Daylight-PDT With MAL for AK and Photodamaged Skin
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Two-armed, Study Comparing Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Using MAL With Cryosurgery for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Skin of the Face
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study is a multicenter study investigating the clinical efficacy of repetitive daylight-PDT with MAL (Methylaminolevulinate) compared to cryosurgery in regard to prophylaxis and treatment of AKs (actinic keratoses) in the face. Patients will be randomly allocated to treatment groups. 5 PDT (photodynamic therapy) treatment sessions (visits 1-5) will be performed within 18 months. In the control group, cryosurgery will be performed at visit 1, and in case of non-cleared or newly occurred AKs at visits 2-5. In the PDT group the patients will apply a chemical sunscreen (SPF 50+) to the whole face and other light-exposed, unprotected areas of the skin. After at least 15 minutes a lesion preparation of AKs (removal of crusts) will be performed and MAL will be applied in a thin layer to the whole face. Within 30 min after MAL application patients expose themselves to daylight for 2 hours. In the control group, cryosurgery will be performed using liquid nitrogen spray in each AK lesion; this will be done at visit 1 and, if necessary, also at visits 2-5. At visits 2-6, the efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated by the observer by documenting all existing and newly appearing AKs in the face.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2018
CompletedNovember 9, 2020
November 1, 2020
2.5 years
March 11, 2016
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The cumulative number of observed AKs at time points 2 to 6 (3 months after the first treatment to 24 months after the first treatment).
Newly occured AK lesions are counted at visit 2, visit 3, visit 4, visit 5 and visit 6. The number of newly occured AK lesions during the study are added up, therefore we included the term "cumulative".
24 months after the first treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Complete clearance of AKs on lesion basis
This outcome measure is assessed three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment.
Complete clearance of AKs on patient basis
This outcome measure is assessed three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment.
Photodamage parameters (fine lines, mottled pigmentation, tactile roughness, teleangiectasias, sallowness and global score for photoaging) will be evaluated on a 5-point scale according to Dover et al.
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment.
Visual pain score
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment
Adverse events
This outcome measure is assessed at day 0 (= the first treatment), three months after the first and the second treatment and 6 months after the third, fourth and fifth treatment
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT)
EXPERIMENTALOne intervention in the daylight photodynamic therapy arm: Daylight photodynamic therapy using Methylaminolevulinate (MAL) will be performed five times within 18 months (visits 1-5). In the PDT group the patients will apply a chemical sunscreen (SPF 50+) to the whole face and other light-exposed, unprotected areas of the skin. After at least 15 minutes a lesion preparation of AKs (removal of crusts) will be performed and methylaminolevulinate (MAL) will be applied in a thin layer to the whole face. Within 30 min after MAL application patients expose themselves to daylight for 2 hours.
Cryosurgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the control group, cryosurgery will be performed at visit 1, and in case of non-cleared or newly occurred AKs at visits 2-5. In the control group, cryosurgery will be performed using liquid nitrogen spray in each AK lesion; this will be done at visit 1 and, if necessary, also at visits 2-5. At visits 2-6, the efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated by the observer by documenting all existing and newly appearing AKs in the face.
Interventions
In the Daylight photodynamic therapy arm the patients will apply a sunscreen to the whole face which is followed by lesion preparation of AKs. Following this, MAL will be applied in a thin layer to the whole face. Within 30 min after MAL application patients expose themselves to daylight for 2 hours. 5 photodynamic therapy treatment sessions (visits 1-5) will be performed within 18 months.
In the control group, cryosurgery as standard reference therapy will be performed at visit 1, and in case of non-cleared or newly occurred AKs at visits 2-5. Cryosurgery of AK lesions will be investigated as standard reference therapy. Single freeze-thaw cryosurgery is performed using an open spraying procedure with liquid nitrogen with nozzle size C. After formation of an ice-ball of the required size, freeze time starts. Freeze time should lie between 5 s and 10 s.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent has been signed prior to or at Screening Visit
- Male and female patients with Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV
- Age \> 40 years
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
- Women in child-bearing age using highly efficient contraceptive methods (\<1% failure rate per year)
- Clinical diagnosis of actinic keratosis (AK)
- A minimum of five non-hyperkeratotic, non-pigmented AK lesions in the face.
- Glogau Photodamage Classification Type II (moderate) - IV (severe)
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of porphyria
- Hyperkeratotic or pigmented AK in the face
- Malignant skin tumors in the face or on the capillitium, requiring treatment
- Patients with clinically relevant suppression of the immune system (e.g. drug induced, infection) or organ transplant patients
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Planned aesthetic treatments in the face in the next 24 months (filler, peeling, botulinumtoxin, skin resurfacing)
- Known intolerance or allergy to MAL or to any other ingredient of Metvix® 160mg/g cream
- Known intolerance to Actinica® lotion
- Photosensitivity
- Suspected lack of compliance (e.g. due to dementia)
- Concomitant UV-phototherapy
- Skin diseases that might interfere with response evaluation of study treatment
- Skin sun sensitivity type V or VI according to Fitzpatrick
- PDT in the face during 6 months preceding study treatment
- Non-permitted medication:
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
University hospital Regensburg
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053, Germany
Hautzentrum Köln
Cologne, 50966, Germany
University Hospital Düsseldorf.
Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
Klinikum Vest GmbH Knappschaftskrankenhaus
Recklinghausen, 45657, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Kohl E, Koller M, Zeman F, Szeimies RM, Philipp-Dormston WG, Prager W, Gerber PA, Karrer S. Daylight photodynamic therapy versus cryosurgery for the treatment and prophylaxis of actinic keratoses of the face - protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, two-armed study. BMC Dermatol. 2017 Oct 25;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12895-017-0064-7.
PMID: 29070025DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2016
First Posted
April 13, 2016
Study Start
March 3, 2016
Primary Completion
September 9, 2018
Study Completion
September 9, 2018
Last Updated
November 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11