Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Of Oral Health-Related Quality Of Life In Patients Wearing Vacuum Formed Thermoplastic Retainers Constructed On Conventional Stone Models And On 3D Reconstructed Orthodontic Study Model
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In dentistry, 3D printing technology is gaining interest. One of the potential application is to construct appliances on 3D reconstructed study models. The purpose of this study is to compare vacuum formed thermoplastic orthodontic retainers (VFR) constructed on conventional orthodontic study models and reconstructed 3D study models by assessing the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instrument, Little's Irregularity Index (LII) and compliance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable quality-of-life
Started Oct 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2017
CompletedApril 9, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.3 years
May 8, 2016
April 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oral Health-Related Quality Of Life
6 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Little's Irregularity Index
6 month
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient's compliance on wearing orthodontic retainers
6 month
Study Arms (2)
Conventional
EXPERIMENTALT1-T2 : VFR constructed on conventional study model T2-T3 : VFR constructed on 3D reconstructed study model
3D
EXPERIMENTALT1-T2 : VFR constructed on 3D reconstructed study model T2-T3 :VFR constructed on conventional study model
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fixed appliance treatment following both arches;
- indicated for vacuum formed thermoplastic retainers as retention phase in treatment plan;
You may not qualify if:
- single-arch or sectional fixed appliance treatment,
- hypodontia requiring tooth replacement on the retainer as a temporary measure,
- undergone rapid maxillary expansion,
- indicated for double retention regime (bonded retainers),
- early debonding patients.
- patients intending to relocate within the study period
- patient with learning difficulties and can't read written instructions/questionnaire in English or Malay
- patient with cleft lip or palate
- has undergone surgical treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Related Publications (1)
Mohd Tahir N, Wan Hassan WN, Saub R. Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover clinical study. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Aug 8;41(4):370-380. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy063.
PMID: 30321319DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan, BDS
University of Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2016
First Posted
August 15, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 30, 2017
Study Completion
March 30, 2017
Last Updated
April 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04