Digital Intervention to Address Stigma Among Pregnant Adolescents Living With HIV
Development of a Digital Intervention to Address Stigma Among Pregnant Unmarried Adolescents Living With HIV
2 other identifiers
interventional
169
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pregnant adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) in Kenya frequently experience stigma and difficulty telling a family member about their HIV and pregnancy status. This study will develop and evaluate a digital intervention for pregnant unmarried ALHIV to address the effects of stigma and strengthen communication skills. Family caregivers are an important yet underappreciated and understudied source of social support for pregnant unmarried ALHIV. The study will also identify acceptable approaches to involve family caregivers in addressing the detrimental effects of the intersecting stigmas faced by pregnant ALHIV. Together, these approaches are expected to improve engagement in PMTCT services among pregnant ALHIV. The study specific aims are to: (1) Develop and evaluate a digital intervention for pregnant unmarried ALHIV aged 15-19 to increase awareness of stigma and its consequences; improve disclosure self-efficacy and skills; and facilitate enlistment of family caregivers as social support allies to enhance uptake of PMTCT services; and (2) Identify acceptable approaches to increase awareness about stigma and enhance skills in communication and provision of social support among family caregivers. We will use data from individual interviews with pregnant ALHIV and joint interviews with pregnant ALHIV/caregiver dyads to develop initial intervention specifications and mock-ups. We will then conduct focus groups to obtain feedback on sample materials in order to refine the materials and develop an intervention prototype. We will then conduct a pilot to evaluate acceptability, usability, and preliminary efficacy of the prototype. All participating adolescents will receive a session in using the digital intervention with a mobile phone or tablet. The research team will ask questions both before the session and two weeks after the session in order to assess the intervention's usability and acceptability and preliminary improvements in the adolescents regarding stigma, disclosure, and social support. We will conduct focus groups with caregivers to identify acceptable approaches to involve them. Data will be used to finalize content and specifications of the digital intervention for pregnant ALHIV and will provide the framework for a future complementary intervention for caregivers, which will both be tested in a larger R34 or R01 trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 12, 2026
CompletedFebruary 12, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.7 years
May 12, 2022
July 11, 2025
January 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
User Version Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) - Objective Quality Measure
Aim 1 Phase 3 Acceptability of Final Prototype. Quantitative measure adapted for this study; overall objective quality (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information); self-report survey items assessing overall objective quality of the digital intervention. Scale title: Adapted User version Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS; Low quality=1, High quality =5). App objective quality mean scores Min=4.25, Max=5.00. Higher scores mean perception of higher quality.
Immediately post-intervention approximately 10 minutes
User Version Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) - Subjective Quality Measure (Composite Measure)
Aim 1 Phase 3 Acceptability of Final Prototype. Quantitative data; overall subjective quality; self-report survey items assessing overall subjective quality of the digital intervention. Scale title: Adapted User version Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS; Low quality=1, High quality =5). App subjective quality mean scores: Min=3.67, Max=5.00. Higher scores indicate perception of higher quality.
Immediately post-intervention approximately 10 minutes
HIV/AIDS Stigma Instrument - People Living With HIV (PWLA)
Aim 1 Phase 3. Change in perception of experienced stigma (e.g., "Someone stopped being my friend.") (Never, Once or twice, Several times, Most of the time)(14 summed items; scale score range 0-42 with higher values indicating more stigma)
Two weeks post-intervention
Internalized Pregnancy-Related Stigma Scale
Aim 1 Phase 3. Change in internalized pregnancy-related stigma among adolescents. Example item:"Becoming pregnant and having a baby as a teen makes me feel ashamed and bad about myself;" Response Options: Agree, Disagree) (4 summed items; scale score range 0-4 with higher values indicating more stigma). Adapted for pregnancy-related stigma from the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale.
Two weeks post-intervention
Self-efficacy to Make an Effective Decision to Disclose HIV Status
Aim 1 Phase 3. Change in the respondent's confidence in making an effective decision to disclose HIV status to a family member. Question Item: "How confident are you that you could make an effective decision of whether to tell a family member that you are HIV-positive?" (1 item; 11-pt scale: 0-10; 0=cannot do, 10=certain can do). Higher scores mean more confidence.
Two weeks post-intervention
Self-efficacy to Make an Effective Decision to Disclose Pregnancy
Aim 1 Phase 3. Change in respondent's confidence in making an effective decision to disclose pregnancy to a family member. Question Item: "How confident are you that you could make an effective decision of whether to tell a family member that you are pregnant?" (1 item, 11-pt scale: 0-10; 0=cannot do, 10=certain can do; higher scores mean higher confidence). Adapted from self-efficacy to make an effective decision to disclose HIV status.
Two weeks post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Self-efficacy for Knowing it is Safe to Disclose HIV Status
Two weeks post-intervention
Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale
Two weeks post-intervention
Response to Stress Questionnaire - HIV/AIDS Stigma: Disengaging Coping Subscale
Two weeks post-intervention
Qualitative Theme, Disclosure Experiences. Sub-Theme: Direct Disclosure
Single interviews were done during Aim 1 Phase 1 over a 4-month period (April - July 2022). Each interview lasted about 1 hour.
Qualitative Theme, Disclosure Experiences. Sub-Theme: Indirect Disclosure
Single interviews were done during Aim 1 Phase 1 over a 4-month period (April - July 2022). Each interview lasted about 1 hour.
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Digital intervention
EXPERIMENTALDigital intervention for pregnant adolescents living with HIV.
Interventions
The newly developed digital intervention uses illustrative characters to deliver didactic content to (1) raise awareness about stigma and its effects and understanding of disclosure and social support's importance, (2) increase self-efficacy and communication skills for disclosure and enlistment of caregivers as social support allies, and (3) tell stories to demonstrate how peers in similar situations have successfully coped with stigma, disclosed their pregnancies and/or HIV, and sought support from caregivers. Each module takes 20-30 minutes to complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Living with HIV
- Pregnant
- Unmarried
- years old
You may not qualify if:
- Participated in a prior study activity
- Does not show adequate understanding of consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Kenya Medical Research Institute - Centre for Global Health Research
Kisumu, 40100, Kenya
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno
- Organization
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno, PhD
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2022
First Posted
May 20, 2022
Study Start
March 30, 2022
Primary Completion
December 14, 2023
Study Completion
December 14, 2023
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Results First Posted
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Because of the sensitive nature of the data and the small sample sizes, we are not planning to share the individual participant data in order to protect the confidentiality of study participants.