Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation
AWAKECMACTRA
A Randomized Comparison Between the C-MAC and Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes for First-attempt Intubation Success in Awake Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway.
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with anticipated difficult airway are recommended to be managed with an awake tracheal intubation. Initially fibreoptic bronchoscopy was considered the gold standard, but in the last decade videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be an efficacy alternative technique. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis was published investigating the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared with fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation. Eight prospective, randomized studies were included, with different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC, GlideScope, Pentax AWS, McGraft, and Bullard). However, a direct comparison of two different videolaryngoscopes for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway has not been performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 19, 2024
CompletedJanuary 23, 2024
July 1, 2023
1.6 years
June 15, 2022
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage)
To compare the difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage) of different awake videolaryngoscope techniques for tracheal intubation.
during intubation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Difference in the overall success rate (percentage)
during intubation
Number of intubation attempts
during intubation
Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view
during intubation
Difference in the incidence of complications related to intubation (percentage)
Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention
Degree of subjective difficulty experienced by the operator
during intubation
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
C-MAC videolaryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a C-MAC videolaryngoscopy. Spontaneous breathing will be preserved, and the same protocol of sedation plus upper airways topical anesthesia will be applied in both groups.
Airtraq videolaryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. Spontaneous breathing will be preserved, and the same protocol of sedation plus upper airways topical anesthesia will be applied in both groups.
Interventions
Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a C-MAC videolaryngoscopy
Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a Airtraq videolaryngoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring awake intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation for general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- age \<18 years
- refusal of the patient
- patient's respiratory failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15866, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Alhomary M, Ramadan E, Curran E, Walsh SR. Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 Sep;73(9):1151-1161. doi: 10.1111/anae.14299. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
PMID: 29687891BACKGROUNDLewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
PMID: 27844477BACKGROUNDMoore A, Schricker T. Awake videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;32(6):764-768. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000771.
PMID: 31356364BACKGROUNDMoore AR, Schricker T, Court O. Awake videolaryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation of the morbidly obese. Anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;67(3):232-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06979.x.
PMID: 22321077BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor University Of Santiago de Compostela
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2022
First Posted
June 23, 2022
Study Start
June 15, 2022
Primary Completion
January 19, 2024
Study Completion
January 19, 2024
Last Updated
January 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- When available: With publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose
Deidentified participant data How to access data: Requests must be sent to manutabo@yahoo.es When available: With publication Additional Information Who can access the data: Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose Mechanisms of data availability: With investigator support