bone through transosseous tunnels)
24 hours
Rate of patients who received immediate postoperative prosthesis
verify the order of the immediate prosthesis and if it was manufactured
24 hours
Rate of patients who received a SACH foot
Adapt a solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot for amputations of the lower limbs above or below the knee and a low expected level of activity (K1 or K2)
3 to 6 months
Rate of patients who received an articulated foot
adapt an articulated foot or a dynamic response foot in people with greater activity requirements (K3 / K4) or who must use the prosthesis on irregular or inclined surfaces
3 to 6 months
Rate of patients who received a prosthetic knee for above knee amputees
Monocentric knee with manual locking or a knee with load brake in the K1 and monocentric or polycentric knee of fluid control in the K2, K3, K4 was prescribed
3 to 6 months
Rate of patients who received a prosthetic knee for knee disarticulated amputees
mechanical polycentric knee was prescribed for disarticulation in K1 and polycentric fluid control for K2, K3, K4
3 to 6 months
Rate of patients who received occupational therapy
occupational rehabilitation and ergonomic adaptations
3 to 6 months
Rate of patients who received comprehensive Rehabilitation
recommends the implementation of a comprehensive rehabilitation process: cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal, psychosocial, activities of daily living and work
2 weeks to 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Usual Implementation of the Clinical Practice Guideline
OTHERIn this group, all participants (cluster) have access to the clinical practice guideline that has been sent to the office responsible for implementing the guideline in the hospital. Due to the characteristics of the intervention in the control group it does not work as a placebo or a sham intervention.
Tele-education strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORTele-educational program consisting of a virtual course with recommendations from the CPG of lower limb amputees, with three modules: Perioperative, rehabilitation and prostheses
Interventions
Teleducation course, based on the CPG recommendations
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hospital providing medium and high complexity services in Antioquia that are linked or linked to the telehealth network of the University of Antioquia.
- Patients with lower limb amputation due to traumatic, vascular or diabetes mellitus that are treated in the aforementioned institutions.
- Health professionals who use CPG for people with amputation.
- Hospitals, patients and professionals who agree to participate in the project
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who were amputated for other causes not included in the target population of the CPG, such as cancer and congenital.
- Amputee patients under 16 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Antioquia
Medellín, Antioquia, 050031, Colombia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jesús A Plata Contreras
Universidad de Antioquia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Each cluster is conformed by one hospital of middle or higher attention level, the individuals in each cluster don´t know the intervention options, and the outcomes assessor either
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2019
First Posted
November 1, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 20, 2021
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share