EPPIC-Net: Platform Protocol to Assess Treatments for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
2 other identifiers
interventional
127
1 country
23
Brief Summary
This is a Platform Protocol to perform Phase II clinical trials in The Early Phase Pain Investigation Clinical Network (EPPIC-Net), under The Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM Initiative, or NIH HEAL InitiativeSM, related to the treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN) in a platform setting to test multiple assets under a single protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for phase_2
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2025
CompletedMarch 19, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.9 years
July 25, 2022
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Daily 0-10 pain NRS
Typically, the primary efficacy endpoint for this Platform Protocol will be based on the daily 0-10 pain NRS. Participants will respond to the following every evening before going to bed: * "Select the number that best describes your average neuropathy pain during the past 24 hours." * "Select the number that best describes your worst neuropathy pain during the past 24 hours." Typically, the primary efficacy endpoint for this Platform Protocol will be based on the daily 0-10 pain NRS. Participants will respond to the following every evening before going to bed: * "Select the number that best describes your average neuropathy pain during the past 24 hours." * "Select the number that best describes your worst neuropathy pain during the past 24 hours."
Past 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Pain, Enjoyment, and General activity scale (PEG)
Past 24 hours
Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Short Form 6 (PCS-SF6)
Past 24 hours
PROMIS Physical Functioning Short-Form 6b
Past 24 hours
Pain Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)
Past 24 hours
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 2 item scale (GAD-2)
Past 24 hours
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN)
Past 24 hours
Neuropathy Examination
Past 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
EN21-01 ISA
EXPERIMENTALThe EN21-01 Intervention Specific Analysis is detailed in the protocol (NCT#)
Placebo Comparator
PLACEBO COMPARATOREach ISA will detail the use of the Placebo Comparator.
Interventions
ISA specific interventions will be listed in their protocols.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to provide informed consent. Legally Authorized Representatives (LARs) are not allowed, but impartial witnesses may be utilized as needed for visually impaired participants.
- years of age and older
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Meets the Toronto Criteria for probable clinical sensorimotor polyneuropathy, with PDPN symptoms present for at least six months. This is defined as a combination of symptoms and signs with any two or more of the following (must be present bilaterally in the distal lower extremities): neuropathic symptoms, decreased distal sensation, or unequivocally decreased (or absent) ankle reflexes. Specifically:
- The presence of any neuropathic symptoms on either the "Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions" (DN4) or the EPPIC-Net Neuropathy Exam will suffice to demonstrate "neuropathic symptoms."
- Decreased distal sensation is satisfied by any of the following:
- i. "Yes" is checked at least once under Question 3 of the DN4 which queries hypoesthesia to touch and pinprick.
- ii. At least one score of "reduced" or "absent" on the right AND at least one score of "reduced" or "absent" on the left in any of the following items from the EPPIC-Net Neuropathy Exam:
- Pin sensation in segments 1 or 2 (i.e. the toes and feet)
- Vibration at the great toe
- Joint position at the great toe
- Light touch/touch pressure at the great toe
- Temperature at the great toe
- Monofilament at the great toe c. Decreased or absent ankle reflexes is satisfied by a score of "reduced" or "absent" on the right AND left in the "Ankle reflex" item in the EPPIC-Net Neuropathy Exam.
- A score of at least 4 on the "Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions" (DN4).
- +8 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Peripheral neuropathy that is known to have been caused by a condition other than diabetes (e.g. HIV, cancer/chemotherapy-induced, other medication-induced, alcohol-induced, hereditary, autoimmune neuropathies, uncontrolled or untreated hypothyroidism). Note that participants will not be tested for HIV, this will be established by patient report or review of the medical record.
- Other significant pain conditions involving the same area as the neuropathy (e.g. physical deformity of the feet, plantar fasciitis, lumbosacral radiculopathy with distal lower extremity pain, fibromyalgia involving the lower limbs, Morton's neuroma), that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the participant's ability to rate the neuropathy pain.
- Other pain conditions not involving the same area as the neuropathy which (in the opinion of the investigator) interfere with the participant's ability to rate the neuropathy pain.
- Any amputation of the lower limb which interferes with the participant's ability to rate the neuropathy pain. If there is any amputation please contact the MM to confirm eligibility prior to randomization to an ISA.
- The presence of any current foot ulcer.
- Significant peripheral vascular disease defined as symptoms consistent with intermittent claudication.
- Use of other investigational drugs within 3 months before screening and throughout the study.
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to all of the assets (active component and excipients) currently being tested in the Platform Protocol.
- Undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy or used an implanted neurostimulating device for neuropathic pain in the distal lower limbs within 3 months of screening.
- Use of the high dose capsaicin patch (8%) in the 6 months before screening and throughout the study (for the treatment of PDPN). Use of the capsaicin patch in a manner that is not expected to interfere with the measurement of PDPN severity is allowed.
- Participants who meet any of the following regarding concomitant treatments:
- Unwilling or unable to discontinue episodic or periodic treatments for pain in the distal legs and/or feet (e.g., injections of local anesthetics).
- Starting a new non-pharmacological pain treatment (e.g. relaxation/hypnosis, physical or occupational therapy, any exercise-based therapy, any talk-based therapy, acupuncture, TENS) for the treatment of PDPN within 4 weeks prior to screening OR planning on starting a new non-pharmacologic treatment for PDPN OR planned changes to a stable non-pharmacologic treatment for PDPN during the study.
- i. Non-pharmacological treatment for conditions other than PDPN is allowed without restriction.
- Active use of opioids or marijuana for any reason at screening and unwilling or unable to discontinue use.
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- James P. Rathmell, MDlead
- New York Universitycollaborator
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaicollaborator
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)collaborator
Study Sites (23)
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92037, United States
South Lake Pain Institute
Clermont, Florida, 34711, United States
SIMEDHealth LLC
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Northwestern Department of Neurology
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Flossmoor)
Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Hazelwood)
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/Neurological Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10451, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14627, United States
Clinical Inquest Center
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45431, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States
Low Country Pain Center
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118, United States
Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510, United States
VCU Department of Neurology
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 32611, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Robinson-Papp, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization assignment within an ISA will be blinded from study participants, staff from clinical sites, investigators, asset owners, IND sponsors, and/or designees. This blinding will be accomplished by providing identical investigational product and packaging for each asset and its corresponding control treatment. The use of IXRS will ensure the blinding is accomplished.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2022
First Posted
July 27, 2022
Study Start
September 21, 2022
Primary Completion
August 28, 2025
Study Completion
August 28, 2025
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The use of Global Unique Identifiers (GUIDs) allows data to be linked with a given research participant, without revealing any of the participant's identifiable information. All participants in NIH-funded research must have a GUID. This study is using the Biomedical Research Informatics Computing System (BRICS) GUID platform to assign GUIDs. This ID should be generated at the time of Informed Consent since it requires several pieces of patient information (e.g., last name at birth, first name at birth, sex at birth, day, month and year of birth, city and country of birth, etc.). The GUID will be a combination of letters and numbers to form a unique identifier, e.g. TBIAC412JJK. Sites should maintain a list to link the GUID to the participant.