Keeping on Course: A Communication-Focused Psychoeducational Program
2 other identifiers
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of Keeping on Course is to develop and test a psychoeducation program to provide dyads facing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with communication skills and strategies that will establish or restore a sense of agency as they cope with MCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2025
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.8 years
June 1, 2022
January 26, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score
Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the Keeping on Course program are assessed with three items from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Items are scored on a 5-point scale where "completely disagree" = 1 and "completely agree" = 5. The total score is the average score of all items and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.
4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score
Appropriateness of the Keeping on Course program is assessed with three items from the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Items are scored on a 5-point scale where "completely disagree" = 1 and "completely agree" = 5. The total score is the average score of all items and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness of the intervention.
4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Awareness, Courage, and Responsiveness Scale Score
The Awareness, Courage, and Responsiveness Scale asks 24 questions to measure awareness of others, self-awareness, courage, and responsiveness towards others. Responses to survey items are given on a 7-point scale where "never true" = 1 and "always true" = 7. The total score ranges from 24 to 168. Higher scores indicate greater expression of interpersonal dynamics of being aware, courageous in uncomfortable situations, and being responsive to the needs of others.
4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Score
Feasibility of the Keeping on Course program is assessed with three items from the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Items are scored on a 5-point scale where "completely disagree" = 1 and "completely agree" = 5. The total score is the average score of all items and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility of the intervention.
4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Attendance
Feasibility of the intervention is assessed with the number of sessions attended.
Up to Week 6
Completion of Homework Assignments
Feasibility of the intervention is assessed with the number of homework assignments completed.
Up to Week 6
Group Participation
Feasibility of the intervention is assessed with the number of participants engaging in group activities.
Up to Week 6
Percent of Participants Completing Surveys
Acceptability of measurements used to understand decision-making in dyads coping with MCI is assessed as the completion rates of each of four instruments. An instrument is considered acceptable if there is a 90% completion rate for an instrument.
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) Score Among Care Partners
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Midlife Development Inventory (MIDI) Sense of Control Scale
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Decision-Making Involvement Scale
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Decision-Making Involvement Measure
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Decision-Making Involvement Measure - Overall Satisfaction
Baseline, 4 weeks post-program, 8 weeks post-program
Study Arms (2)
Keeping on Course Program for Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
EXPERIMENTALPersons with MCI participating in the Keeping on Course program.
Keeping on Course Program for Care Partners of MCI Participants
EXPERIMENTALCare partners participating in the Keeping on Course program with the MCI participant they care for.
Interventions
MCI dyads engaging in the testing aim of the Keeping on Course Program take part in group meetings lasting 90 to 120 minutes over the course of 6 virtual meetings. Participants are asked to take part in structured quantitative interviews at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in a virtual, semi-structured 30-60 minute qualitative interview focused on their experiences in and perceptions of the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Either a person with MCI, defined as a score of 23-27 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or a score of 19-25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or an MCI care partner
- Can read, speak, and understand English
- Have internet connectivity and a separate zoom-enabled device for each dyad member
- Dyads must live together, as this will provide sufficient opportunity for intervention homework and communication practice activities
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- Individuals who are not able to clearly understand and speak English
- Those living with MCI will need to successfully complete a capacity to consent survey to be included in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
- Emory Roybal Center for Dementia Caregiving Masterycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Emory Clinic at Executive Park
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Hepburn, PhD
Emory University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2022
First Posted
June 21, 2022
Study Start
February 8, 2023
Primary Completion
December 8, 2025
Study Completion
December 8, 2025
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available for sharing once the main findings from this study are published.
- Access Criteria
- Data from this pilot study will be available to qualified researchers through a data sharing agreement that is fully consistent with NIH data sharing policies and applicable laws and regulations as well as official policies and practices established. Study data will be deposited in the Roybal Center data repository. Data will be made available to qualified researchers via an NIH-approved data sharing agreement. The data sharing agreement will require: 1. a commitment only to use the data for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; 2. a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and 3. a commitment to destroy or return the data after analyses are completed. Analyses will be up to the discretion of the requesting researcher and restrictions outlined in the data sharing agreement.
The de-identified dataset, including common measures of care partner self-efficacy and mastery, as well as certain demographic data, will be made available for sharing with other researchers.