NCT06438991

Brief Summary

This prospective clinical study will investigate the ability of different spine imaging characteristics to predict ambulation recovery responsiveness using epidural spinal cord stimulator (SCS) in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Epidural spinal cord stimulation below the level of injury can restore previously lost lower extremity voluntary motor function for some patients. The goal of this study is to establish whether spine imaging can be utilized as a biomarker to predict which patients will respond to spinal cord stimulation.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
25mo left

Started Jul 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Jul 2024Jun 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2024

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 3, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

epidural spinal cord stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of treatment-related adverse events

    The primary endpoint of this study is the safety of stimulation parameters for motor function assessed with the number of adverse events for the duration of the study. Relatedness of adverse events to treatment is determined by the principal investigator.

    0-6 months after baseline

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Muscle Strength

    1-6 months after baseline

  • Neuroimaging volumetric measures

    0-6 months after baseline

  • Voluntary Motor Function

    0-6 months after baseline

  • Optimized stimulation amplitude for voluntary motor function

    1-6 months after baseline

  • Optimized stimulation frequency for voluntary motor function

    1-6 months after baseline

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

All participants

EXPERIMENTAL

Baseline: participants will undergo lower extremity muscle strength testing, electromyography, spine and brain MRI, and complete a battery of questionnaires All participants will undergo a clinically indicated spinal cord stimulator implanted for refractory chronic pain. SCS Optimization phase consists of weekly research visits for 1 month. SCS parameters will be optimized for voluntary control of lower extremity muscles. Individualized Neurorehabilitation phase consists of 4 x weekly visits for 5-months. With the SCS settings turned on for muscle activation, participants will undergo progressive neurorehabilitation by a spinal cord specialized physical therapist. All participants who complete the 6-month timepoint will be invited to continue long-term follow up.

Other: Adjustment of spinal cord stimulation parameters for voluntary motor control

Interventions

All patients will receive a spinal cord stimulator and undergo adjustment of stimulation parameters for optimal voluntary lower extremity motor control during research visits. Muscle strength will be assessed with the stimulation turned on and off.

All participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>18 years
  • Provides informed consent
  • Eligible for and undergoes SCS implant for chronic low back or leg pain refractory to first-line therapy
  • Stable SCI secondary to a single insult
  • C6-T10 level of injury
  • SCI has occurred \>12 months prior to enrollment
  • Chronic low back pain refractory to first-line therapy
  • Current AIS grade B-C, with spared sensation
  • Willingness and ability to adhere to the protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • History or diagnosis of Central Nervous System malignancy
  • Diagnosis that is a contraindication to SCS implantation or surgery
  • Diagnosis that precludes the subject from full participation in physical therapy
  • Known osteopenia/osteoporosis
  • Impairment in post-operative recovery per clinical evaluation by the principal investigator
  • Inability to participate in the protocol, including but not limited to all study visits and assessments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Chalif JI, Chavarro VS, Mensah E, Johnston B, Fields DP, Chalif EJ, Chiang M, Sutton O, Yong R, Trumbower R, Lu Y. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury in Humans: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 14;13(4):1090. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041090.

    PMID: 38398403BACKGROUND
  • Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

    PMID: 30382197BACKGROUND
  • Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

    PMID: 24713270BACKGROUND
  • Calvert JS, Grahn PJ, Strommen JA, Lavrov IA, Beck LA, Gill ML, Linde MB, Brown DA, Van Straaten MG, Veith DD, Lopez C, Sayenko DG, Gerasimenko YP, Edgerton VR, Zhao KD, Lee KH. Electrophysiological Guidance of Epidural Electrode Array Implantation over the Human Lumbosacral Spinal Cord to Enable Motor Function after Chronic Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2019 May 1;36(9):1451-1460. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5921. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

    PMID: 30430902BACKGROUND
  • Darrow D, Balser D, Netoff TI, Krassioukov A, Phillips A, Parr A, Samadani U. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Facilitates Immediate Restoration of Dormant Motor and Autonomic Supraspinal Pathways after Chronic Neurologically Complete Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019 Aug 1;36(15):2325-2336. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6006. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

    PMID: 30667299BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Yi Lu, MD, PhD

    Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Joshua I. Chalif, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Benjamin R Johnston, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All subjects will receive a spinal cord stimulator. Muscle strength will be assessed with the stimulation turned on and off. Parameters for motor function will be assessed with the stimulation turned on and off.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Neurosurgical Trauma, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2024

First Posted

June 3, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

June 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared other than published de-identified data.