NCT05552261

Brief Summary

Primary Objective To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy (healing) of OXERVATE® 0.002% (20 mcg/mL) cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution in Stage 1 neurotrophic keratitis (NK) patients who enrolled in the DEFENDO study. Secondary Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of OXERVATE® 0.002% (20 mcg/mL) cenergemin-bkbj ophthalmic solution in terms of corneal sensitivity, Schirmer I test, tear film break-up time (TFBUT), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), and quality of life at 24 and 30 months post-treatment

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 12, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 12, 2024

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 16, 2022

Results QC Date

July 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Stage 1 NKOXERVATE®CenegerminNKDEFENDONGF0120 (original DEFENDO study)NGF0122 (DEFENDO long-term follow-up study)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number/Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Corneal Epithelial Healing at NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) and Remained Healed at Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 Study

    Corneal epithelial at Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study was summarized as a binary goal attainment variable (Yes/No) based on the subset of patients who achieved corneal epithelial healing at Week 8 of the NGF0120, as determined by the Central Reading Center (CRC). Healing was defined as the absence of persistent epithelial staining abnormalities related to disease. The persistence (or worsening) of a staining pattern in the same corneal area was considered a failure in terms of healing.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • Number/Percentage of Patients Who Did Not Achieve Corneal Epithelial Healing at NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) Who Had a Healed Corneal Epithelium at Month 24 and 30 of the NGF0122 Study.

    Corneal epithelial healing at the overall Follow-up Month 24 and Month 30 was summarized as a binary goal attainment variable (Yes/No) based on the subset of patients who did not achieve corneal epithelial healing at Week 8 of the NGF0120, as determined by the Central Reading Center (CRC). Healing was defined as the absence of persistent epithelial staining abnormalities related to disease. Epithelial healing took into consideration the Baseline epithelial staining patterns of each patient and their evolution over time.The persistence (or worsening) of a staining pattern in the same corneal area was considered a failure in terms of healing.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Number/Percentage of Patients With an Improvement in Corneal Sensitivity at NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) Who Still Had Improvement in Corneal Sensitivity at Month 24 and 30 of the NGF0122 Study.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • Number/Percentage of Patients Who Did Not Improved Corneal Sensitivity at NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) and Improved Corneal Sensitivity at Month 24 and 30 of the NGF0122 Study.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • Mean Change in Corneal Sensitivity From NGF0120 Baseline and NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) to Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 Study.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • Change From NGF0120 Baseline and NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) in Schirmer I Scores to Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 Study.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • Change From NGF0120 Baseline and NGF0120 Week 8 (EoT NGF0120=Baseline NGF0122) in TFBUT to Months 24 and 30 of the NGF0122.

    At Month 24 and Month 30 of the NGF0122 study

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Group Long-term follow-up

All eligible patients, after completing enrollment in the original DEFENDO Study, were invited to enter the DEFENDO Long-Term Follow-Up Study (all standard of care permitted), according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Drug: Cenegemin in the DEFENDO Study

Interventions

Cenegemin as administered in the original DEFENDO Study. Long-term safety and efficacy of OXERVATE® 0.002% (20 mcg/mL) cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution administered in Stage 1 Neurotrophic Keratitis (NK) patients enrolled in the original DEFENDO Study (NGF0120 / NCT04485546). No intervention was performed in this follow-up / extension study.

Also known as: OXERVATE®
Group Long-term follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Stage 1 NK

You may qualify if:

  • Previously enrolled in the DEFENDO Study.
  • Satisfied all Informed Consent requirements. The patient and/or their legal representative read, signed, and dated the IRB approved Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures were performed.
  • Had the ability and willingness to comply with study procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Were participating in another study that involved treating the study eye. Participation in non-ocular studies was acceptable provided that the treatment was not considered to be confounding with the DEFENDO Long-Term Follow-up Study, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

New Vision Institute

San Diego, California, 92037, United States

Location

Cincinnati Eye Institute

Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017, United States

Location

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02011, United States

Location

Scheie Eye Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

cenegermin

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Development & Operations
Organization
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Study Officials

  • Flavio Mantelli, MD, PhD

    Dompé

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2022

First Posted

September 23, 2022

Study Start

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion

April 12, 2024

Study Completion

April 12, 2024

Last Updated

November 28, 2025

Results First Posted

November 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations