Dual Growth Factor (rhTPO + G-CSF) and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease affecting older adults, although optimal strategies for treating such patients remain unclear. This prospective phase II, openlabel, multicenter study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of two hematologic growth factors, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and granulocyte colonystimulating factor (G-CSF), in combination with decitabine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin (D-CTAG regimen) to treat older adults with newly diagnosed AML (Identifier: NCT04168138). The above agents were administered as follows: decitabine (15 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5); low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 q12 h, days 3-9); rhTPO (15,000U daily, days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10-24 or until \>50×109/L platelets); aclarubicin (14 mg/m2 daily, days 3-6); and G-CSF (300 μg daily, days 2-9). We concurrently monitored historic controls treated with decitabine followed by cytarabine, aclarubicin, and G-CSF (D-CAG) only. After the first D-CTAG cycle, the overall response rate (ORR) was 84.2% (16/19), including 13 (73.7%) complete remissions (CRs) and three (15.8%) partial remissions. This CR rate surpassed that of the D-CAG treatment (p \< 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) time in the D-CTAG group was 20.2 months (range, 4-31 months), compared with 14 months in the D-CAG group, and 1-year OS was 78%. The proportion of those experiencing grade III-IV thrombocytopenia was significantly lower for D-CTAG (57.9%) than for D-CAG (88.4%; p \< 0.05). Ultimately, the curative effect of adding rhTPO was not inferior to that of D-CAG, and D-CTAG proved safer for elderly patients, especially in terms of hematologic toxicity. A prospective phase III randomized study is warranted to confirm these observations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 21, 2026
CompletedMay 19, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
May 16, 2022
May 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall survival (OS)
overall survival
2 years after the end of treatment of the last patient enrolled
Study Arms (2)
lderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia DCTAG
EXPERIMENTALdecitabine (15 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5); low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 q12 h, days 3-9); rhTPO (15,000 U daily, days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10-24 or until a platelet count \> 50 × 109/L was observed); aclarubicin (14 mg/m2 daily, days 3-6); and G-CSF (300 μg daily, days 2-9).
lderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
OTHERdecitabine (15 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5); low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 q12 h, days 3-9); aclarubicin (14 mg/m2 daily, days 3-6); and G-CSF (300 μg daily, days 2-9).
Interventions
decitabine (15 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5); low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 q12 h, days 3-9); rhTPO (15,000 U daily, days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10-24 or until a platelet count \> 50 × 109/L was observed); aclarubicin (14 mg/m2 daily, days 3-6); and G-CSF (300 μg daily, days 2-9).
decitabine (15 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5); low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 q12 h, days 3-9); aclarubicin (14 mg/m2 daily, days 3-6); and G-CSF (300 μg daily, days 2-9).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 or above, male or female; Acute Myeloid Leukemia (non-M3) diagnosed according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for myeloid malignancies; Newly diagnosed, no treatment for anti-leukemia; The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) status score is 0 to 3 points; Expected survival time ≥ 3 months; No serious heart, lung, liver or kidney disease; History of no thromboembolism Ability to understand and be willing to sign the informed consent form of this trial.
You may not qualify if:
- used to be allergic to the drugs contained in the protocol or to drugs similar in chemical structure to the test drugs; serious active infections; Patients with extramedullary lesions; Patients who use drugs and long-term alcohol abuse to influence the evaluation of test results; Inability to obtain informed consent and cannot complete the trial treatment and examination procedures because of mental illness or other conditions Patients with clinically significant corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation (male \> 450ms, female \> 470ms), Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Atrial Fibrillation (AF), grade II or higher heart block, Myocardial Infarction (MI) within 1 year, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), coronary heart disease with symptoms who need medical treatment; Abnormal liver function (total bilirubin \> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, Alanine aminotransferase(ALT) / Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal value or ALT / AST in patients with liver invasion \> 5 times the upper limit of normal value of normal), abnormal renal function (serum Creatinine \> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal); The investigator determine that the participants are not suitable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Huihan Wanglead
Study Sites (1)
ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To compensate for the need for an open-label design, the primary outcome data are collected with blinding. The staff responsible for data monitoring and statistician will also be blinded to the treatment groups until the statistical analysis was finalized.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2022
First Posted
May 19, 2022
Study Start
January 21, 2022
Primary Completion
January 21, 2024
Study Completion
January 21, 2026
Last Updated
May 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share