Assessment of the Efficacy of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib in the Management of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of liver cancer, which is the 3rd leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The incidence is expected to increase as a consequence of chronic liver disease with its multiple risk factors, including chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, excessive alcohol consumption, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hemochromatosis, and aflatoxin B1.It is estimated that 70%-90% of patients with HCC have chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, which limits the feasibility of surgical procedures in advanced cases. There are limited treatment options for HCC patients who are ineligible for surgical resection. Locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial embolization (TAE), or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), are primarily recommended, and if one of those fail, then systemic therapy is considered. The 2013 Japan Society of Hepatology HCC Guidelines outlined that the factors influencing treatment decisions should be based on the degree of liver damage (Child-Pugh), presence or absence of extrahepatic spread and macrovascular invasion, the number of tumors, and tumor diameter. Sorafenib has been the standard of care since 2007, when the SHARP trial demonstrated that sorafenib improved median overall survival (OS) compared to placebo in patients who had not received prior systemic therapy (10.7 vs 7.9 months, HR =0.69, P\<0.001). In patients from the Asia-Pacific region taking sorafenib, the median improvement in overall survival compared with placebo was 2.3 months (6.5 months vs 4.2 months; HR 0.68; p=0.014). Drug development for hepatocellular carcinoma in the past 10 years has been marked by four failed global phase 3 trials (of sunitinib, brivanib, linifanib, and erlotinib plus sorafenib) that did not show non-inferiority. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has been the only systemic therapy demonstrated to extend overall survibility as a firstline treatment, showing a median improvement of 2.8 months compared with placebo (10.7 months vs. 7.9 months; hazard ratio \[HR\] 0.69; p\\0.001).6 Inpatients from the Asia-Pacific region taking sorafenib, the median OS (mOS) improvement compared with placebo was 2.3 months (HR 0.68; p = 0.014). The use of other molecularly targeted agents has not demonstrated efficacy via non-inferiority or superiority to sorafenib; thus, until the appearance of lenvatinib, sorafenib has also been widely used as the first-line treatment for uHCC patients in Japan. Recently, regorafenib and Nivolumab were approved as a second-line systemic treatment for patients who do not respond to the first-line treatments. Otherwise, best supportive care or participation in clinical trials is recommended in the second-line setting by treatment guidelines. Chemotherapy in combination with sorafenib (doxorubicin) and radioembolization with SIR Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a survival benefit or showed a worse safety profile compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting. Eventually, the PhaseIII non-inferiority REFLECT trial showed that lenvatinib was non-inferior compared to sorafenib.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedMay 26, 2022
May 1, 2022
12 months
November 26, 2020
May 21, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survivability
Overall survivability of hepatocellular carcinoma patients will be assessed and compared between two groups (Lenvatinib group vs Sorafenib group)
From the date of Randomization to next 3 months or till death
Study Arms (2)
Lenvatinib group (Group-A)
EXPERIMENTALPatients diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma will be randomly assigned for treatment with Lenvatinib. Cap. Lenvatinib will be given at doses of 4 mg 12 hourly.
Sorafenib group (Group-B)
EXPERIMENTALPatients diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma will be randomly assigned for treatment with Sorafenib. Tab. Sorafenib will be given at doses of 200 mg 12 hourly.
Interventions
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Diagnosed histologically or cytologically or by imaging criteria with CT or MRI) with no option of resectibility (BCLC stage B or C) 2. Age ≥ 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- \- 1. Patients with very early stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (BCLC stage 0) 2. Patients with early stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (BCLC stage A) 3. Patients with terminal stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (BCLC stage D) 4. Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with obvious invasion to bile duct. 5. Patients who received previous systemic therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
- \. Patients with jaundice (serum bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dl) 8. Patients with aminotransferases ≥ 5ULN 8. Patients with other co-morbid conditions (COPD, CKD, Heart failure, IHD, pregnancy)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Department of Hepatology
Dhaka, 1100, Bangladesh
Sir Salimullah Medical College
Dhaka, 1100, Bangladesh
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad S Hossain, MBBS, MD
Sir Salimullah Medical College
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2020
First Posted
May 26, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- January' 2021 - December'2021
- Access Criteria
- romelssmcmh@gmail.com
After completion of the study and statistical analysis, the study report will be published.