NCT05428995

Brief Summary

Patients with anticipated difficult airway are recommended to be managed with an awake tracheal intubation. Initially fibreoptic bronchoscopy was considered the gold standard, but in the last decade videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be an efficacy alternative technique. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis was published investigating the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared with fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation. Eight prospective, randomized studies were included, with different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC, GlideScope, Pentax AWS, McGraft, and Bullard). However, a direct comparison of two different videolaryngoscopes for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway has not been performed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2022

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 19, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

intubationdifficult airwayvideolaryngoscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage)

    To compare the difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage) of different awake videolaryngoscope techniques for tracheal intubation.

    during intubation

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Difference in the overall success rate (percentage)

    during intubation

  • Number of intubation attempts

    during intubation

  • Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view

    during intubation

  • Difference in the incidence of complications related to intubation (percentage)

    Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention

  • Degree of subjective difficulty experienced by the operator

    during intubation

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

C-MAC videolaryngoscope

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a C-MAC videolaryngoscopy. Spontaneous breathing will be preserved, and the same protocol of sedation plus upper airways topical anesthesia will be applied in both groups.

Device: C-MAC videolaryngoscope

Airtraq videolaryngoscope

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. Spontaneous breathing will be preserved, and the same protocol of sedation plus upper airways topical anesthesia will be applied in both groups.

Device: Airtraq videolaryngoscope.

Interventions

Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a C-MAC videolaryngoscopy

C-MAC videolaryngoscope

Patients with anticipated difficult airway will be awake intubated with a Airtraq videolaryngoscopy

Airtraq videolaryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years and older
  • Patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring awake intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation for general anesthesia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • age \<18 years
  • refusal of the patient
  • patient's respiratory failure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15866, Spain

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Alhomary M, Ramadan E, Curran E, Walsh SR. Videolaryngoscopy vs. fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 Sep;73(9):1151-1161. doi: 10.1111/anae.14299. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

    PMID: 29687891BACKGROUND
  • Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.

    PMID: 27844477BACKGROUND
  • Moore A, Schricker T. Awake videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;32(6):764-768. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000771.

    PMID: 31356364BACKGROUND
  • Moore AR, Schricker T, Court O. Awake videolaryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation of the morbidly obese. Anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;67(3):232-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06979.x.

    PMID: 22321077BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.

    University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor University Of Santiago de Compostela

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2022

First Posted

June 23, 2022

Study Start

June 15, 2022

Primary Completion

January 19, 2024

Study Completion

January 19, 2024

Last Updated

January 23, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified participant data How to access data: Requests must be sent to manutabo@yahoo.es When available: With publication Additional Information Who can access the data: Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose Mechanisms of data availability: With investigator support

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
When available: With publication
Access Criteria
Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose

Locations