A Comparative Clinical Study of Different Caries Removal Techniques in Pediatric Patients
Farklı çürük Temizleme yöntemlerinin çocuk Hastalarda Klinik Olarak karşılaştırılması
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptance of pediatric patiens using Er: YAG laser in comparison with the conventional techniques for caries removal. The study was carried out on 100 children between the ages of 9-12, who had class 1 occlusal caries in one of their permanent first molars. The patients were divided into two groups; conventional technical group and laser group. Rotary handpieces was used in conventional technique group, Er:YAG laser was used in the laser group for caries removal. The heart rate of each patient was measured during the caries removal procedure at 30 seconds intervals. The pain during the procedure was determined by VAS. CFSS-DS scale was used to determine the anxiety level of the patients before and after the procedure. FIS was used to determine how patients are disturbed from the smell, taste, sound, vibration and sight of the devices after the procedure. The video segments were collected from the patients during the caries removal and the procedural pain were evaluated by the FLACC scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2020
October 1, 2020
4 months
September 24, 2020
October 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Comfort
Units on a Scale ( Patient comfort was evaluated with Facial Image Scale after treatment. Patients signed from 1 to 5 score for treatment comfort.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, "1" and "2" scores are considered as better outcome. Patients who signed these scores described as good comfortable. The worst outcome is considered as the patients signed "4-5". Each scale range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Dental anxiety
Units on a Scale (Dental anxiety was evaluated with Dental Subscale of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule after treatment. The patients signed from 0 to 38 score for dental anxiety after the treatment.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, " 0-38" scores are considered as better outcome. Patients who were have these scores described no dental anxiety for treatment. The worst outcome is considered as the patients have "\>38". Each scale range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Changes in pain
Units on a Scale (Changes in pain was evaluated with Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale after treatment. Observer signed from 0 to 3 score for treatment pain during the treatment.The data were collected and statistically analysed using by the numerical data. In this study, "0" and "1" scores are considered as better outcome. Patients who were signed these scores described as no pain for treatment. The worst outcome is considered as the patients signed "2-3". Each scale range for each time interval evaluated as count of patient and presented as percentage.)
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Rotary handpieces
ACTIVE COMPARATOREr:YAG laser
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients age between 9-12 years old
- Having no systemic condition and ASA 1 healty status
- Having lower permanent first molar teeth with occlusal caries (class 1)
- having no laser treatment before
You may not qualify if:
- having spontaneous tooth pain
- having high dental anxiety
- having no restorative treatment before
- teeth with periapical pathology, a root filling or non-vital teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cukurova University
Adana, 01130, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 23, 2020
Study Completion
September 15, 2020
Last Updated
October 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10