NCT05543421

Brief Summary

The study is planned as a randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled and sham-controlled parallel trial, in which raters and participants will be blinded to the group selection. A total of 60 participants, meeting the eligibility criteria, will be enrolled in the study and divided randomly into 4 groups (2 experimental ones with active rTMS or iTBS and 2 controls with sham-placebo rTMS or iTBS stimaltions).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

June 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

TMSiTBSMDDRCT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation Change from Baseline to END of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in MADRS scale

    Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation from baseline to end of stimualion measured with MADRS. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    END of stimulation

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation Change from Baseline to 3 months of follow up after end of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in MADRS scale

    Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation from baseline to 3 months follow up after end of stimualion measured with MADRS. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    3 months after end of stimulation

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation Change from Baseline to END of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in HAMD scale

    Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation from baseline to end of stimualion measured with HAMD. The HAMD is a 17-items scale, measuring depression severity, the overall score ranges from 0 to 60, higher score means more severe depression.

    END of stimulation

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation Change from Baseline to 3 months of follow up after end of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in HAMD scale

    Comparison of efficiency of rTMS and iTBS active stimulation from baseline to 3 months follow up after end of stimualion measured with HAMD. The HAMD is a 17-items scale, measuring depression severity, the overall score ranges from 0 to 60, higher score means more severe depression.

    3 months after end of stimulation

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS active and rTMS sham-placebo stimulation Change from Baseline to END of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in MADRS scale

    Comparison of efficiency of rTMS active and rTMS sham placebo stimulation from baseline to end of stimulation measured with MADRS. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    END of stimulation

  • Comparison of efficiency of rTMS active and rTMS sham placebo stimulation from baseline to end of stimulation measured with MADRS

    Comparison of efficiency of iTBS active and iTBS sham-placebo stimulation Change from Baseline to END of stimulation regarded as reduction of symptoms measured in MADRS scale. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    3 months after end of stimulation

Study Arms (4)

rTMS active

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: TMS

rTMS sham

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: TMS

iTBS active

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: TMS

iTBS sham

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: TMS

Interventions

TMSDEVICE

rTMS (30sessions) or iTBS (40sessions)

iTBS activeiTBS shamrTMS activerTMS sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Psychiatric diagnosis (F3X);
  • Symptom severity - total score of the Hamilton Depression Scale a least 17
  • Granting informed consent
  • The possibility for the patient to ensure constant participation in individual sessions and clinical evaluations, in particular in terms of place of residence and travel options
  • years of age.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications to treatments using TMS
  • Lack of informed consent from the patient
  • Documented persistent lack of cooperation in treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wroclaw Medical Univeristy, Department of Psychiatry

Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-367, Poland

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2022

First Posted

September 16, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 30, 2024

Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Locations