NCT05411692

Brief Summary

As functional electrical stimulations has evident role in improving motor control in tenodesis function (power and precision grip) but its results are considered to be short term so addition of task oriented approach i.e. motor priming exercises could enhance the treatment effects . Priming is a mechanism that could easily be a part of a restorative occupational therapy approach, is a therapeutic method with the intent to improve function by targeting underlying neural mechanisms (neuroplasticity and motor control). This will yield the long term effects of priming augmented functional electrical stimulations to enhance the tenodesis function of patients with spinal cord injury. Their combination may produce improvement in hand functions dexterity in spinal cord injury patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 20, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Hand Dynamometer

    Used to measure grip strength.The patient squeezes the dynamometer with all of their strength, typically three times with each hand. An average score is then calculated using the measurements from both hands

    6th week

  • Pinch meter

    A pinch meter is a medical instrument that is used to test digital strength in the form of three different types of pinches. It primarily serves as a diagnostic and assessment tool.The therapist takes the average of 3 trials for each type of pinch, alternating from one hand to the other. Positioning during the test should be shoulder adducted, elbow at 90 degrees and forearm in neutral

    6th week

  • The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale

    The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale is a standardized neurological examination used by the rehabilitation team to assess the sensory and motor levels which were affected by the spinal cord injury

    6th week

  • Graded redefined assessment for sensation, strength and prehension tool

    The GRASSP is a clinical impairment measure used for the upper limb after tetraplegia. The measure includes three domains (sensation, strength , prehension) which are important in describing hand function(

    6th week

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Spinal Cord Independence Measure

    6th weeks

Study Arms (3)

Functional electrical stimulations and motor priming exercise

EXPERIMENTAL

Functional electrical stimulations and motor priming exercise • Palmar Grasp (holding a ball) of Lateral Grasp (holding a tray),Tripod grip (thumb, index, and middle finger: holding a pen), Two finger opposition (thumb and index finger: holding a peg, Lateral Pinch (thumb and index finger: holding a credit card), lateral pinch, two fingers (index and middle finger: smoker's grip

Other: Functional electrical stimulations and motor priming exercise

Functional electrical stimulations

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stimulation parameters are (1) balanced, biphasic, current-regulated electrical pulses; (2) pulse amplitude from 8 to 50 mA (typical values 17- 26 mA); (3) pulse width 250 ms; and (4) pulse frequency from 20 to 70 Hz (18). Trancutaneous stimulation will be delivered bilaterally with surface electrodes placed on the volar aspect of each wrist targeting the distribution of the median nerve

Other: Functional electrical stimulations

Convetional phyusical therapy

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The prescription of resistance load for strength training will be performed with fine motor exercise , based on sub maximal repetitions

Other: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

One pair of surface stimulation electrodes is placed on the subject's skin above the flexor digitorum superficialis and the flexor digitorum profundus muscles to generate finger flexion. The Second pair of electrodes is placed on the subject's skin, above the median nerve, to generate thumb flexion. The third pair of electrodes is placed on the subject's skin, above the extensor digitorum muscle, to generate finger extension. Motor priming exercises will be done (functional task practice, FTP) for 20 minutes. Participants will be asked to spend at least 20 minutesDuration of training will be 4 weeks, 5 days per week, one session per day, and one hour per session.

Functional electrical stimulations and motor priming exercise

Stimulation parameters are (1) balanced, biphasic, current-regulated electrical pulses; (2) pulse amplitude from 8 to 50 mA (typical values 17- 26 mA); (3) pulse width 250 ms; and (4) pulse frequency from 20 to 70 Hz (18). Trancutaneous stimulation will be delivered bilaterally with surface electrodes placed on the volar aspect of each wrist targeting the distribution of the median nerve. One pair of surface stimulation electrodes is placed on the subject's skin above the flexor digitorum superficialis and the flexor digitorum profundus muscles to generate finger flexion. The Second pair of electrodes is placed on the subject's skin, above the median nerve, to generate thumb flexion for 20 minutes

Functional electrical stimulations

a structured exercise protocol targeting strength (2 days/week) and endurance (3days/week) training

Convetional phyusical therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Both male and female with age group (15 50)
  • Patient with C6-C7 neurological level of injury
  • Patient with incomplete ASIA- D grading
  • Clinically stable patients with normal vital signs and mental status
  • Patient in acute and sub-acute stage ( usually \< 18 months post injury
  • Patients without active palmer and lateral grasp function (except tenodesis grasp function)
  • Patients having intact wrist extensors in Grade 3 or higher manual muscle test i.e. can perform tenodesis action

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with Neurological level of injury C8 or above
  • Patient with chronic stage \> 18 months
  • Patients with Spastic hands
  • Patients with implants in body
  • Patients with history of Epilepsy
  • Patients with Cardiovascular problems

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lahore general Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):56-87. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30415-0. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

    PMID: 30497965BACKGROUND
  • Jung HY, Lee J, Shin HI. The natural course of passive tenodesis grip in individuals with spinal cord injury with preserved wrist extension power but paralyzed fingers and thumbs. Spinal Cord. 2018 Sep;56(9):900-906. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0137-4. Epub 2018 May 22.

    PMID: 29789707BACKGROUND
  • Peckham PH, Knutson JS. Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:327-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140103.

    PMID: 16004574BACKGROUND
  • Stoykov ME, Corcos DM, Madhavan S. Movement-Based Priming: Clinical Applications and Neural Mechanisms. J Mot Behav. 2017 Jan-Feb;49(1):88-97. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1250716. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

    PMID: 28277966BACKGROUND
  • Vafadar AK, Cote JN, Archambault PS. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in improving clinical outcomes in the upper arm following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:729768. doi: 10.1155/2015/729768. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

    PMID: 25685805BACKGROUND
  • Sivaramakrishnan A, Madhavan S. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with aerobic exercise to optimize cortical priming in stroke. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 May;46(5):426-435. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0677. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

    PMID: 33095999BACKGROUND
  • Gomes-Osman J, Tibbett JA, Poe BP, Field-Fote EC. Priming for Improved Hand Strength in Persons with Chronic Tetraplegia: A Comparison of Priming-Augmented Functional Task Practice, Priming Alone, and Conventional Exercise Training. Front Neurol. 2017 Jan 17;7:242. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00242. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 28144229BACKGROUND
  • Burns AS, Marino RJ, Kalsi-Ryan S, Middleton JW, Tetreault LA, Dettori JR, Mihalovich KE, Fehlings MG. Type and Timing of Rehabilitation Following Acute and Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):175S-194S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217703084. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

    PMID: 29164023BACKGROUND
  • Mangold S, Keller T, Curt A, Dietz V. Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation for grasping in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005 Jan;43(1):1-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101644.

    PMID: 15289804BACKGROUND
  • El Masry WS, Tsubo M, Katoh S, El Miligui YH, Khan A. Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Mar 1;21(5):614-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199603010-00015.

    PMID: 8852318BACKGROUND
  • Popovic MR, Thrasher TA, Adams ME, Takes V, Zivanovic V, Tonack MI. Functional electrical therapy: retraining grasping in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006 Mar;44(3):143-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101822.

    PMID: 16130018BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Binash Afzal, PHD*

    Riphah international university lahore campus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2022

First Posted

June 9, 2022

Study Start

March 15, 2022

Primary Completion

September 20, 2022

Study Completion

November 15, 2022

Last Updated

July 20, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations