Peri-operative Rectus Sheath Block Versus TEA Abdominal Surgeries
Peri-operative Rectus Sheath Fentanyl-Levo Bupivacaine Infusion Versus Thoracic Epidural Fentanyl-Levo Bupivacaine Infusion in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgeries With Medline Incision
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) can be considered the gold standard for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgeries, as proved by a lot of number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that TEA was associated with superior postoperative analgesia, better patients' outcomes, reducing (systemic opiate requirements, ileus and pulmonary complications). The rectus sheath block (RSB) is effective for the surgeries that necessitated midline abdominal incisions as local anesthetics instillation will be within the posterior rectus sheath bilaterally providing intense analgesia for the middle anterior wall from the xiphoid process to the symphysis pubis in adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2018
CompletedMarch 9, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.6 years
February 21, 2018
March 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
assessing a change in VAS score with cough
assessing a change in Pain severity by VAS score with cough (0-10) 0=no pain 10=worst pain ever
at 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 hours post operative.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
assessing a change of MAP
at baseline , 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 hours post operative.
Study Arms (2)
TEA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORperi operative thoracic epidural block (TEA) via fentanyl-levo bupivacaine infusion.
RSB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORperi operative rectus sheath block (RSB) via fentanyl-levo bupivacaine infusion.
Interventions
Under complete aseptic precautions and before induction of GA, thoracic epidural catheter was inserted using a 17 gauge, Tuohy epidural needle by a midline approach. T9-T10 interspace was chosen for the injection after skin infiltration by 5 mL of lidocaine 1%. The epidural space was identified by the loss of resistance technique then the catheter was introduced 2 cm into the epidural space, and epidural test dose of 3 mL of lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 adrenaline was injected to exclude vascular or subarachnoid position.
Under aseptic technique, the rectus muscle was imaged with the ultrasound probe, A broadband (5-12 MHz) linear array probe of Sonosite ™ 3000 ultrasound (FUJIFILM, Sonosite EDGE II -UAS) in a transverse orientation at or immediately above the level of the umbilicus, with an imaging depth of 4-6 cm. Inserting the needle: An 18G Tuohy needle was introduced few millimeters from the probe using an in plane technique in an angle of 45 degrees to the skin. (posterior rectus sheath and fascia transversalis). Under direct vision, the needle tip was advanced to the desired position where 20 mL of (levo-bupivacaine 0.25% Fentanyl 30 μg) were injected causing hydro dissection of the rectus muscle away from the posterior rectus sheath. The technique is repeated on the opposite side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult patients, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade II and III, scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery were consecutively enrolled.
You may not qualify if:
- We excluded from the study; patients who refused the study, Patients with coagulopathy, active neurological disease, cutaneous disorders at the epidural insertion site, and who were allergic to the studied medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Arab Republic of Egypt
Asyut, 0020, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alaa A. Elzohry, MD
Principal Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2018
First Posted
March 9, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 20, 2018
Study Completion
February 20, 2018
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03