Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit
1 other identifier
interventional
250
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedMarch 9, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 years
November 13, 2017
March 7, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
inform gain analysis
The score of test would represent the inform gain of patient
after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
satification anaylsis
The score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient
after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
Study Arms (2)
traditional vist
NO INTERVENTIONPatients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit
video-assisted
EXPERIMENTALPatients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit
Interventions
Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54.
PMID: 17972617RESULTSnyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.
PMID: 15920209RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Li Kuei Chen, M.D.
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Department of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2017
First Posted
November 17, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share