First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
FAIRAiM
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the First-pass Intubation Success of the Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients Requiring General Anaesthesia for Elective Operation.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,586
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In recent decades, numerous videolaryngoscopes have been introduced to facilitate tracheal intubation. However, it remains unclear whether videolaryngoscope will increase the successful tracheal intubation compared with usual Macintosch laryngoscope. Therefore, this pilot study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the first-pass intubation success of the Airtraq laryngoscope versus the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in patients requiring general anesthesia for elective operation, with the aims to examine the feasibility of a large multicentre effectiveness trial by assessing recruitment targets, testing the data completeness, and local incidence of first-pass intubation success.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 12, 2019
November 1, 2019
3.2 years
March 20, 2019
November 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First-pass success in tracheal intubation
Successful tracheal intubation during the first attempt, confirmed by EtCO2 tracing
During tracheal intubation procedure
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to successful tracheal intubation
During tracheal intubation procedure
Hoarseness
At 48 hours after operation
Sore throat
At 48 hours after operation
Use of adjuncts during tracheal intubation
During tracheal intubation procedure
Requirement of additional maneuvers
During tracheal intubation procedure
Study Arms (2)
Airtraq
ACTIVE COMPARATORAirtraq laryngoscope
Macintosh
ACTIVE COMPARATORMacintosh laryngoscope
Interventions
Tracheal intubation performed by attending anesthesiologists using either Airtraq laryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult (\>18years) patients;
- receiving general anaesthesia that requires tracheal intubation
You may not qualify if:
- known or predicted difficult bag-mask ventilation
- patients scheduled for (awake or asleep) fibreoptic intubation
- patients requiring rapid sequence intubation
- language or congnitive problems that preclude adequate informed consent being obtained
- patient or anaesthetist refusal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Tuen Mun Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Mihai R, Blair E, Kay H, Cook TM. A quantitative review and meta-analysis of performance of non-standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibreoptic intubation aids. Anaesthesia. 2008 Jul;63(7):745-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05489.x.
PMID: 18582261BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mathew TV Chan, MBBS
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2019
First Posted
March 25, 2019
Study Start
October 2, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share