EPPIC-Net: Novaremed Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ISA
EN21-01
EPPIC-Net EN21-01 A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of 80 mg Daily of NRD135S.E1 Versus Placebo in Adult and Elderly Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.
2 other identifiers
interventional
127
1 country
26
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the current hard gelatin capsule formulation of NRD135S.E1 80 mg once daily in the treatment of PDPN when administered for 13 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for phase_2
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 19, 2026
October 1, 2025
2.9 years
July 25, 2022
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To demonstrate that NRD135S.E1 80 mg daily is superior to placebo in relieving neuropathic pain associated with PDPN, after 13 weeks' treatment.
Change from Baseline to Week 13 in the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour average pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (abbreviated herein as WAP for weekly average pain). The NRS is a 0-10 scale, with 0 indicating no pain, and 10 being the worst possible pain.
13 weeks
The frequency (i.e. number of participants) with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in the time period defined by first administration of IP until 7 days after the last dose of IP.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is any AE temporally associated with the use of study treatment whether or not considered by the investigator as related to study treatment.
13 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Occurrence of 30% reduction of WAP from Baseline to Week 13.
13 weeks
Occurrence of 50% reduction of WAP from Baseline to Week 13.
13 weeks
Other Outcomes (13)
To assess the effect of NRD135S.E1 in comparison to placebo with respect to Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Short Form 6 (PCS-SF6)
13 weeks
To assess the effect of NRD135S.E1 in comparison to placebo with respect to the Pain, Enjoyment, and General activity scale (PEG).
13 weeks
To assess the effect of NRD135S.E1 in comparison to placebo with respect to the PROMIS Physical Functioning Short-Form 6b
13 weeks
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NRD135S.E1 80mg/day
EXPERIMENTALNRD135S.E1 as a potential treatment for moderate to severe painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). While the activity of NRD135S.E1 has been extensively studied, its molecular target is not known, though it does not appear to work through any of the opioid receptors or molecular pathways currently targeted by available analgesics. The best evidence suggests it may act, at least in part, through modulating the Lyn kinase signaling pathway In clinical studies, NRD135S.E1 has been well tolerated at all dose levels tested in single-dose (up to 1,200 mg) and repeat-dose regimens (up to 300 mg/day over 5 days or 150 mg over 3 weeks), and it has been shown to have predictable pharmacokinetics with dose-dependent increases in exposure.
Matching placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORA matching placebo comparator will be used.
Interventions
The double-blind treatment phase is up to 13 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provides written consent for the EN21-01 ISA. Legally Authorized Representatives (LARs) are not allowed, but impartial witnesses may be utilized as needed for visually impaired participants.
- Patient-reported daily 11-point NRS (for average pain over the last 24 hours) meets the criteria specified in "Appendix B: Blinded Information" during both the 7-day screening and 7-day baseline periods. The algorithm will be assessed centrally.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than nicotine or caffeine) within the 2 years before the Screening visit. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
- Moderate or severe renal impairment, known (documented) or defined as an estimated/calculated creatinine clearance/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula during the screening process. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
- Any of the following conditions related to corrected QT intervals using Fridericia's formula (QTcF):
- A QTcF \> 500 ms prior to starting IP, up to and including the V3 pre-dose ECG.
- A history of the following additional risk factors for torsade de pointes: heart failure, hypokalemia, history or family history of long QT syndrome.
- History of myocardial infarction, other clinically active significant heart disease, or stroke. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
- Participants known to have participated in four or more studies for investigational pain drugs.
- Participants known to be non-responders to more than three previous neuropathic pain medications at adequate doses over at least 4 weeks. Adequate doses (given as total daily doses) are defined as follows: 1,800 mg gabapentin; 300 mg pregabalin; opioid analgesics 60 mg oxycodone equivalent or 200 mg tramadol; 75 mg amitriptyline or equivalent tricyclic antidepressant; 60 mg duloxetine; 150 mg venlafaxine.
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any excipients of the study drug formulation.
- Taking prohibited medications as described in Appendix A, "Prohibited Medications."
- Major depressive episode within the 6 months before screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder within two years. Any of the following conditions related to suicidality:
- Any suicidal ideation with intent, with or without a plan, at screening, i.e., answering "yes" to questions 4 or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Baseline/Screening version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS);
- Answering "yes" on any item of the Suicidal Behavior Section (except for the "non-suicidal self-injurious behavior") of the C-SSRS if this behavior occurred in the past 2 years;
- A lifetime history of suicide attempt (V1).
- Previous known or possible exposure to NRD135S.E1.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaicollaborator
- New York Universitycollaborator
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)collaborator
- James P. Rathmell, MDlead
Study Sites (26)
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92037, United States
South Lake Pain Institute
Clermont, Florida, 34711, United States
SIMEDHealth LLC
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Northwestern Department of Neurology
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Flossmoor)
Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Hazelwood)
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042, United States
NYU Langone Manhattan
New York, New York, 10017, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/Neurological Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14627, United States
Clinical Inquest Center
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45431, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
Low Country Pain Center
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118, United States
American Indian Clinical Trials Research Network
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701, United States
Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Clinicore International
Houston, Texas, 77077, United States
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510, United States
VCU Department of Neurology
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
Related Publications (4)
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, McDermott MP, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA. Placebo and treatment group responses in postherpetic neuralgia vs. painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy clinical trials in the REPORT database. Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 20202753BACKGROUNDTarpey T, Petkova E, Ciarleglio A, Ogden RT. Extracting scalar measures from functional data with applications to placebo response. Stat Interface. 2021;14(3):255-265. doi: 10.4310/20-sii633.
PMID: 34316322BACKGROUNDTarpey T, Petkova E, Lu Y, Govindarajulu U. Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;105(491):968-977. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713.
PMID: 21494314BACKGROUNDVan Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Journal of Statistical Software mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R (Vol. 45). http://www.jstatsoft.org/
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Robinson-Papp, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization assignment will be blinded from study participants, staff from clinical sites, investigators, asset owner, IND sponsors, and/or designees.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2022
First Posted
July 29, 2022
Study Start
September 21, 2022
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No The use of Global Unique Identifiers (GUIDs) allows data to be linked with a given research participant, without revealing any of the participant's identifiable information. All participants in NIH-funded research must have a GUID. This study is using the Biomedical Research Informatics Computing System (BRICS) GUID platform to assign GUIDs. This ID should be generated at the time of Informed Consent since it requires several pieces of patient information (e.g., last name at birth, first name at birth, sex at birth, day, month and year of birth, city and country of birth, etc.). The GUID will be a combination of letters and numbers to form a unique identifier, e.g. TBIAC412JJK. Sites should maintain a list to link the GUID to the participant.