Superficial MFU-V and Diluted Calcium Hydroxyapatite for the Improvement of Lower Face Skin Quality and Wrinkles
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aging, genetics and environmental factors contribute to multiple changes on the surface of the skin. These present with pigmentation, volume loss, loss of elasticity and loss of collagen. Altogether, areas of the face becomes "crepey", with resulting rhytids and an obvious appearance of thin and fragile skin. These are typically dermal manifestations of elastin and collagen loss resulting in a collective term of loss of "skin quality". Current treatments to improve these changes involve the use of skincare, chemical peels, as well as more invasive repeated treatments such as microneedling and laser resurfacing. These commonly require repeated treatments and several days of downtime. More recently, treatment with a hybrid preparation of high and low-molecular weight complexes that are thermally cross-linked (Profhilo) has been suggested to stimulate collagen and elastin formation, thereby resulting in improvement in skin quality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2023
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
Same day
June 3, 2022
July 19, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Skin Quality
Pre and post treatment comparison of change in skin quality. These will be measured using Quantificare LifeViz Micro, an established tool to objectively measure and validate treatment results of skin quality which will allow to accurately quantify changes with specific measurement tools.
1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post intervention
Change in Wrinkle Reduction
Pre and post treatment comparison of change in dimensions of fine lines (volume/depth/length). These will be measured using Quantificare LifeViz Micro, an established tool to objectively measure and validate treatment results of lines, which will allow to accurately quantify changes with specific measurement tools.
1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Visual Aesthetic Improvement Score
1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post intervention
Other Outcomes (2)
Patient Satisfaction
1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post intervention
Establish Number of Adverse Events
1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post intervention
Study Arms (1)
Ultherapy and Radiesse
EXPERIMENTALDelivered to the lower face areas as drawn using a single transducer with a focal depth of 1.5mm (following a previously published paper (Lowe, 2021) but with extension of the lower treatment area to the two-ruler width (Ulthera marking ruler) as treatment zones. Application will be delivered through a cross-hatching technique. Immediately following MFU-V or up to a week after, diluted CaHA will be administered following the Global Consensus Guidelines published in 2018 by de Almeida et al as follows 1) 1 syringe or 1.5ml of CaHA diluted 1:1 with saline for a total of 3ml of solution or 1.5 diluted CaHA per side will be injected in the subdermal plane with a cannula using a retrograde fanning technique.
Interventions
The Ulthera System is indicated for: - Use for noninvasive dermatological sculpting and lifting of the dermis: Upper Face, Lower Face, Neck, Décolletage. \- Non-invasive treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis
Radiesse injectable implant is an opaque, sterile, non-pyrogenic, semi-solid, cohesive implant. The principal component is synthetic CaHA suspended in a gel carrier that consists primarily of water (sterile water for injection, United States pharmacopeia (USP)), glycerin (USP), and sodium carboxymethylcellulose (USP). Radiesse injectable implant (1.5mL syringe unit) has a CaHA particle size range of 25-45 microns and should be injected sub-dermally with a 27 gauge needle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients with lower face wrinkles
- Otherwise generally healthy.
- Physically and mentally capable to provide informed consent to the study.
- Agreement to attend all follow-up visits as scheduled
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- History of allergic reaction to calcium hydroxylapatite injection;
- Active local infections or skin diseases that might alter wound healing
- Acne or keloidal scarring
- Use of immunosuppressive drugs
- Any other diseases which can affect the wound-healing process
- Any procedures affecting facial wrinkles or skin quality in the lower face for the duration of the study
- Microdermabrasion and Peels
- Acne treatments
- Filler and Botulinum Toxin treatments
- Radiofrequency, Laser, IPL, Ultrasound
- Patients that had cosmetic treatments within 3 months of the baseline visit in the treatment area
- Subjects with dermatologic conditions in the treatment area including:
- Acne
- Rosacea
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cutis Medical Laser Clinics
Singapore, 228210, Singapore
Related Publications (8)
Narins RS, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Gortelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, Jones D, Kerscher M, de Maio M, Mohrmann C, Pooth R, Rzany B, Sattler G, Buchner L, Benter U, Breitscheidel L, Carruthers A. Validated assessment scales for the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2 Spec No.):333-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02247.x.
PMID: 22316189BACKGROUNDShoshani D, Markovitz E, Monstrey SJ, Narins DJ. The modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: a clinical validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun;34 Suppl 1:S85-91; discussion S91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34248.x.
PMID: 18547187BACKGROUNDInformation and Instruction Manual for Cutometer® dual MPA 580. English 2019/02 DK. [Available from: https://www.courage-khazaka.de/en/16-wissenschaftliche-produkte/alle-produkte/178-cutometer-e
BACKGROUNDLowe S. Single Treatment, Single Depth Superficial Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization for Rhytid Improvement. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jul 13;9(7):e3662. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003662. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PMID: 34277316RESULTRamirez S, Puah IBK. Effectiveness of combined microfocused ultrasound with visualization and subdermal calcium hydroxyapatite injections for the management of brachial skin laxity. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;20(12):3871-3879. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14573. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
PMID: 34716645RESULTGoldie K, Peeters W, Alghoul M, Butterwick K, Casabona G, Chao YYY, Costa J, Eviatar J, Fabi SG, Lupo M, Sattler G, Waldorf H, Yutskovskaya Y, Lorenc P. Global Consensus Guidelines for the Injection of Diluted and Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Skin Tightening. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 1:S32-S41. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001685.
PMID: 30358631RESULTde Almeida AT, Figueredo V, da Cunha ALG, Casabona G, Costa de Faria JR, Alves EV, Sato M, Branco A, Guarnieri C, Palermo E. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxyapatite (Radiesse) as a Face and Body Biostimulatory Agent. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar 14;7(3):e2160. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002160. eCollection 2019 Mar.
PMID: 31044123RESULTCasabona G, Michalany N. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization and fillers for increased neocollagenesis: clinical and histological evaluation. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Dec;40 Suppl 12:S194-8. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000231. No abstract available.
PMID: 25417575RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- • Blinded assessment of aesthetic improvement at each visit as follows: Blinded reviewer to make qualitative comparisons of images of treated arms vs. baseline at each follow-up visit. If the reviewer perceived an improvement, he/she ask will be asked to select the correct post-treatment photograph
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2022
First Posted
July 21, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
April 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data will be shared.