NCT05473949

Brief Summary

This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial. The investigators randomized ASA III and IV patients who underwent cholangiopancreatography. The investigators gave Propofol or Ketofol and compared the outcomes. The primary outcome was security (respiratory depression / hypoventilation).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2017

Completed
5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Security - Hypoventilation / Respiratory Depression

    Hypoventilation / Respiratory Depression defined as: Need for airway management (mandibular subluxation or other permeabilization maneuvers, use of adjuvants, need for assisted or controlled ventilation); Oxygen desaturation measured by pulse oximeter n(\<95%); Apnea (\>10 seconds)

    Intraprocedure

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Security - Intraprocedure hypotension

    During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure

  • Efficiency - Intraprocedure opioid necessity

    During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure

  • Efficiency - Assessment of sedation level

    During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure

  • Quality - Patients satisfaction

    At the end of the procedure (when the patient lucid and oriented in person, time and space) and 24 hours after the end of the procedure

  • Quality - Gastroenterologist satisfaction

    Immediately at the end of the procedure

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

ASA Standard monitorization and nasal spectacle capnography (OC) were used. Supplementary supply of O2 is placed at 2-3 L/min also by OC. The drugs were randomized of the study begins. The investigators didn't know whether ketamine is present in syringes prepared with propofol or not, acting in the same way for both drug combinations. Sedation was performed with: 1\. Propofol: induction with a bolus of 1% propofol (10mL syringe) administered at a dose of 0.75mg/kg; maintenance with 1% propofol infusion (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h. In both arms: * 4 mg of I.V. dexamethasone were administered. * At the beginning of the procedure and atropine and ephedrine were prepared. * At the end of the procedure, paracetamol I.V. 15mg/kg was administered. * If the patient reports VAS\>3 pain in recovery, metamizole magnesium 15mg/kg is also administered. * In case of post-procedure nausea and/or vomiting, 4 mg of ondansetron would be administered as a rescue.

Drug: Profofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients

Ketofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2\. Sedation with ketofol in a 1:4 dilution: induction of sedation with bolus of ketofol (dilution containing 9.5 mL of 1% propofol + 0.5 mL of 5% ketamine) (10mL syringe), administered at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg; maintenance with ketofol infusion (dilution containing 19 mL of 1% Propofol + 1 mL of 5% Ketamine), (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h. The dose used for bolus induction of sedation in both arms of the study is titrated to the needs of each individual patient, although the target approximates the usual recommended dose. If a propofol or ketofol syringe is insufficient considering the patient's weight, another syringe will be prepared with exactly the same dilution as the first. The study was always blind to the investigators.

Drug: Ketofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients

Interventions

Use of 1% Propofol (Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients

Propofol

use of Ketofol (1% Propofol + 5% Ketamine with a ratio 1/4) Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients

Ketofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old
  • ASA III and IV
  • Submitted to retrograde cholangiopancreatography

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refuse
  • ASA I, II and V
  • Ketamine contraindications
  • Allergies to Propofol, Ketamine, dexamethasone, paracetamol, metamizole, ondanseteon or other.
  • General anesthesia necessary I
  • Incapacitaty to sign or absence of patient legal representation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Standard for basis anesthetic monitoring - Committee of Origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 21, 1986, and last amended on October 20, 2010 with an effective date of July 1, 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations - Committee of origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates in October 19,1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013

    BACKGROUND
  • Green SM, Andolfatto G, Krauss B. Ketofol for procedural sedation? Pro and con. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 14. No abstract available.

  • Ronald D. Miller, Miller's Anesthesia, 7th edition, Section III - Anesthetic Pharmacology, Chapter 26: Intravenous Anesthetics, p. 724

    RESULT

Study Officials

  • Amélia Almeida

    Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2022

First Posted

July 26, 2022

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 31, 2017

Study Completion

March 31, 2017

Last Updated

August 9, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Approval from other investigators is required and research center approval - Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte