Can Zirconia Crown be the First Choice for Primary Teeth?
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: Early loss of primary teeth due to caries, can cause occlusion disorders, aesthetic problems, nutritional problems, abnormal language habits, speech disorders and psychological problems temporary or permanent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of using prefabricated aesthetic crowns for the restoration of excessive tooth loss. Study design: In this randomized, non-blinded clinical study a total of 45 teeth were included, primary molars and anterior teeth and requiring restoration after root canal treatment. Stainless steel(SCC), zirconia(ZC) and strip(S) crowns compared clinically, radiographically and periodontally during follow up period for 6 months. Parents were asked to fill out questionnaire at the 1st and 6th months to evaluate the satisfaction level. In addition, patients' pain and discomfort level was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2020
CompletedFebruary 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
1.2 years
September 15, 2020
February 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual examination
The incidence of crown retention, gingival index, marginal crown localisation
6 months follow up period
Radiographic evaluation
Periapical film: the rate of radiolucency. According to the index, each tooth was categorized as having a normal periapical structure (score 1), small changes in bone structure (score 2), changes in bone structure with some mineral loss (score 3), periodontitis with well-defined radiolucent areas (score 4), or severe apical periodontitis with exacerbating features (score 5)
6 months follow up period
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Questionaire
6 months follow up period
Study Arms (4)
Group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORZirconia crown anterior (NuSmile, Houston, Texas, USA).
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORZirconia crown posterior (NuSmile, Houston, Texas, USA).
Group 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORStainless steel crown (3M-ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA)
Group 4
ACTIVE COMPARATORStrip Crown (3M-ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA)
Interventions
Pediatric size dental crown; restore damaged tooth to its normal shape, size, and function.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients without systemic disease The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)1-2,
- Patients under 10 years old to perform endodontic treatment for adequate root support
- Clinical and radiographically confirmed dental caries scored international caries detection and assessment system(icdas) criteria 4-5.
- Patient/parent approve
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with systemic and mental diseases
- Acute abscess or mobility
- Internal or external resorption
- Inadequate oral hygiene after oral health motivation that contraindicate root canal treatment
- Need for endocarditis prophylaxis
- Temporomandibular joint(TMJ) disorders, bruxism
- Absence of antagonistic teeth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erciyes University
Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Walia T, Brigi C, KhirAllah ARMM. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of posterior primary zirconia crowns. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Feb;20(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0382-4. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
PMID: 30343392BACKGROUNDSeminario AL, Garcia M, Spiekerman C, Rajanbabu P, Donly KJ, Harbert P. Survival of Zirconia Crowns in Primary Maxillary Incisors at 12-, 24- and 36-Month Follow-Up. Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep 15;41(5):385-390.
PMID: 31648670BACKGROUNDEl Makawi Y, Khattab N. In Vitro Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Endocrown and Prefabricated Zirconium Crown in Pulpotomized Primary Molars. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 13;7(23):4094-4100. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.864. eCollection 2019 Dec 15.
PMID: 32165959BACKGROUNDSonbol HN, Al-Bitar ZB, Shraideh AZ, Al-Omiri MK. Parental-caregiver perception of child oral-health related quality of life following zirconia crown placement and non-restoration of carious primary anterior teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;19(1):21-28. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.04.
PMID: 29569449BACKGROUNDLee JH. Guided tooth preparation for a pediatric zirconia crown. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Mar;149(3):202-208.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.08.048. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29395008BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assocciate Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2020
First Posted
October 5, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 9, 2018
Study Completion
September 9, 2019
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results