NCT04730921

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, randomized controlled study. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of LBBAP on left ventricular function as compared with traditional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
486

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 13, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2021

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Atrioventricular BlockLeft bundle branch area pacingRight ventricular pacing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary endpoint is the time to a first event of composite outcomes, including all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.

    All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy. Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from dual-chamber pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).

    Within two years after device implantation

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Rate of the composite outcomes of all-cause death and/or hospitalization for heart failure

    Within 2 years after device implantation

  • Rate of the composite outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and/or an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy due to pacing induced heart failure.

    Within 2 years after device implantation

  • Rate of the composite outcomes of LVEF <50%, and/or an increase in LVESV ≥15% during follow-up as compared with the value at randomization

    Within 2 years after device implantation

  • The value of LVEF and LVESV assessed by echocardiography at 1-year and 2-year follow-up

    24 months

  • The time to a first event of LVEF <50% and decrease in LVEF by ≥ 10% during 2 years follow-up as compared with the value at randomization.

    24 months

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Pre-existing heart disease based primary outcome

    Within 2 years after device implantation

  • Baseline QRSd based primary outcome

    Within 2 years after device implantation

Study Arms (2)

LBBAP group

EXPERIMENTAL

AV block patients randomized to left bundle branch area pacing

Device: Left bundle branch area pacing

RVP group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

AV block patients randomized to right ventricular pacing group

Device: Right ventricular pacing

Interventions

Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing form for ventricular pacing. In patients received LBBAP, the pacing lead will be placed at left bundle branch area to achieve narrow paced QRS duration.

LBBAP group

Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. The pacing lead was placed in the apex or septum of right ventricle.

RVP group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a. Adult patients aged 18-90;
  • b. AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)\> 40%, including (a)Third-degree AV block; (b) Second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP\>40%; (d)Symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG ≥ 250ms;
  • c. The subject is able to receive a pectoral implant;
  • d. The subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol;
  • e. The subject is expected to remain available for follow-up visits at the study centers.
  • f. Subject or authorized legal guardian or representative has signed and dated the study Subject Informed Consent

You may not qualify if:

  • a. Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF\<50%);
  • b. Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons;
  • c. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation;
  • d. Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes;
  • e. Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications;
  • f. Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease;
  • g. Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc), or AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM)vpost (modified) Morrow surgery, (b) ventricular septal defect repair; and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Beijing Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029, China

Location

Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

Location

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China

Location

The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University

Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

Location

Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital

Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China

Location

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, China

Location

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300052, China

Location

Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Yu CM, Chan JY, Zhang Q, Omar R, Yip GW, Hussin A, Fang F, Lam KH, Chan HC, Fung JW. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 26;361(22):2123-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907555. Epub 2009 Nov 15.

    PMID: 19915220BACKGROUND
  • Vijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Subzposh FA, Abdelrahman M, Sharma PS, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Ellenbogen KA. Permanent His-bundle pacing: Long-term lead performance and clinical outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

    PMID: 29274474BACKGROUND
  • Cho SW, Gwag HB, Hwang JK, Chun KJ, Park KM, On YK, Kim JS, Park SJ. Clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 May;21(5):643-651. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1427. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

    PMID: 30734436BACKGROUND
  • Tayal B, Fruelund P, Sogaard P, Riahi S, Polcwiartek C, Atwater BD, Gislason G, Risum N, Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L, Kragholm KH. Incidence of heart failure after pacemaker implantation: a nationwide Danish Registry-based follow-up study. Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3641-3648. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz584.

    PMID: 31504437BACKGROUND
  • Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Mao G, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019 Jan;105(2):137-143. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313415. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

    PMID: 30093543BACKGROUND
  • Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

    PMID: 29535066BACKGROUND
  • Vijayaraman P, Dandamudi G. Anatomical approach to permanent His bundle pacing: Optimizing His bundle capture. J Electrocardiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;49(5):649-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

    PMID: 27457727BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Li H, Ma W, Ning X, Liang E, Pang K, Yao Y, Hua W, Zhang S, Fan X. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

    PMID: 31048065BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Qiu C, Xie R, Ma W, Wang Z, Li H, Wang H, Hua W, Zhang S, Yao Y, Fan X. Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1711-1722. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12731. Epub 2020 May 13.

    PMID: 32400967BACKGROUND
  • Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

    PMID: 25446158BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrioventricular BlockHeart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart BlockArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Xiaohan Fan, PhD.

    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2021

First Posted

January 29, 2021

Study Start

November 13, 2020

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations