Decisional Conflicts, Health-related QoL and Satisfaction With Care in High-risk cSCC in the Head-neck Region

NCT05482880 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: METC 2018-2918-A-2
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 78
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 2

Brief Summary

Patient reported outcomes in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the head-neck region are an important part of the complex care for these patients. Health-related quality of life, decision conflicts in the choice of treatment and satisfaction with care have not yet been sufficiently studied in this patient group.

Conditions

Squamous Cell Carcinomas; Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck; Skin Cancer; High-Risk Cancer; Quality of Life; Satisfaction, Patient

Keywords

High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; Health-related quality of life; Decisional conflicts; Satisfaction with care; Head-neck region; Multidisciplinary care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

• Decisional conflict

  Decisional conflicts expressed as mean total and domain scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) questionnaire. The DCS questionnaire consist of 16 items related to decision conflicts. Items are given a score value of 0 (strongly agree), 1 (agree), 2 (neither agree or disagree), 3 (disagree) and 4 (strongly disagree). The total score can be calculated by summarize all scores, dividing by 16 and then multiplying by 25. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score correlates with a higher decisional conflict. The 5 domain subscores are: uncertainty (3 items), informed (3 items), values clarity (3 items), support (3 items) and effective decision (4 items). The subscores can be calculated by summarize the (3 or 4) items, dividing by the number of items (3 or 4) and then multiplying by 25. The subscores range from 0 to 100 where a higher score correlates with a higher decisional conflict.

  At the start (before treatment) of the care pathway.

• Health-related quality of life

  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) expressed as mean total/domain scores on the EuroQol five-dimensional (5D) five-level (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L consist of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 response levels (no, slight, moderate, severe or extreme problems) resp. coded from 1 to 5. The EuroQol-visual analogue scale records the overall health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0 to 100). Example: a response of 77 is coded 77. A higher score indicates a better health status).

  At the start (before treatment) of the care pathway.

• Health-related quality of life

  Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) expressed as mean total/domain scores on the EuroQol five-dimensional (5D) five-level (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L consist of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 response levels (no, slight, moderate, severe or extreme problems) resp. coded from 1 to 5. The EuroQol-visual analogue scale records the overall health on a vertical visual analogue scale (0 to 100). Example: a response of 77 is coded 77. A higher score indicates a better health status).

  At 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

• Health-related quality of life

  HRQoL expressed as mean total/domain scores on the Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma QoL (BaSQoL) questionnaire. The BaSQoL consist of 5 scales: behaviour, diagnosis/treatment, worries, appearance and other people. Items are scored: 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (quite a bit), 3 (very much). An average score per scale will be calculated (the sum of all scores within one scale, divided by the number of items) resulting in a scale score of 0 to 3. A higher score indicates a higher influence of skin cancer on daily life.

  At 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

• Satisfaction with care

  Satisfaction with care expressed as mean total and domain scores on the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 (patient satisfaction) questionnaire. The EORTC IN-PATSAT32 is composed of 11 multi-item scales (including doctors' and nurses' interpersonal skills, technical skills, information provision and availability, and other hospital personnel kindness/helpfulness and information giving, waiting time and access) and 3 single item scales (including exchange of information, comfort/cleanliness and general satisfaction). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a high level of satisfaction with care.

  Once during the care pathway: 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

• Difference in decisional conflict outcomes between centers

  At the start (before treatment) of the care pathway.

• Difference in health-related quality of life outcomes between centers

  At the start (before treatment) of the care pathway.

• Difference in health-related quality of life outcomes between centers

  At 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

• Difference in health-related quality of life outcomes between centers

  At 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

• Difference in satisfaction with care outcomes between centers

  At 1 month after completion of the care pathway.

Study Arms (1)

head-neck cutaneous Squamous cell carcinomas

Patients with high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head-neck area receiving regular, multidisciplinary care.

Other: Regular care with additionally administration of questionnaires

Interventions

Regular care with additionally administration of questionnaires OTHER

Patients receiving regular care. In addition, validated questionnaires are administered at two measurement points: 1. after the multidisciplinary consultation, a baseline questionnaire\*, the decision conflict scale and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire are administered by phone. 2. 1 month after completion of the treatment program (care pathway) the EQ-5D-5L, the BaSQoL and the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaires will be administered by phone. Completing the questionnaires takes about 30 minutes each time. \*Baseline questionnaire: gender, age, marital status, education level, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, presence of informal care, stage and treatment of cSCC, history of skin cancer, presence of current other skin cancer, and average travel time to hospital.

head-neck cutaneous Squamous cell carcinomas

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients are selected by the treating physicians from multidisciplinary consultation in the secondary/tertiary centers Maastricht UMC+ and Radboud UMC.

You may qualify if:

• patients diagnosed with a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma located in the head-neck area (including patients with metastatic or recurrence disease)
• requiring a multidisciplinary approach
• assessed at the department of dermatology of Maastricht UMC+ or Radboud UMC OR discussed in the multidisciplinary consultation in Maastricht UMC+ or Radboud UMC
• and for which treatment of the tumor (primary tumor or metastatic/recurrence) takes places in the Maastricht UMC+ of Radboud UMC
• willing to participate voluntarily in the study

You may not qualify if:

• patients younger than 18 years
• patients with inadequate understanding of the Dutch language
• patients with cognitive impairment or otherwise unable to complete the questionnaires

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Maastricht University Medical Center: lead

Study Sites (2)

Radboud UMC

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Location

Maastricht University Medical Center +

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (13)

• Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Frenard C, Harwood CAlpha, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NW, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Middleton MR, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellecani G, Peris K, Saiag P, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Eggermont AMM, Grob JJ; European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 1. epidemiology, diagnostics and prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:60-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

  PMID: 32113941 BACKGROUND

• Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Concetta Fargnoli M, Forsea AM, Frenard C, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Middleton MR, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellecani G, Peris K, Saiag P, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Eggermont AMM, Grob JJ; European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:83-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

  PMID: 32113942 BACKGROUND

• Kallini JR, Hamed N, Khachemoune A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: epidemiology, classification, management, and novel trends. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Feb;54(2):130-40. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12553. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

  PMID: 25428226 BACKGROUND

• Que SKT, Zwald FO, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and staging. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Feb;78(2):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.059.

  PMID: 29332704 BACKGROUND

• Mourouzis C, Boynton A, Grant J, Umar T, Wilson A, Macpheson D, Pratt C. Cutaneous head and neck SCCs and risk of nodal metastasis - UK experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;37(8):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

  PMID: 19713116 BACKGROUND

• Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, Trilling B, Wehner-Caroli J, Rocken M, Breuninger H. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug;9(8):713-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70178-5. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

  PMID: 18617440 BACKGROUND

• Brougham ND, Dennett ER, Cameron R, Tan ST. The incidence of metastasis from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and the impact of its risk factors. J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;106(7):811-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23155. Epub 2012 May 16.

  PMID: 22592943 BACKGROUND

• Schmults CD, Karia PS, Carter JB, Han J, Qureshi AA. Factors predictive of recurrence and death from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a 10-year, single-institution cohort study. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 May;149(5):541-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2139.

  PMID: 23677079 BACKGROUND

• van Egmond S, Wakkee M, Droger M, Bastiaens MT, van Rengen A, de Roos KP, Nijsten T, Lugtenberg M. Needs and preferences of patients regarding basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma care: a qualitative focus group study. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jan;180(1):122-129. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16900. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

  PMID: 29927480 BACKGROUND

• Arts LPJ, Waalboer-Spuij R, de Roos KP, Thissen MRTM, Scheijmans LJ, Aarts MJ, Oerlemans S, Lybeert MLM, Louwman MWJ. Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction with Care, and Cosmetic Results in Relation to Treatment among Patients with Keratinocyte Cancer in the Head and Neck Area: Results from the PROFILES Registry. Dermatology. 2020;236(2):133-142. doi: 10.1159/000502033. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

  PMID: 31434078 BACKGROUND

• Chren MM, Sahay AP, Bertenthal DS, Sen S, Landefeld CS. Quality-of-life outcomes of treatments for cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Jun;127(6):1351-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700740. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

  PMID: 17301830 BACKGROUND

• Wang AY, Palme CE, Wang JT, Morgan GJ, Gebski V, Gilchrist J, Veness MJ. Quality of life assessment in patients treated for metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Jul;127 Suppl 2:S39-47. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113000303. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

  PMID: 23458083 BACKGROUND

• Abedini R, Nasimi M, Noormohammad Pour P, Moghtadaie A, Tohidinik HR. Quality of Life in Patients with Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Implications for Healthcare Education Services and Supports. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1368-y.

  PMID: 29705894 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Skin Neoplasms; Patient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Squamous Cell; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Skin Diseases; Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Health Behavior; Behavior

Study Officials

• K Mosterd, MD, PhD

  Maastricht University Medical Center

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 26, 2022
• First Posted: August 1, 2022
• Study Start: February 28, 2022
• Primary Completion: November 1, 2023
• Study Completion: December 1, 2024
• Last Updated: January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations

NL (2)