NCT05435040

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare, with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace, the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients suffering from proprioceptive deficit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 14, 2022

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 19, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 24, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 24, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligaments ruptureproprioceptive knee bracerehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients with proprioceptive deficit with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace.

    The functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee is measured via the 3-axis composite score of the Y Balance Test (YBT). This score corresponds to the average of the 3 maximum distances obtained during the YBT test, normalized by leg length.

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Evaluation of tactile sensitivity (baresthesia) with or without wearing the knee brace

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

  • Evaluation of the sensitivity to the position of a joint with or without wearing the knee brace

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

  • Evaluation of the static stability when using or not the knee brace.

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

  • Evaluation of the stability when walking when using or not the knee brace.

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

  • Evaluation of the discomfort level when using or not the knee brace.

    Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

self-comparison

EXPERIMENTAL

The patient will be fitted with proprioceptive knee brace and with no knee brace. the patient will perform tests (Y Balance Test, test with Weinstein monofilaments, and Joint Position Sense test) and complete visual analog scales with and without the proprioceptive knee brace in a randomized order. There is also a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the proprioceptive knee brace to be completed at the end of the study.

Device: proprioceptive knee braceDevice: No knee brace

Interventions

the patient will perform the tests with the knee brace

self-comparison

the patient will perform the tests without the knee brace

self-comparison

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with a proprioception deficit of the knee: detection threshold higher than 2.5° on the TTDPM (Threshold to detect passive motion) test
  • Patient whose knee measurements are compatible with the sizes of the proprioceptive knee brace
  • Patient having signed a free and informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security plan

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with knee pain on walking greater than or equal to 4 out of 10 on a VAS scale.
  • Patient in the early phase of acute trauma to the lower limb
  • Pregnant women
  • Patient presenting one of the contraindications to the use of the knee brace, indicated in the instructions for use
  • Patient with a major cognitive impairment incompatible with participation in a clinical trial
  • Patient participating in another clinical investigation conducted to establish the conformity of a DM (Medical Device) impacting the judgment criteria
  • Vulnerable patient according to article L1121-6 of the public health code, person subject to a judicial protection measure or unable to consent freely

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinique de la sauvegarde

Lyon, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The Sensorimotor System, Part II: The Role of Proprioception in Motor Control and Functional Joint Stability. J Athl Train. 2002 Jan;37(1):80-4.

    PMID: 16558671BACKGROUND
  • Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P. Receptors in the knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1991;18(5):341-68.

    PMID: 2036801BACKGROUND
  • Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Chmielewski TL, Borsa PA. Measurement and evaluation of dynamic joint stability of the knee and ankle after injury. Sports Med. 2006;36(5):393-410. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636050-00003.

    PMID: 16646628BACKGROUND
  • Fremerey RW, Lobenhoffer P, Zeichen J, Skutek M, Bosch U, Tscherne H. Proprioception after rehabilitation and reconstruction in knees with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Aug;82(6):801-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b6.10306.

    PMID: 10990300BACKGROUND
  • Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: A critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2014.10.004. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

    PMID: 30356896BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Somatosensory Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Roger OULLION, MD

    Clinique de la Sauvegarde

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
the clinical trial is carried out in open label
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a prospective, single-center, interventional, open-label, 1-day clinical investigation in a population of patients with proprioceptive knee deficiency. A randomization will be performed in order to know the order of passage of the 2 conditions: with and without wearing a knee brace.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2022

First Posted

June 28, 2022

Study Start

October 19, 2022

Primary Completion

November 24, 2022

Study Completion

November 24, 2022

Last Updated

April 26, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations