A Fatty Flap Taken From the Double Chin for Chin Enhancement: a New Surgical Technique
A Fatty Flap Sculpted From the Double Chin for a Better Face Profile: an Original Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The double chin is a troublesome component of the lower third of the face. It gives an embarrassing and unpleasant facial appearance to both men and women leading them to ask for liposuction. Moreover, a "receding chin" causes blunting of the cervico-mental angle, a fleshy appearing neck, a disproportion in the profile line of the face with a prominent looking nose, and an irregular mandibular border. This study is about an innovative surgical procedure: Instead of doing liposuction of the double chin, the investigators used the fat of this area as a flap to improve a "receding chin". hence both the double chin and the receding chin are treated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2022
CompletedAugust 25, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.3 years
August 18, 2022
August 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Chin advancement measure
For the objective evaluation: Chin advancement was evaluated by measuring, with a Vernier caliper, the distance between the submental crease and the soft tissue at the pogonion. This distance was taken before and after the surgical procedure. The advancement of the chin ranged from 3,5 to 12 millimeters (mm). This measurement was taken by the investigator during the follow-up appointments. For the subjective evaluation: The results were evaluated on patient reviews and photographic studies (before and after surgery).
The change of chin projection at 6 months after the surgical procedure
Chin advancement measure
For the objective evaluation: Chin advancement was evaluated by measuring, with a Vernier caliper, the distance between the submental crease and the soft tissue at the pogonion. This distance was taken before and after the surgical procedure. The advancement of the chin ranged from 3,5 to 12 millimeters (mm). This measurement was taken by the investigator during the follow-up appointments. For the subjective evaluation: The results were evaluated on patient reviews and photographic studies (before and after surgery).
The change of chin projection at 12 months after the surgical procedure
Chin advancement measure assessing the stability of the result
For the objective evaluation: Chin advancement was evaluated by measuring, with a Vernier caliper, the distance between the submental crease and the soft tissue at the pogonion. This distance was taken before and after the surgical procedure. The advancement of the chin ranged from 3,5 to 12 millimeters (mm). This measurement was taken by the investigator during the follow-up appointments. For the subjective evaluation: The results were evaluated on patient reviews and photographic studies (before and after surgery).
The change of chin projection at 24 months after the surgical procedure
Fat deposits removal in the submental region
This outcome was evaluated on photos (face and profile) before and after surgery. A questionnaire including three levels of satisfaction (not satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied) was completed by the participants concerning the surgical outcomes including the submental change and the chin advancement.
At 6 months after the surgical procedure
Fat deposits removal in the submental region
This outcome was evaluated on photos (face and profile) before and after surgery. A questionnaire including three levels of satisfaction (not satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied) was completed by the participants concerning the surgical outcomes including the submental change and the chin advancement.
At 12 months after the surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The evaluation of the surgical scar
At 6 months after the surgical procedure
The evaluation of the surgical scar
At 12 months after the surgical procedure
Study Arms (1)
A surgical technique for double chin treatment and chin advancement
OTHERthe same surgical technique was performed on 10 participants with their consent. Subplatysmal fat, of the submental region, was dissected from the subcutaneous plan and the platysma muscle, then elevated as a flap to be plicated and turned, then fixed on the muscular layer of the chin. This technique provides both double chin treatment and chin advancement. It improves the profile of the face.
Interventions
Under general anesthesia, an incision was made behind the submental crease followed by the excision of the skin excess. The preplatysmal fatty compartment was individualized through a subcutaneous dissection. Then, the lower part of the preplatysmal fat was cut to start its separation from the platysma muscle, thus obtaining a real vascularized fatty flap. This flap could be folded on itself, then easily turned over to be fixed on the muscular layer of the chin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the presence of a "double chin" with slightly redundant skin and a "receding chin" causing a fleshy appearing neck, and a disproportion in the face profile
You may not qualify if:
- any history of a precedent surgery on the neck, the presence of a traumatic or a burn scar on the cervical region.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Shamban AT. Noninvasive Submental Fat Compartment Treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Dec 14;4(12 Suppl Anatomy and Safety in Cosmetic Medicine: Cosmetic Bootcamp):e1155. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001155. eCollection 2016 Dec.
PMID: 28018773RESULTStrauss RA, Abubaker AO. Genioplasty: a case for advancement osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jul;58(7):783-7. doi: 10.1053/joms.2000.7266.
PMID: 10883694RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
IMEN T MEHRI TURKI, Dr
Teaching hospital Mohamed Tahar Maamouri, nabeul
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2022
First Posted
August 25, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 25, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08