NCT05541900

Brief Summary

Suicide-related experiences affect millions of people every year in the United States. Through decades of research, interventions targeting these experiences have developed with varied empirical support. Many of these treatments require regular attendance to in-person sessions with a trained behavioral health professional. Limitations of in-person services have led to the development of digital-based interventions, such as Therapeutic Evaluative Conditioning (TEC). TEC is based in evaluative conditioning principles and is a brief (1-2 minutes) digital intervention designed to increase aversion to self-injurious behaviors while decreasing aversion to the self through a match game-like task. Initial assessment of the intervention demonstrated promising results although treatment effects did not remain over time. Separately, sanctification, or the process through which aspects of life are perceived as having divine character and significance, can come from a theistic or nontheistic background and does not require a belief in a God or higher power to be experienced. When something is discovered as sacred, that sacredness becomes a priority for the individual, initiating motivation to conserve what is viewed as sacred. The primary aim of the current study is to develop and test the effectiveness of an adapted version of TEC designed to increase affinity for sacredness of life and increase the connection to life as mechanisms for decreasing suicide-related experiences. Results will provide insight into the perception of sacredness of life as a potential treatment target and are foundational work in a novel approach to address the public health priority of prevention and treatment of suicide-related experiences.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
104

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 11, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 14, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 14, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 21, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Perceived Sacredness of Life

    Scores on the Perceiving Sacredness of Life scale will be utilized as the main outcome for treatment targets. The Perceiving Sacredness in Life Scale assesses the extent to which an individual perceives life as sacred. The initial section of the scale lists six statements about God: theistic, deistic, pantheistic or panentheistic, agnostic, atheistic, and none of the above. This initial section is designed to orient the individual to answer the remaining 28-items (14 theistic and 14 non-theistic) based on their individual definition of God. Items are rated based on frequency of each experience and scaled from 1 - Never to 5 - Very Often. Items cover nine categories of perceiving sacredness of life, including, in general, nature and creation, time, everyday life, the journey of life, people in general, relationships with people, the self, and qualities or aspects of life. Higher scores indicate a higher perception of sacredness of life.

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • Perceived Sacredness of Life

    Scores on the Perceiving Sacredness of Life scale will be utilized as the main outcome for treatment targets. The Perceiving Sacredness in Life Scale assesses the extent to which an individual perceives life as sacred. The initial section of the scale lists six statements about God: theistic, deistic, pantheistic or panentheistic, agnostic, atheistic, and none of the above. This initial section is designed to orient the individual to answer the remaining 28-items (14 theistic and 14 nontheistic) based on their individual definition of God. Items are rated based on frequency of each experience and scaled from 1 - Never to 5 - Very Often. Items cover nine categories of perceiving sacredness of life, including, in general, nature and creation, time, everyday life, the journey of life, people in general, relationships with people, the self, and qualities or aspects of life. Higher scores indicate a higher perception of sacredness of life.

    One-month following treatment completion

  • Suicide-Related Thoughts and Behaviors

    Responses on an online-version of the Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview - Short Form will assess circumstances around previous suicidal ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The SITBI-SF is a 72-item measure assessing the circumstances around previous suicidal ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The SITBI-SF includes both yes/no questions on presence of suicide-related experiences as well as individual items assessing severity and other circumstances around suicide-related experiences, with higher ratings indicating more severity.

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • Suicide-Related Thoughts and Behaviors

    Responses on an online-version of the Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview - Short Form will assess circumstances around previous suicidal ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The SITBI-SF is a 72-item measure assessing the circumstances around previous suicidal ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The SITBI-SF includes both yes/no questions on presence of suicide-related experiences as well as individual items assessing severity and other circumstances around suicide-related experiences, with higher ratings indicating more severity.

    One-month following treatment completion

  • Modified Affect Misattribution Procedure: Implicit affinity to sacredness of life.

    A modified version of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) will be used to assess for changes in implicit attitudes on the sacredness of life. During each trial, one of the stimuli utilized in the active conditioning paradigm is presented on the screen as an emotional prime (75ms), followed by a blank screen (125ms), an ambiguous Chinese symbol (100ms) and a final blank screen. The participant is instructed to indicate whether they felt the Chinese symbol presented was "pleasant" or "unpleasant". An AMP score is calculated as the proportion of pleasant ratings within a given stimulus category rated as pleasant. For the current study, 48 trials of the AMP will be administered.

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • Modified Affect Misattribution Procedure: Implicit affinity to sacredness of life.

    A modified version of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) will be used to assess for changes in implicit attitudes on the sacredness of life. During each trial, one of the stimuli utilized in the active conditioning paradigm is presented on the screen as an emotional prime (75ms), followed by a blank screen (125ms), an ambiguous Chinese symbol (100ms) and a final blank screen. The participant is instructed to indicate whether they felt the Chinese symbol presented was "pleasant" or "unpleasant". An AMP score is calculated as the proportion of pleasant ratings within a given stimulus category rated as pleasant. For the current study, 48 trials of the AMP will be administered.

    One-month following treatment completion

  • "Death/Life" Implicit Association Test.

    The d-IAT uses reaction time to measure automatic implicit associations with death and life stimuli. Procedures follow those of the original IAT, with participants classifying stimuli representing constructs of "death" and "life", and attributes them to "me" and "not me". A "D" score is calculated for each participant using reaction time. Positive D scores indicate a stronger association between death and self while negative scores represent a stronger association between life and self.

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • "Death/Life" Implicit Association Test.

    The d-IAT uses reaction time to measure automatic implicit associations with death and life stimuli. Procedures follow those of the original IAT, with participants classifying stimuli representing constructs of "death" and "life", and attributes them to "me" and "not me". A "D" score is calculated for each participant using reaction time. Positive D scores indicate a stronger association between death and self while negative scores represent a stronger association between life and self.

    One-month following treatment completion

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Connection to Others

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • Religious and Spiritual Struggles

    After treatment completion (week 4)

  • Reasons for Living

    After treatment completion (week 4)

Study Arms (2)

TEC-Sacredness

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active condition of the intervention. For the active intervention group, the three match types are as follows: (1) a self-related word paired with a life-related stimulus; (2) a sacredness of life-related stimulus paired with a pleasant stimulus; and (3) a neutral stimulus paired with a neutral stimulus.

Behavioral: TEC-Sacredness

TEC-Control

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Control condition of the intervention. The control paradigm maintains the same parameters, however, all three match pairings will be neutral.

Behavioral: TEC-Control

Interventions

TEC-SacrednessBEHAVIORAL

The participant is asked to identify and select the correct match on each trial as quickly as possible. Match pairs (i.e., a self-related word paired with a life-related stimulus, a sacredness of life-related stimulus paired with a pleasant stimulus, and a neutral stimulus paired with a neutral stimulus) are first presented to the participant. A grid is then shown containing one of the match pairs along with distraction stimuli.

TEC-Sacredness
TEC-ControlBEHAVIORAL

The participant is asked to identify and select the correct match on each trial as quickly as possible. Match pairs (i.e., a neutral stimulus paired with a neutral stimulus) are first presented to the participant. A grid is then shown containing one of the match pairs along with distraction stimuli.

TEC-Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English-language Proficiency
  • History of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors and/or elevated on depressive disorder symptoms within the past month, as assessed by an elevated scored (5 or higher) and/or endorsement on Item 9 (on suicide risk) of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001).

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18
  • Unable to consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Florida State Univeristy

Tallahassee, Florida, 32304, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Franklin JC, Fox KR, Franklin CR, Kleiman EM, Ribeiro JD, Jaroszewski AC, Hooley JM, Nock MK. A brief mobile app reduces nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury: Evidence from three randomized controlled trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;84(6):544-57. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000093. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

    PMID: 27018530BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Suicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedSuicideSelf-Injurious Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Anna Gai, MS

    Florida State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctoral Candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Posted

September 15, 2022

Study Start

May 11, 2022

Primary Completion

July 14, 2022

Study Completion

July 14, 2022

Last Updated

September 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no current plan to share IPD. Data sharing must be approved by funding sources.

Locations