The Impact of Feedback Informed Treatment in Floating Support Service
FIT
1 other identifier
interventional
1,162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) is a systematic feedback method. FIT is based on two simple questionnaires and aims to assess and improve the effectiveness of therapeutic treatment. Treatment outcomes are assessed with the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a four-item self-report instrument measuring client functioning in the area of quality of life. Therapeutic alliance is assessed using the four-item Session Rating Scale (SRS). In FIT the feedback from the client is used to continuous adjustment and improvement of therapy. SFI will study the effect of using feedback in social work with floated support in the municipality of Copenhagen. Floating Support is a service that provides housing related support to vulnerable citizens to enable them to maintain their independence in their own home. The project is based on three different types of floating support. The aim of floating support is to improve the citizen's mental, physical and social well-being and thereby makes it more likely that the citizen can live independently at home. The study is a randomized controlled trial in which half of the caseworkers are allocated to be trained in the use of FIT, while the other half serves as a control group and will continue to work as usual. SFI is studying whether FIT can help to improve the impact of the floating support service on the citizen's mental, physical and social well-being and the citizens' likelihood of living in their own homes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable quality-of-life
Started May 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2022
CompletedApril 27, 2023
July 1, 2016
1.4 years
July 8, 2016
April 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
WHO5 wellbeing scale
The investigators measured the participants wellbeing using the WHO5 wellbeing scale
1-15 month after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Drop outs
1-15 month after baseline
Length of floating support service
1-15 month after baseline
Successful support
1-15 month after baseline
Number of eviction cases
1-15 month after baseline
General health
1-15 month after baseline
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment group
EXPERIMENTALClients in the treatment group received the usual floating support service as described for the control group together with feedback. The support workers received feedback from the clients through the ORS and SRS scales of the feedback tool (Bargmann and Robinson 2011). The support worker evaluated the progress of the outcome for the client and the alliance between the support worker and the client from session to session.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONClients in the control group received the usual floating support service without Feedback. Therefore, there was no systematic feedback between clients and support workers in the control group. The service was provided in the clients' homes, and there was no fixed limit of sessions for the support. The support covered any problem, including setting up tenancies, working with clients around practical things, so they could live independently, making sure that clients received all relevant benefits and helping clients with access to physical and mental health services. Some support workers saw their clients on a weekly basis, but there was a large variation in the frequency of meetings. Furthermore, the duration of the support service varied, from a few weeks to several years.
Interventions
FIT is based on two simple questionnaires and aims to assess and improve the effectiveness of therapeutic treatment. Treatment outcomes are assessed with the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), a four-item self-report instrument measuring client functioning in the area of quality of life. Therapeutic alliance is assessed using the four-item Session Rating Scale (SRS). In FIT the feedback from the client is used to continuous adjustment and improvement of therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Citizens who will receive floating support at the municipality of Copenhagen
You may not qualify if:
- Citizens who refuses to get the support. If the caseworkers do not think the citizen will need further support.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SFI the Danish National Centre for Social Research
Copenhagen, DK-1052, Denmark
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kræn B Jensen, PhD
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2016
First Posted
May 3, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 12, 2016
Study Completion
September 12, 2016
Last Updated
April 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2016-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share