Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block)
LEAP-Block
1 other identifier
interventional
486
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, randomized controlled study. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of LBBAP on left ventricular function as compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
4.6 years
January 26, 2021
December 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint is the time to a first event of composite outcomes, including all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.
All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy. Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from dual-chamber pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).
Within two years after device implantation
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Rate of the composite outcomes of all-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure
Within 2 years after device implantation
Rate of the composite outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and/or an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.
Within 2 years after device implantation
Rate of the composite outcomes of LVEF <50%, and/or an increase in LVESV ≥15% during follow-up as compared with the value at randomization
Within 2 years after device implantation
The value of LVEF and LVESV assessed by echocardiography at 1-year and 2-year follow-up
24 months
The time to a first event of LVEF <50% and decrease in LVEF by ≥ 10% during 2 years follow-up as compared with the value at randomization.
24 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Pre-existing heart disease based primary outcome
Within 2 years after device implantation
Baseline QRSd based primary outcome
Within 2 years after device implantation
Study Arms (2)
LBBAP group
EXPERIMENTALAV block patients randomized to left bundle branch area pacing
RVP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAV block patients randomized to right ventricular pacing group
Interventions
Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing form for ventricular pacing. In patients received LBBAP, the pacing lead will be placed at left bundle branch area to achieve narrow paced QRS duration.
Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. The pacing lead was placed in the apex or septum of right ventricle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a. Adult patients aged 18-90;
- b. AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)\> 40%, including (a)Third-degree AV block; (b) Second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP\>40%; (d)Symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG ≥ 250ms;
- c. The subject is able to receive a pectoral implant;
- d. The subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol;
- e. The subject is expected to remain available for follow-up visits at the study centers.
- f. Subject or authorized legal guardian or representative has signed and dated the study Subject Informed Consent
You may not qualify if:
- a. Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF\<50%);
- b. Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons;
- c. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation;
- d. Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes;
- e. Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications;
- f. Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease;
- g. Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc), or AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM)vpost (modified) Morrow surgery, (b) ventricular septal defect repair; and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, Chinalead
- Beijing Anzhen Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou Universitycollaborator
- The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical Universitycollaborator
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospitalcollaborator
- TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospitalcollaborator
- Peking Union Medical College Hospitalcollaborator
- Chinese Society of Cardiologycollaborator
- Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai Universitycollaborator
- Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospitalcollaborator
- First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical Universitycollaborator
- Peking University First Hospitalcollaborator
- Beijing Friendship Hospitalcollaborator
- Wuxi People's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029, China
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, China
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300052, China
Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
Related Publications (10)
Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q, Omar R, Yip GW, Hussin A, Fang F, Lam KH, Chan HC, Fung JW. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 26;361(22):2123-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907555. Epub 2009 Nov 15.
PMID: 19915220BACKGROUNDVijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Subzposh FA, Abdelrahman M, Sharma PS, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Ellenbogen KA. Permanent His-bundle pacing: Long-term lead performance and clinical outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
PMID: 29274474BACKGROUNDCho SW, Gwag HB, Hwang JK, Chun KJ, Park KM, On YK, Kim JS, Park SJ. Clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 May;21(5):643-651. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1427. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
PMID: 30734436BACKGROUNDTayal B, Fruelund P, Sogaard P, Riahi S, Polcwiartek C, Atwater BD, Gislason G, Risum N, Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L, Kragholm KH. Incidence of heart failure after pacemaker implantation: a nationwide Danish Registry-based follow-up study. Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3641-3648. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz584.
PMID: 31504437BACKGROUNDHuang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Mao G, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019 Jan;105(2):137-143. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313415. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PMID: 30093543BACKGROUNDAbdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
PMID: 29535066BACKGROUNDVijayaraman P, Dandamudi G. Anatomical approach to permanent His bundle pacing: Optimizing His bundle capture. J Electrocardiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;49(5):649-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
PMID: 27457727BACKGROUNDLi X, Li H, Ma W, Ning X, Liang E, Pang K, Yao Y, Hua W, Zhang S, Fan X. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
PMID: 31048065BACKGROUNDLi X, Qiu C, Xie R, Ma W, Wang Z, Li H, Wang H, Hua W, Zhang S, Yao Y, Fan X. Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1711-1722. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12731. Epub 2020 May 13.
PMID: 32400967BACKGROUNDSharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PMID: 25446158BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Xiaohan Fan, PhD.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2021
First Posted
January 29, 2021
Study Start
November 13, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share