NCT02520700

Brief Summary

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses visible light to treat a premalignant condition, called actinic keratosis, which results on chronically sun exposed skin such as on a balding scalp. A cream is applied containing aminolaevulinic acid or methyl aminolaevulinate and this is converted in the cells to the photodegradable product protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). Visible light causes the degradation of PpIX resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species and then cell death in the actinic keratosis. In conventional PDT a lamp is used to supply the visible light. The main draw back to treatment is pain. Recent studies have shown that daylight can be used as the source of visible light and is as effective as conventional PDT. Patients find this form of treatment less painful and therefore preferable. The reduction in pain seen in daylight PDT appears to be related to the fact that no significant quantity of PpIX accumulates prior to exposure to the light source and small quantities of PpIX are activated continuously during daylight exposure. The drawback of performing daylight PDT in Ireland is the climate, both in terms of cloud cover and temperature. The typical daylight treatment times is 2 hours and it would be difficult for patients to stay outside in winter, spring and autumn. This study investigates the use of an artificial white light source, a Maquet PWD 50SF theatre-light, as an alternative.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

July 30, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The reduction in the actinic keratosis count per treatment field

    Palpable AKs within those areas defined as treatment fields will be counted, mapped and photographed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months

    9 months follow up

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain scores on visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes during treatment

    2 hours of treatment duration

  • Patient satisfaction with treatment, on a scale of zero to ten

    At follow up one to three days post treatment

  • Erythema or erosions (mild/moderate/severe)

    1 - 3 days post treatment

Study Arms (1)

Study participants

EXPERIMENTAL

This was split scalp design - so each patient had one half of scalp treated with daylight PDT and one side treated with the artificial white light PDT - a surgical light (Maquet Power 500 LED surgery light)

Device: Daylight and Maquet Power 500 LED surgery light

Interventions

Comparing the use of daylight and a surgical light (Maquet Power 500 LED surgery light) to activate ALA cream for treatment of actinic keratoses

Study participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patient requiring treatment for actinic keratoses on forehead or scalp

You may not qualify if:

  • immunosuppressed patients, those with abnormal photosensitivity, contact allergy to topical therapy for use in the study or pregnancy and breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • O'Gorman SM, Clowry J, Manley M, McCavana J, Gray L, Kavanagh A, Lally A, Collins P. Artificial White Light vs Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;152(6):638-44. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.5436.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Keratosis, Actinic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsKeratosisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Dermatologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2015

First Posted

August 13, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 13, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08