A Comparison of White-light and Daylight Topical Methyl 5-aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses
1 other identifier
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses visible light to treat a premalignant condition, called actinic keratosis, which results on chronically sun exposed skin such as on a balding scalp. A cream is applied containing aminolaevulinic acid or methyl aminolaevulinate and this is converted in the cells to the photodegradable product protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). Visible light causes the degradation of PpIX resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species and then cell death in the actinic keratosis. In conventional PDT a lamp is used to supply the visible light. The main draw back to treatment is pain. Recent studies have shown that daylight can be used as the source of visible light and is as effective as conventional PDT. Patients find this form of treatment less painful and therefore preferable. The reduction in pain seen in daylight PDT appears to be related to the fact that no significant quantity of PpIX accumulates prior to exposure to the light source and small quantities of PpIX are activated continuously during daylight exposure. The drawback of performing daylight PDT in Ireland is the climate, both in terms of cloud cover and temperature. The typical daylight treatment times is 2 hours and it would be difficult for patients to stay outside in winter, spring and autumn. This study investigates the use of an artificial white light source, a Maquet PWD 50SF theatre-light, as an alternative.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2015
CompletedAugust 13, 2015
August 1, 2015
1.7 years
July 30, 2015
August 9, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The reduction in the actinic keratosis count per treatment field
Palpable AKs within those areas defined as treatment fields will be counted, mapped and photographed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months
9 months follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain scores on visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes during treatment
2 hours of treatment duration
Patient satisfaction with treatment, on a scale of zero to ten
At follow up one to three days post treatment
Erythema or erosions (mild/moderate/severe)
1 - 3 days post treatment
Study Arms (1)
Study participants
EXPERIMENTALThis was split scalp design - so each patient had one half of scalp treated with daylight PDT and one side treated with the artificial white light PDT - a surgical light (Maquet Power 500 LED surgery light)
Interventions
Comparing the use of daylight and a surgical light (Maquet Power 500 LED surgery light) to activate ALA cream for treatment of actinic keratoses
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient requiring treatment for actinic keratoses on forehead or scalp
You may not qualify if:
- immunosuppressed patients, those with abnormal photosensitivity, contact allergy to topical therapy for use in the study or pregnancy and breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
O'Gorman SM, Clowry J, Manley M, McCavana J, Gray L, Kavanagh A, Lally A, Collins P. Artificial White Light vs Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;152(6):638-44. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.5436.
PMID: 26843523DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Dermatologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2015
First Posted
August 13, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08