NCT05456334

Brief Summary

This blinded controlled 2-year study on 120 patients with 2 or more actinic keratoses, compare the efficacy and tolerability of pulsed dye-laser- mediated photodynamic therapy compared to conventional photodynamic therapy and fractional-laser assisted daylight photodynamic therapy compared to daylight photodynamic therapy.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2016

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7.8 years

First QC Date

July 4, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient complete (%, P) or partial clearance (%, P)

    All actinic keratoses on the particular treatment area cleared, or 75% of lesions on treatment area cleared

    2 year

  • Lesion-specific clearance (%, P)

    Proportion of lesions that completely healed, partially healed or not healed in the particular treatment

    2 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient reported pain

    1 day

Study Arms (4)

Pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

After curretage light-sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the lesions and covered with an occlusive plastic foil for 2-3-h incubation. Then a local lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied. The lesions were illuminated with 30% overlapping pulsed laser double-stacked pulses (, energy 7 J/cm2, spot size 7 mm, pulse duration 10 ms, wavelength 595 nm and dynamic cooling 2/3).

Device: Pulsed-dye laserDrug: Metvix cream

Conventional photodynamic therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After curretage a light-sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the lesions and covered with an occlusive plastic foil for 2-3-h incubation. Then a local lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied. The lesions were illuminated with a red LED light for 7-8 min (exposure 75 J/cm2, wavelength 630 nm).

Drug: Metvix cream

Ablative fractional laser- mediated daylight photodynamic therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

After curretage lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied on the whole treatment area. Lesions were treated with an ablative fractional CO2-laser (19 W, Dot mode, spacing 1000 µm, stack 3, scanning dwell time 1800 µs, repeat 0.5 s). A thin layer of light sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the treatment area. The patients were asked to move outdoors (temperature \>10C, no rain, June-August) or to our adPDT-room (IndoorLux®, wavelength 350-750 nm, 15-25 000 lux) within 30 minutes, for the 2h-illumination.

Device: Fractional CO2-laserDrug: Metvix cream

Daylight photodynamic therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After curretage lidocaine anaesthetic spray was applied on the whole treatment area. A thin layer of light sensitizer (methyl aminolaevulinate cream) was applied on the treatment area. The patients were asked to move outdoors (temperature \>10C, no rain, June-August) or to our adPDT-room (IndoorLux®, wavelength 350-750 nm, 15-25 000 lux) within 30 minutes, for the 2h-illumination.

Drug: Metvix cream

Interventions

Comparance of pulsed-dye laser-mediated and conventional photodynamic therapy in a split-head design

Pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy

Comparance of fractional CO2-laser-mediated or plain daylight photodynamic therapy in a split-head design

Ablative fractional laser- mediated daylight photodynamic therapy

Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms

Ablative fractional laser- mediated daylight photodynamic therapyConventional photodynamic therapyDaylight photodynamic therapyPulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • at least 2 AKs located on both sides of the head (either the scalp, forehead, temples, or cheeks)

You may not qualify if:

  • pigmented AKs, in situ-carcinomas, skin cancers, psoriasis or eczema on the treatment area

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Keratosis, Actinic

Interventions

Lasers, Dye

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsKeratosisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LasersOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and Supplies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: half-side comparative randomized controlled study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2022

First Posted

July 13, 2022

Study Start

March 24, 2016

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

November 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share