NCT05372393

Brief Summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly appearing entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Treatment options include both non-operative and operative methods. Surgical treatment, carpal tunnel release (CTR), involves division of the transverse carpal ligament. Surgery can be performed under axillary or intravenous block, or general anaesthesia. There are no prior randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing local infiltration anaesthesia to local infiltration anaesthesia augmented with a distal median nerve block in CTR. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether adding a distal median nerve block to local anaesthesia reduces the patient's perceived pain level for up to 72 hours after CTR, compared to using only local anaesthesia, i.e., an anaesthesia mixture injected solely in and around the planned incision and nerve release. The null hypothesis is that the use of distal median nerve block with local anaesthesia does not reduce pain after CTR compared to pure local anaesthesia. PERSONNEL (carPal tunnEl ReleaSe lOcal iNfiltratioN mEdian bLockade) is a double-blinded, i.e., patient and investigators, RCT in patients with CTS. Patients will be randomly divided into two parallel trial groups, 1:1 in size to each other. Fifty-nine patients will be needed for each group to have adequate power. The primary outcome is the pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure during the first 72 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include patient-rated outcome measures, safety, the entire consumption of pain killers after the surgery during the first 72 hours postoperatively, pain of performing the anaesthesia, and pain during and after the operation. No trial comparing local anaesthesia to local anaesthesia augmented with distal median nerve block has been published before. There is also no trial noting individual tolerance to pain. The quality of the median nerve block at the wrist has been achieved by using sensory or sensory-motor nerve stimulation and has been proven effective. This increases trust in the effectiveness of the treatment method, but it still needs to be adequately proven which is the goal of this trial.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2022

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndromecarpal tunnel releaselocal anaesthesiasurgerywide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquetnerve block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The investigators measure the pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure every fourth hour while awake until third night postoperatively using VAS. The first assessment is performed four hours after the surgery. The mean VAS is calculated from all time points over the 72-hour period. The Visual analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Postoperatively during the first 72 hours after the operation

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Pressure pain (VAS)

    Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  • Burning pain (VAS)

    Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  • Needle sting pain (VAS)

    Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  • Total pain during the injection of the anaesthetic solution (VAS)

    Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  • Worst pain during the operation (VAS)

    Immediately after the operation

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the control group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia.

Procedure: Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

EXPERIMENTAL

The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the experimental group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia and distal median nerve block.

Procedure: Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

Interventions

The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate (Natriumbicarbonate Braun 75mg/ml), 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline 1% (Lidocain cum adrenalin 10 mg/ml), 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenaline 0.5% (Marcain cum adrenalin 5mg/ml +5 µg/ml). The anaesthetic cocktail must be prepared in the above-mentioned order to avoid possible precipitation. A 24-gauge hypodermic needle and 10 ml syringe are used to inject the solution. The care provider pinches from the area of median nerve blockade prior to performing local anaesthesia. All the anaesthetic solution is injected locally. Additional anaesthetic solution can be injected locally if necessary.

Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate (Natriumbicarbonate Braun 75mg/ml), 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline 1% (Lidocain cum adrenalin 10 mg/ml), 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenaline 0.5% (Marcain cum adrenalin 5mg/ml +5 µg/ml). The anaesthetic cocktail must be prepared in the above-mentioned order to avoid possible precipitation. A 24-gauge hypodermic needle and 10 ml syringe are used to inject the solution. Half of the anaesthetic solution is injected into the median nerve area 5-7 cm proximally from the distal wrist crease. The other half is injected locally. Additional anaesthetic solution can be injected locally if necessary.

Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • CTS verified by nerve conduction studies
  • Symptoms suitable for CTS

You may not qualify if:

  • Recurrent CTS
  • Peripheral neuropathies
  • Known allergy to the trial drugs
  • Profound cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kuopio University hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery

Kuopio, Northern Savonia, 70210, Finland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (25)

  • Shi Q, MacDermid JC. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Apr 11;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-17.

    PMID: 21477381BACKGROUND
  • Piazzini DB, Aprile I, Ferrara PE, Bertolini C, Tonali P, Maggi L, Rabini A, Piantelli S, Padua L. A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Apr;21(4):299-314. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077294.

    PMID: 17613571BACKGROUND
  • Keir PJ, Rempel DM. Pathomechanics of peripheral nerve loading. Evidence in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2005 Apr-Jun;18(2):259-69. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.001.

    PMID: 15891983BACKGROUND
  • Kozak A, Schedlbauer G, Wirth T, Euler U, Westermann C, Nienhaus A. Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 1;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0685-0.

    PMID: 26323649BACKGROUND
  • Padua L, Di Pasquale A, Pazzaglia C, Liotta GA, Librante A, Mondelli M. Systematic review of pregnancy-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Nov;42(5):697-702. doi: 10.1002/mus.21910.

    PMID: 20976778BACKGROUND
  • Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002 Jan 22;58(2):289-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.289.

    PMID: 11805259BACKGROUND
  • Shiri R, Pourmemari MH, Falah-Hassani K, Viikari-Juntura E. The effect of excess body mass on the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of 58 studies. Obes Rev. 2015 Dec;16(12):1094-104. doi: 10.1111/obr.12324. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

    PMID: 26395787BACKGROUND
  • Shiri R. Hypothyroidism and carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Dec;50(6):879-83. doi: 10.1002/mus.24453. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

    PMID: 25204641BACKGROUND
  • Pourmemari MH, Shiri R. Diabetes as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12855. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

    PMID: 26173490BACKGROUND
  • Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, Ramos RM, Dos Santos Neto FC, Silva JB. Carpal tunnel syndrome - Part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis). Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Aug 20;49(5):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.08.001. eCollection 2014 Sep-Oct.

    PMID: 26229841BACKGROUND
  • Genova A, Dix O, Saefan A, Thakur M, Hassan A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7333.

    PMID: 32313774BACKGROUND
  • Kim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, Jeon IH. Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):253-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.253. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

    PMID: 25177448BACKGROUND
  • Wang L. Guiding Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Nov;29(4):751-760. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

    PMID: 30293628BACKGROUND
  • Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1273-1284. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PMID: 27751557BACKGROUND
  • Wipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Dec 15;94(12):993-999.

    PMID: 28075090BACKGROUND
  • Delaunay L, Chelly JE. Blocks at the wrist provide effective anesthesia for carpal tunnel release. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jul-Aug;48(7):656-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016199.

    PMID: 11495872BACKGROUND
  • Cranford CS, Ho JY, Kalainov DM, Hartigan BJ. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Sep;15(9):537-48. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200709000-00004.

    PMID: 17761610BACKGROUND
  • Shiri R. Arthritis as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;45(5):339-46. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1114141. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

    PMID: 27022991BACKGROUND
  • Ozdag Y, Hu Y, Hayes DS, Manzar S, Akoon A, Klena JC, Grandizio LC. Sensitivity and Specificity of Examination Maneuvers for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42383. eCollection 2023 Jul.

    PMID: 37621797BACKGROUND
  • Iqbal HJ, Doorgakant A, Rehmatullah NNT, Ramavath AL, Pidikiti P, Lipscombe S. Pain and outcomes of carpal tunnel release under local anaesthetic with or without a tourniquet: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Oct;43(8):808-812. doi: 10.1177/1753193418778999. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

    PMID: 29871567BACKGROUND
  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

    PMID: 16000093BACKGROUND
  • Jarvinen TL, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Malmivaara A, Paavola M, Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

    PMID: 24560088BACKGROUND
  • Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2020 Feb 5;368:m358. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m358. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32024659BACKGROUND
  • Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):927-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

    PMID: 19535272BACKGROUND
  • Heikkinen N, Nietosvaara Y, Reito A, Sirola J, Hytonen M, Savolainen A, Raisanen MP. Carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia with or without distal median nerve block: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. Scand J Surg. 2025 Mar;114(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/14574969241277028. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Median NeuropathyMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNerve Compression SyndromesCumulative Trauma DisordersSprains and StrainsWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Prof.

    Kuopio University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Noora Heikkinen, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Masking is double blinded (patient and investigators). The trial patients are blinded to the randomization. They can't see to the operation field. In the local anaesthesia group care provider pinches from the area of median nerve blockade prior to performing local anaesthesia.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two concurrent study groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2022

First Posted

May 12, 2022

Study Start

September 21, 2022

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

This trial will share data with researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal after its completion, as well as with reviewers of the journal where the trial results will be published, if necessary.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be available for 15 years after the study has ended.
Access Criteria
Request must come from an EU/ETA country. The investigators do not share data outside these countries.

Locations