NCT05716165

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of wearing bilateral proprioceptive knee braces on the endurance of subjects aged 60 to 80 years.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 12, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 12, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

January 25, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

knee bracesocceragedExercise

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the effect of bilateral proprioceptive knee braces on the endurance of subjects compared to without knee brace.

    The evaluation of the subjects' endurance corresponds to the difference in results obtained during the 6-minutes walk test in the absence and presence of knee braces.

    week 1

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Evaluate the impact of knee braces on balance compared to without knee brace.

    week 1

  • Evaluate the impact of knee braces on lower limb strength compared to without knee brace.

    week 1

  • Evaluate the impact of knee braces on walking speed compared to without knee brace.

    week 1

  • Evaluate the impact of knee braces on the volunteer's feelings about the stability of his knees, their range of motion, his confidence when walking and his fear of falling after the tests and after the training

    week 1, week 2

  • Evaluate the influence of the functional capacity of the knees of each volunteer at inclusion on the various performance parameters measured

    Day 0

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

self-comparison

EXPERIMENTAL

Volunteers will be asked to wear a knee brace on each limb during one of the training sessions. At the end of this training session, a questionnaire will be given to the volunteer to evaluate knee stability, range of motion, confidence when walking, and fear of falling. The volunteers will then have to participate in 2 test sessions: one with and one without knee braces. The patient will perform tests (Unipodal balance on flat ground, 30s chair stand test, 2,5m up and go test, 6 min-walk) with and without the proprioceptive knee brace in a randomized order. At the end of the tests with and without knee brace, a questionnaire will be given to the volunteer to evaluate the stability of the knee, the range of motion, the confidence when walking, the fear of falling, as well as a satisfaction questionnaire about the device. There is also a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the proprioceptive knee brace to be completed at the end of the study.

Device: proprioceptive knee bracesDevice: No knee brace

Interventions

The patient will perform the tests with the knee braces.

self-comparison

The patient will perform the tests without the knee brace.

self-comparison

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject practicing recreational soccer
  • Subject included in the LIBM (inter-university laboratory of motor biology) study: "Effect of recreational soccer practice in persons aged 60 to 80 years"
  • Patient whose knee measurements are compatible with the knee brace sizes
  • Patient who has signed a free and informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security plan

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with any of the contraindications to the use of the knee brace, as indicated in the instructions for use
  • Patient with a major cognitive impairment incompatible with participation in a clinical trial
  • Patient participating in another clinical investigation conducted to establish the conformity of a device impacting the judgment criteria
  • Vulnerable patient according to article L1121-6 of the public health code, person subject to a legal protection measure or unable to consent freely

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Saint-Etienne Jean Monnet University

Saint-Etienne, 42270, France

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Baltaci G, Aktas G, Camci E, Oksuz S, Yildiz S, Kalaycioglu T. The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance: balance, proprioception, coordination, and muscular power. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Oct;19(10):1722-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1491-3. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

    PMID: 21468615BACKGROUND
  • Bean JF, Vora A, Frontera WR. Benefits of exercise for community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;85(7 Suppl 3):S31-42; quiz S43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.010.

    PMID: 15221722BACKGROUND
  • Buchner DM, Cress ME, de Lateur BJ, Esselman PC, Margherita AJ, Price R, Wagner EH. The effect of strength and endurance training on gait, balance, fall risk, and health services use in community-living older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997 Jul;52(4):M218-24. doi: 10.1093/gerona/52a.4.m218.

    PMID: 9224433BACKGROUND
  • Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Balance and gait in the elderly: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb 4;4(1):143-153. doi: 10.1002/lio2.252. eCollection 2019 Feb.

    PMID: 30828632BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Roger OULLION, MD

    Saint-Etienne Jean Monnet University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
the clinical trial is carried out in open label
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a prospective, monocentric, randomized clinical investigation (order of tests with and without knee braces), carried out in open, over a period of 2 weeks (cohort 1) or 12 weeks (cohort 2), in a population of people aged 60 to 80 years practicing recreational soccer.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2023

First Posted

February 8, 2023

Study Start

February 14, 2023

Primary Completion

April 12, 2024

Study Completion

April 12, 2024

Last Updated

February 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations