Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Heart Evaluation for Patients Requiring Physiological Pacing Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With the aging of society, the use of cardiac pacing in patients with irreversible bradycardia is increasingly widespread. As early as the 1950s, right ventricular pacing (RVP) began to be used in patients with atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, but in fact such pacing could cause ventricular asynchrony, which could lead to long-term myocardial perfusion injury, valvular regurgitation, heart failure, and increased risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The latest guideline recommended reducing the proportion of right ventricular pacing. Additionally, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) has been recommended to improve cardiac function, but only about 30% of patients benefit from it, which may be related to poor left ventricular pacing site and myocardial scarring. In theory, His bundle pacing (HBP) compared with RVP can reduce the risk of functional tricuspid regurgitation when the lead position lies on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve, which may improve the right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure. In 2021, Domenico Grieco et al. explored the effect of HBP on right heart function. After 6 months of follow-up, it was found that HBP improved right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure compared with RVP. At present, there are few discussions on the effect of physiological pacing on right ventricular hemodynamics, and the sample size is small. Internationally, the discussion of the assessment of hemodynamics is limited to non-invasive evaluation (such as echocardiography, ECG, SPECT) The gold standard for right heart hemodynamics evaluation is the measurement of invasive right heart catheterization, and there has been no relevant research so far, so the investigators further designed a study of the effect of physiological pacing on hemodynamics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 29, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.4 years
September 17, 2022
December 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of adverse events after procedure
rehospitalization due to acute heart failure, all-cause mortality, cardiac death
From date of inclusion until the date of documented adverse events, assessed up to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Changes in systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressure by Swan-Ganz catheter from pre-procedure level
5 minutes after ventricular pacing lead implantation
Changes in systolic, diastolic and mean right ventricular pressure by Swan-Ganz catheter from pre-procedure level
5 minutes after ventricular pacing lead implantation
Changes in systolic, diastolic and mean right atrial pressure by Swan-Ganz catheter from pre-procedure level
5 minutes after ventricular pacing lead implantation
Changes in right ventricular global longitudinal strain rate from pre-porcedure level
24 hours post procedure, 1st month, 3rd month, 12th month since procedure
Changes in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion from pre-procedure level
24 hours post procedure, 1st month, 3rd month, 12th month since procedure
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
His bundle pacing group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHBP was performed on the patient, and the detection of the His bundle potential during the procedure is the sign of the success of the procedure. The HB capture threshold was accepted if lower than 3.0 V at 0.42ms.
Left branch bundle pacing group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHBP was performed on the patient, and the detection of the His bundle potential during the procedure is the sign of the success of the procedure. During the procedure, the duration from the pacing signal to the peak of R wave (on V4-V6 lead) is measured as pacing to left ventricular activation time (p-LVAT). An eligible site of left bundle capture was confirmed if selective LBBP was demonstrated by ECG, if p-LVAT shortened abruptly \>10 ms through increasing pacing output, or if p-LVAT stayed shortest and stable at the site.
Right ventricular pacing group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIf we could not achieve an acceptable HB or LBB capture after five attempts of lead positioning or a fluoroscopy exposure time over 30min, the lead was then placed in the RV with traditional approach.
Interventions
All groups were detected with SW catheter by the internal jugular vein before the procedure. After the measurement, the catheter was indwelled, and the pacemaker implantation procedure was started. After ventricular pacing for 5 minutes, the SW catheter measurement was performed again. After the measurement, the SW catheter was withdrawn.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age over 18
- persistent atrial fibrillation patients with uncontrolled heart rate requiring atrioventricular node ablation
- patients with sick sinus syndrome or atrioventricular block eligible for pacemaker implantation
- patients who can understand and sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- age below 18 or over 99
- concomitant diseases that may affect right heart function, including COPD, pulmonary infection, history of pulmonary embolism or right myocardial infarction, myocarditis, systemic disease
- patients with temporary pacemaker implanted
- right heart catheterization contraindications, including acute infection and embolic events
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 210000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yawei Xu
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2022
First Posted
October 12, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10