Study Stopped
Study was terminated due to animal toxicity data
Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN)
EMPADINE
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Reducing 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (EMPADINE)
2 other identifiers
interventional
142
15 countries
60
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of EMA401 compared to placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
60 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2020
CompletedOctober 8, 2021
October 1, 2021
1 year
September 26, 2017
March 20, 2020
October 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from zero ("no pain") to ten ("pain as bad as you can imagine") for self-reporting of pain by patients. The following parameters were evaluated using the 11-point NRS: 24-hour Average Pain Score and 24-hour Worst Pain Score Patients evaluated their "average pain" and "worst pain" during the past 24 hours in the evening prior to sleep by touching the appropriate corresponding number between zero and ten on a eDiary device.
Baseline up to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline up to Week 12
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Interference (BPI-SF) Mean Total Score From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline up to Week 12
Change in Weekly Mean of the 24-hour Worst Pain Score, Using an 11-point NRS, From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants Per Patient Global Impression of Change Category at Week 12
Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Pain Reduction at Week 12 on NRS 11 Point Scale
Baseline up to Week 12
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMA401
EXPERIMENTALDuring the treatment epoch, patients will receive EMA401 for 12 weeks. During the treatment withdrawal epoch, patients will receive EMA401 or matching placebo for 1 week.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive matching placebo to EMA401 during both the treatment and treatment withdrawal epochs for a total of 13 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At the time of Screening, must have had documented diagnosis of Type I OR Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with painful distal symmetrical sensorimotor neuropathy (ICD-10 code G63.2) of more than 6 months duration with any one or more of the following:
- Neuropathic symptoms (e.g. numbness, non-painful paresthesias or tingling, non-painful sensory distortions or misinterpretations, etc.)
- Decreased distal sensation (e.g. decreased vibration, pinprick sensation, light touch, etc.)
- Been assessed as suffering from moderate to severe neuropathic pain across the Screening epoch (NRS ≥ 4).
- A score of ≥4 on the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) questionnaire at Screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they were using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 3 days after stopping of study medication. Highly effective contraception methods included:
- Total abstinence (when this was is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal were not acceptable methods of contraception.
- Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman had been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
- Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study, the vasectomized male partner should have been the sole partner for that subject.
- Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
- History or current diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for patients participating in the study.
- Major depressive episode within 6 months prior to Screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria.
- Had evidence of significant renal insufficiency or pre-existing liver condition.
- Had platelets ≤ 100 x 10\^9/L, or neutrophil count \< 1.2 x 10\^9/L (or equivalent), hemoglobin ≤ 100 g/L for women or hemoglobin ≤ 110 g/L for men.
- Participants whose glycemic control had been unstable within 3 months immediately prior to screening (e.g., ketoacidosis requiring hospitalization, any recent episode of hypoglycemia requiring assistance through medical intervention, uncontrolled hyperglycemia)
- Patients who had any differential diagnosis of PDN including but not limited to other neuropathies (e.g. Vitamin B12 deficiency, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy), polyradiculopathies, central disorders (e.g. demyelinating disease), or rheumatological disease (e.g., foot arthritis, plantar fasciitis).
- Patient was unwilling or unable to complete daily eDiary.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (64)
Novartis Investigative Site
Broadmeadow, New South Wales, 2292, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Orange, New South Wales, 2800, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg Heights, Victoria, 3081, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Graz, A-8036, Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Klagenfurt, 9020, Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, A-1090, Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Edegem, 2650, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Pellenberg, 3212, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1336, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Ontario, CAN, L4J 1W3, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Thornhill, Ontario, L4J 8L7, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3E8, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Laval, Quebec, H7T 2P5, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Gentofte Municipality, DK 2820, Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Odense C, DK 5000, Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampere, FIN-33520, Finland
Novartis Investigative Site
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielefeld, D 33647, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Halle, 06120, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Kassel, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, 24119, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04109, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Wiesbaden, 65191, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, HUN, 4032, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Esztergom, HUN, 2500, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, HUN, 6720, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Balatonfüred, 8230, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1085, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1089, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Kistarcsa, 2143, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Pécs, 7632, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, 6725, Hungary
Novartis Investigative Site
Oslo, 0450, Norway
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, POL, 31 505, Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 00 144, Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Caldas da Rainha, 2500 176, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1250 203, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Matosinhos Municipality, 4454 509, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto, 4200 319, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Viana do Castelo, 4901858, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Vila Nova de Gaia, 4434 502, Portugal
Novartis Investigative Site
Lučenec, Slovak Republic, 98401, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 83305, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 85101, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prešov, 080 01, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prešov, 08001, Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41014, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28222, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Bath, BA1 3NG, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Oldham, OL1 2JH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Rice ASC, Dworkin RH, Finnerup NB, Attal N, Anand P, Freeman R, Piaia A, Callegari F, Doerr C, Mondal S, Narayanan N, Ecochard L, Flossbach Y, Pandhi S. Efficacy and safety of EMA401 in peripheral neuropathic pain: results of 2 randomised, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2578-2589. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002252.
PMID: 33675631DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2017
First Posted
September 29, 2017
Study Start
March 14, 2018
Primary Completion
March 25, 2019
Study Completion
March 25, 2019
Last Updated
October 8, 2021
Results First Posted
June 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-10