Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age
Z 32104 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age
1 other identifier
observational
400
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This is a prospective cohort study of women enrolled early in pregnancy, with randomization to determine the timing of three follow-up visits in the second and third trimester. At each of these follow-up visits, investigators will assess gestational age with the FAMLI technology and compare that estimate to the known gestational age established early in pregnancy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 13, 2023
CompletedMay 8, 2024
December 1, 2023
10 months
June 21, 2022
May 6, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of FAMLI Technology
Difference in mean absolute error (MAE) of the index test and clinical reference standard in the primary evaluation window
From 14 through 27 completed weeks of gestation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean absolute error in the secondary evaluation window
From 28 through 36 completed weeks of gestation
Study Arms (1)
Pregnant Women
Pregnant women with gestational age established at less than 14 weeks of gestation
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women at 14 weeks or earlier gestation
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- viable intrauterine pregnancy at less than 14 0/7 weeks of gestation
- ability and willingness to provide written informed consent
- intent to remain in current geographical area of residence for the duration of study
- willingness to adhere to study procedures
You may not qualify if:
- maternal body mass index = 40 kg/m\^2
- multiple gestation (i.e., twins or higher order)
- major fetal malformation or anomaly
- any other condition (social or medical) that, in the opinion of the study staff, would make study participation unsafe or complicate data interpretation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
University Teaching Hospital
Lusaka, Zambia
Related Publications (1)
Stringer JSA, Pokaprakarn T, Prieto JC, Vwalika B, Chari SV, Sindano N, Freeman BL, Sikapande B, Davis NM, Sebastiao YV, Mandona NM, Stringer EM, Benabdelkader C, Mungole M, Kapilya FM, Almnini N, Diaz AN, Fecteau BA, Kosorok MR, Cole SR, Kasaro MP. Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated AI Tool to Estimate Gestational Age From Blind Ultrasound Sweeps. JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):649-657. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10770.
PMID: 39088200DERIVED
Biospecimen
Whole blood, plasma, serum, and urine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeff Stringer, MD
University of North Carolina
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2022
First Posted
June 27, 2022
Study Start
July 27, 2022
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
November 13, 2023
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- 9-36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- noted above
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.