Ketofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients.
Ketofol (Ketamine and Propofol) Versus Propofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
102
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial. The investigators randomized ASA III and IV patients who underwent cholangiopancreatography. The investigators gave Propofol or Ketofol and compared the outcomes. The primary outcome was security (respiratory depression / hypoventilation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2022
CompletedAugust 9, 2022
August 1, 2022
6 months
March 28, 2022
August 5, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Security - Hypoventilation / Respiratory Depression
Hypoventilation / Respiratory Depression defined as: Need for airway management (mandibular subluxation or other permeabilization maneuvers, use of adjuvants, need for assisted or controlled ventilation); Oxygen desaturation measured by pulse oximeter n(\<95%); Apnea (\>10 seconds)
Intraprocedure
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Security - Intraprocedure hypotension
During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure
Efficiency - Intraprocedure opioid necessity
During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure
Efficiency - Assessment of sedation level
During the procedure and immediately after the end of procedure
Quality - Patients satisfaction
At the end of the procedure (when the patient lucid and oriented in person, time and space) and 24 hours after the end of the procedure
Quality - Gastroenterologist satisfaction
Immediately at the end of the procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORASA Standard monitorization and nasal spectacle capnography (OC) were used. Supplementary supply of O2 is placed at 2-3 L/min also by OC. The drugs were randomized of the study begins. The investigators didn't know whether ketamine is present in syringes prepared with propofol or not, acting in the same way for both drug combinations. Sedation was performed with: 1\. Propofol: induction with a bolus of 1% propofol (10mL syringe) administered at a dose of 0.75mg/kg; maintenance with 1% propofol infusion (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h. In both arms: * 4 mg of I.V. dexamethasone were administered. * At the beginning of the procedure and atropine and ephedrine were prepared. * At the end of the procedure, paracetamol I.V. 15mg/kg was administered. * If the patient reports VAS\>3 pain in recovery, metamizole magnesium 15mg/kg is also administered. * In case of post-procedure nausea and/or vomiting, 4 mg of ondansetron would be administered as a rescue.
Ketofol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2\. Sedation with ketofol in a 1:4 dilution: induction of sedation with bolus of ketofol (dilution containing 9.5 mL of 1% propofol + 0.5 mL of 5% ketamine) (10mL syringe), administered at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg; maintenance with ketofol infusion (dilution containing 19 mL of 1% Propofol + 1 mL of 5% Ketamine), (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h. The dose used for bolus induction of sedation in both arms of the study is titrated to the needs of each individual patient, although the target approximates the usual recommended dose. If a propofol or ketofol syringe is insufficient considering the patient's weight, another syringe will be prepared with exactly the same dilution as the first. The study was always blind to the investigators.
Interventions
Use of 1% Propofol (Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
use of Ketofol (1% Propofol + 5% Ketamine with a ratio 1/4) Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- ASA III and IV
- Submitted to retrograde cholangiopancreatography
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refuse
- ASA I, II and V
- Ketamine contraindications
- Allergies to Propofol, Ketamine, dexamethasone, paracetamol, metamizole, ondanseteon or other.
- General anesthesia necessary I
- Incapacitaty to sign or absence of patient legal representation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Standard for basis anesthetic monitoring - Committee of Origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 21, 1986, and last amended on October 20, 2010 with an effective date of July 1, 2011
BACKGROUNDStatement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations - Committee of origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates in October 19,1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013
BACKGROUNDGreen SM, Andolfatto G, Krauss B. Ketofol for procedural sedation? Pro and con. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 21237532RESULTRonald D. Miller, Miller's Anesthesia, 7th edition, Section III - Anesthetic Pharmacology, Chapter 26: Intravenous Anesthetics, p. 724
RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Amélia Almeida
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2022
First Posted
July 26, 2022
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 31, 2017
Study Completion
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
August 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Approval from other investigators is required and research center approval - Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte