NCT03546179

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a temporary increase in tidal volume can predict fluid responsiveness in patients receiving a low tidal volume ventilation in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries. The hypothesis of this study is that a temporary increase in tidal volume from 6 to 8 ml/kg would improve the predictability of PVI in patients receiving low tidal volume ventilation in surgical procedures with large fluid shift as hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2018

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 15, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PVI, Tidal volume challenge

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • detection of best cut-off value of ΔPVI6-8 by using tidal volume challenge.

    By Youden index \[sensitivity + (specificity - 1)\]

    2 minutes after performing a "tidal volume challenge"

Secondary Outcomes (35)

  • Detection of sensitivity of PVI6 measured by masimo radical 7 equipment..

    2 minutes before tidal volume challenge when tidal volume of patient is 6ml/kg

  • Detection of specificity of PVI6 measured by masimo radical 7 equipment..

    1 minute before tidal volume challenge when tidal volume of patient is 6ml/kg

  • Detection of best cut off of percentage ΔPVI6-8 measured by masimo radical 7 equipment.

    2 minutes after performing tidal volume challenge

  • Detection of sensitivity of ΔPVI6-8 measured by masimo radical 7 equipment.

    2 minutes after performing tidal volume challenge

  • Detection of sensitivity of percentage ΔPVI6-8 measured by masimo radical 7 equipment.

    2 minutes after performing tidal volume challenge

  • +30 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (13)

  • age

    once when patient is recruited

  • sex

    once when patient is recruited

  • Height

    once when patient is recruited

  • +10 more other outcomes

Interventions

Tidal volume (VT) will be increased from 6 to 8 ml/kg of for one minute and hemodynamic variables, including PVI with 8 ml/kg tidal volume ventilation (PVI8) will be recorded.

After these two baseline hemodynamic measurements, volume expansion will be performed for 10 min using an infusion of balanced crystalloid solution (6ml/kg of predicted body weight).

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients older than 18 years undergoing hepatic, pancreatic or biliary tumor resection

You may qualify if:

  • Patients older than 18 years undergoing hepatic, pancreatic or biliary tumor resection

You may not qualify if:

  • Preoperative cardiac arrhythmias
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Low left ventricular function (ejection fraction \< 40%)
  • Significant valvular heart disease
  • Intra-cardiac shunts
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Fulminant hepatic failure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Liver Institute

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia, 32511, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Tympa A, Theodoraki K, Tsaroucha A, Arkadopoulos N, Vassiliou I, Smyrniotis V. Anesthetic Considerations in Hepatectomies under Hepatic Vascular Control. HPB Surg. 2012;2012:720754. doi: 10.1155/2012/720754. Epub 2012 May 28.

  • Navarro LH, Bloomstone JA, Auler JO Jr, Cannesson M, Rocca GD, Gan TJ, Kinsky M, Magder S, Miller TE, Mythen M, Perel A, Reuter DA, Pinsky MR, Kramer GC. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond). 2015 Apr 10;4:3. doi: 10.1186/s13741-015-0014-z. eCollection 2015.

  • Joshi GP. Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Aug;101(2):601-605. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159171.26521.31.

  • Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Theodoraki K, Tsantoulas D, Contis JC. The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections. Am J Surg. 2004 Mar;187(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.001.

  • Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2000;4(5):282-9. doi: 10.1186/cc710. Epub 2000 Sep 1.

  • Michard F, Schmidt U. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: searching for the Holy Grail. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Aug;97(2):790-1; author reply 791. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00021.2004. No abstract available.

  • Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):415-421. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002183.

Study Officials

  • Magdy K Mohamed Khalil, M.D

    National Liver Institute, Menoufia University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mohamed F Mohamed El-Gayar, M.D

    Faculty of medicine, Fayoum University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Joseph M Botros, M.D

    Faculty of medicine, Fayoum University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Posted

June 6, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion

January 15, 2020

Study Completion

February 15, 2020

Last Updated

July 7, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations