NCT05432258

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the 2-year clinical performance of bulk-fill composites, which can be applied as a single layer, and the nano-hybrid filled composite resins, which are frequently used in clinical routine, in children in a split-mouth design. This study was conducted on 89 patients aged 6-12 years who had caries on bilateral mandibular first molars. Our study has a randomized, cross-controlled, and double-blind design. In split-mouth design, restorations of mandibular permanent molars completed with nano-hybrid ORMOCER based bulk-fill filling material Admira Fusion x-tra (Voco GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) and nano-hybrid composite Grandio (Voco , Cuxhaven, Germany). Futurabond U single dose (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) universal adhesive was used for all restorations, in the selective enamel etching mode. The clinical success of the restorations will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24-month controls. Evaluations has been made by two physicians other than the one who did the restoration, who do not know which restorative material was applied to which tooth.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
89

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2022

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 26, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 26, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 2, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comparison of clinical performances between two restorative materials according to World Dental Federation (FDI)(1-5 scale; 1 best, 5 worst)

    Change of World Dental Federation (FDI) scores of restoration from baseline to 2 year

    immediately after restoration and 24 months control

  • Comparison of clinical performances between two restorative materials according to US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria (Alfa-best, Bravo, Charlie-worst)

    Change of the US Public Health Service (USPHS) scores of restoration from baseline to 2 year

    immediately after restoration and 24 months control

Study Arms (2)

Bulk-fill composite resin

EXPERIMENTAL

Bulk-fill Ormocer composite resin restorations on the mandibular first molars applied in layers of 4 mm depth

Device: Bulk-fill composite resin

Nano-fill composite resin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Nano-fill composite resin restorations on the mandibular first molars were applied in layers of 2 mm depth

Device: Nano-fill composite resin

Interventions

Restoration of the mandibular first molars with bulk-fill composite resin as the manufacturer advises after the cavity preparation

Also known as: Admira Fusion x-tra (Voco GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany)
Bulk-fill composite resin

Restoration of the mandibular first molars with nano-fill composite resin as the manufacturer advises after the cavity preparation

Also known as: Grandio (Voco , Cuxhaven, Germany)
Nano-fill composite resin

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Black class I or II caries on two bilateral mandibular permanent molars; clinically at score 3, 4 and 5 according to the ICDAS II (International Caries Detection and Evaluation System); and radiographically; with D2-RB4 and D3-RC5 levels
  • plaque index (Silnes and Löe, 1964) scores of the teeth to be processed was 0 and 1
  • the gingival index (Löe and Silness, 1963) score was 0

You may not qualify if:

  • On the teeth to be processed; color change in the pits and fissures of the tooth, with no signs of caries after air drying for 5 seconds (ICDAS II Scale score 0), discoloration or opacity that is not visible when moist but observed after drying (ICDAS II Scale score 1), observable when both moist and dry or with opacity (ICDAS II Scale score 2), containing more than half of the tooth, with a large cavity in which dentin is observed (ICDAS II Score 6), Black class I and/or class II enamel-dentin caries,
  • The values accepted in the evaluation of radiographic dental caries in the teeth for which the procedure is planned are E0-R0 (no radiolucency), E1-RA1 (radiolucency in the upper ½ of the enamel), E2-RA2 (radiolucency extending to the radiolucency-enamel-dentin junction in the lower ½ of the enamel) , with D1-RA3 (radiolucency observed in the upper 1/3 of the dentin),
  • Non-antagonist of the teeth to be processed,
  • In the gingival region of the teeth to be treated, there are areas covered with plaque from thin to medium thickness (plaque index score 2) and areas where the plaque thickness fills the gingival sulcus and where the soft attachment is high (plaque index score 3) (Löe and Silness, 1964),
  • Bleeding and inflammation in the gingiva of the tooth to be treated (gingival index score (Löe and Silness, 1963) 1,2 and 3),
  • Devitalized teeth for which the procedure is planned,
  • The patient's lack of cooperation and physician cooperation to have the procedures performed (Score 1 and 2 on the Frankl behavioral scale).
  • Having any systemic disease that prevents the treatment (ASA 2,3,4,5,6)
  • Patients who will not comply with their appointments will not be included in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double blind
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In a split-mouth design, 89 patients' 2 mandibular first molars were divided into 2 groups. Per patient, one mandibular first molar had bulk-fill ormocer-based composite resin restoration and 1 mandibular first molar had nanofill composite resin restoration via incremental technic.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2022

First Posted

June 27, 2022

Study Start

June 15, 2020

Primary Completion

July 26, 2022

Study Completion

July 26, 2022

Last Updated

October 2, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Locations