Preemptive Analgesia With Celecoxib for Acute Dental Pain Management
Single Dose Oral Celecoxib (With or Without Acetaminophen) for Acute Post-operative Pain Following Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect on postoperative pain of a single agent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) \[celecoxib plus placebo\] to an NSAID combination \[celecoxib plus acetaminophen\] administered preemptively to patients prior to impacted third molar surgery. .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2024
CompletedMarch 27, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.9 years
November 5, 2020
February 27, 2024
February 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
3 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
8 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
12 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
18 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
24 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
36 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
48 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Psychometric response scale to be included in a questionnaire to evaluate pain intensity. A 0-10 pain scale will be used with visual "Faces" to correspond with the numerical values, with 10 indicating worse pain.
72 hours after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire
3 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire
8 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire
12 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire
18 hours after procedure
Pain as Assessed by a Categorical Descriptive Questionnaire
24 hours after procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Celecoxib plus Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSingle oral dose of celecoxib 200 mg with placebo 30 to 60 minutes prior to the dental procedure
Celecoxib plus Acetaminophen
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle oral dose of celecoxib 200 mg in combination with acetaminophen 1000 mg 30 to 60 minutes prior to the dental procedure.
Interventions
Single, preemptive oral dose 200mg of celecoxib. A cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor for pain management. A COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).
Single, preemptive oral dose 1000mg of acetaminophen. An over-the-counter medication for pain management.
A capsule with no active ingredients designed to mimic the appearance of the acetaminophen capsule to ensure blinding of patients and care providers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1 or 2
- at least 1 impacted mandibular third molar planned for extraction
You may not qualify if:
- ASA 3 or higher for physical status classification
- severe pericoronitis associated with third molar to be extracted
- any known allergies to NSAIDs, aspirin, acetaminophen, sulfa drugs
- history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease
- hepatic disease or impairment
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (8)
Bauer HC, Duarte FL, Horliana AC, Tortamano IP, Perez FE, Simone JL, Jorge WA. Assessment of preemptive analgesia with ibuprofen coadministered or not with dexamethasone in third molar surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0360-7. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PMID: 22949122BACKGROUNDCicconetti A, Bartoli A, Ripari F, Ripari A. COX-2 selective inhibitors: a literature review of analgesic efficacy and safety in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Feb;97(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.032.
PMID: 14970772BACKGROUNDGong L, Thorn CF, Bertagnolli MM, Grosser T, Altman RB, Klein TE. Celecoxib pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012 Apr;22(4):310-8. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32834f94cb. No abstract available.
PMID: 22336956BACKGROUNDHawkey CJ. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15(5):801-20. doi: 10.1053/bega.2001.0236.
PMID: 11566042BACKGROUNDJung YS, Kim MK, Um YJ, Park HS, Lee EW, Kang JW. The effects on postoperative oral surgery pain by varying NSAID administration times: comparison on effect of preemptive analgesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Nov;100(5):559-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.065.
PMID: 16243240BACKGROUNDMay N, Epstein J, Osborne B. Selective COX-2 inhibitors: a review of their therapeutic potential and safety in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Oct;92(4):399-405. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115127.
PMID: 11598574BACKGROUNDNissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, Luscher TF, Libby P, Husni ME, Graham DY, Borer JS, Wisniewski LM, Wolski KE, Wang Q, Menon V, Ruschitzka F, Gaffney M, Beckerman B, Berger MF, Bao W, Lincoff AM; PRECISION Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2519-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
PMID: 27959716BACKGROUNDOng CK, Lirk P, Seymour RA, Jenkins BJ. The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-773. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144428.98767.0E.
PMID: 15728066BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small numbers of subjects analyzed due to not returning pain survey.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Harry Gilbert, DDS
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harry D Gilbert, DDS
University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Patient regimen randomization will be achieved by use of a random number generator. The care provider or clinic faculty/nurse will blindly administer the regimen to the patient prior to procedure. A placebo capsule will be used to mimic the acetaminophen capsule to maintain blinding of care provider and patient. Preemptive medications will be dispensed in disposable containers prior to the start of daily operations. The research member tasked with dispensing will not be involved with the administration of medications to patients on the day of surgery. The PI and other members of the research team will not be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS, Professor - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2020
First Posted
March 10, 2021
Study Start
April 22, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2023
Study Completion
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 27, 2024
Results First Posted
March 27, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share