Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Cancer Surgery.
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abdominal surgery is usually associated with severe postoperative pain. The transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block is considered an effective means for pain control in such cases. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block is another option for the management of postoperative pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of quadrates lumborum blocks and Transversus abdominis plane blocks for pain management after abdominal cancer surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2023
CompletedSeptember 9, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.2 years
September 6, 2022
September 6, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The total dose of morphine
amount of morphine in mg
in the first 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
visual analog score
postoperatively at 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours
visual analog score
postoperatively 2 hours
visual analog score
postoperatively at 4 hours
visual analog score
postoperatively at 6 hours
visual analog score
postoperatively at 12 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group quadratus lumborum
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe patient will be positioned supine with lateral tilt , and the transducer was placed at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine and moved cranially until the three abdominal wall muscles were clearly identified. The external oblique muscle was followed posterolaterally until its posterior border was visualized . The probe was tilted down to identify a bright hyperechoic line that represented the middle layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. The needle will be inserted in plane from anterolateral to posteromedial. The needle tip was placed between the thoracolumbar fascia and the QL muscle, and after negative aspiration, the correct position of the needle was proved by injection of 5 mL of normal saline to confirm the space with a hypoechoic image and hydrodissection. An injection of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied
Group transversus abdominis plane
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe probe will located between the iliac crest and the lower costal margin in the anterior axillary line at the level of umbilicus, and the layers of abdominal wall were identified (external oblique, internal oblique, and transverse abdominis muscles). In-plane technique was used and the tip of the needle was inserted between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. After negative aspiration (to exclude intravascular injection), 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The same technique will be performed on the other side
Interventions
the patient will be positioned supine with lateral tilt , and the transducer was placed at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine and moved cranially until the three abdominal wall muscles were clearly identified. The external oblique muscle was followed posterolaterally until its posterior border was visualized . The probe was tilted down to identify a bright hyperechoic line that represented the middle layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. The needle will be inserted in plane from anterolateral to posteromedial. The needle tip was placed between the thoracolumbar fascia and the QL muscle, and after negative aspiration, the correct position of the needle was proved by injection of 5 mL of normal saline to confirm the space with a hypoechoic image and hydrodissection. An injection of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was applied
the probe will located between the iliac crest and the lower costal margin in the anterior axillary line at the level of umbilicus, and the layers of abdominal wall were identified (external oblique, internal oblique, and transverse abdominis muscles). In-plane technique was used and the tip of the needle was inserted between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. After negative aspiration (to exclude intravascular injection), 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The same technique will be performed on the other side
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients included in the study, aged 20-60 years,
- with ASA Physical Status Class I and II,
- scheduled for abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- infection at injection site,
- allergy to local anesthetics,
- coagulation disorders,
- physical or mental diseases which could interfere with the evaluation of pain scores
- kidney failure or liver failure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nevert Adel Abdel Ghaffar
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assist. prof. of anesthesia and pain management
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2022
First Posted
September 9, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 15, 2023
Last Updated
September 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09