Effects of AlignBabyCleft (ABaCleft)

NCT05357092 | Not Yet Recruiting DMC FDA Device

• 1 other identifier: The 360º Cleft Project -ABa
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Since the appearance of presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) as a treatment for patients with cleft lip and palate ( CLP) , numerous techniques have been described with the aim of aligning the displaced alveolar segments and restoring the position of the lateral cartilage, thus improving the results of primary surgery. Currently, the most used technique in the different protocols is the nasoalveolar molding (NAM) described by Grayson, from which variants and modifications have emerged in order to improve its results and provide greater comfort for both the patient and their caregivers. However, the main drawback of traditional acrylic NAM is the need for sequential addition of acrylic to reduce the size of the indentation. These weekly adjustments consume time and resources for the caregiver and the orthodontist. Likewise, it has been observed that acrylic resin can cause inflammation, irritation and gingival ulceration due to excessive pressure. PSIO treatment in newborns is a complex procedure that could benefit from simplification through digitization, providing accuracy and precision, avoiding risks such as respiratory obstruction and cyanosis that can be produced by taking impressions with alginates or silicones, most of them needing to be performed under general anesthesia. Until now, infant care has been left out of such digitization, despite the fact that the majority of babies who need early orthodontic treatment often suffer from craniofacial disorders. However, in recent years numerous advances have been made in this type of treatment, both in taking records, and in the application of more physiological, lighter and constant forces, providing greater comfort, better acceptance and less pain for the patient . These changes represent a great advance applicable to patients with CLP.

Conditions

Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate

Keywords

"cleft lip"; " Cleft palate"; "presurgical orthopedics"

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Inter arch dimensions

  For the analysis of inter-arch dimensions and their clinical significance, 15 arch analysis variables will be studied. An intraoral scan of the patient will be performed to obtain the digitized models in different phases of the treatment. Before the start of treatment with PSIO (0 months), before lip closure (3 months), before palate closure surgery (6 months). The following variables will be recorded anonymously for each patient: * Measurements of arch width: Transverse dimension ( measured in millimeters). * Measurementes of arch depth: Sagital dimension ( mesaured in millimeters). * Alveolar arch length (measured in millimeters). * Arch circumference ( measured in millimeters). * Measurements of alignment of the segments ( measured in millimeters).

  1 year ( Primary completion)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Positive aspects for caregivers

  1 year ( primary completion)

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients treated with clear aligners to bring cleft segments closer previous to primary lip surgery. An average of 15 aligners will be needed although it depends on the cleft.

Device: Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement

Gold Standard

NO INTERVENTION

The reference therapeutic action (no pre-surgical orthopedic intervention previous to primary lip surgery)

Interventions

Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement DEVICE

A digital 3D model obtained with a 3D scanner: (T1,baseline), (T2, aprox 8 weeks), and at the end of othopedic treatment previous to primary lip surgery (T3, aprox 16 weeks). Once a week, clinical check.

Also known as: Clear Aligners

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 7 Days - 1 Month
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• Patients selected for the clinical trial must meet these criteria after randomization:
• All patients born at term, without any syndrome associated with CLP, aged between 7 days and one month of life, referred from the different hospitals of the Spanish Health System, will be included in the study.
• No distinction will be made on the basis of race or ethnic group to which the participants belong.
• Any patient will be discriminated due to distance from their place of residence.
• Participants must agree to attend regular check-ups.
• All patients who agree to be part of the experimental study must previously sign the specific informed consent designed for this purpose.

You may not qualify if:

• Caregivers who are not fluent in the Spanish language will be excluded in order to understand and assimilate all the instructions provided for treatment compliance.
• Patients who do not comply with the regimen of visits to the orthodontic department, and for whom a correct control of the evolution of the treatment cannot be guaranteed, will be excluded from the study.
• Patients with soft tissue bands should also be excluded from our study.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Universidad Complutense de Madrid: lead

Related Publications (10)

• Allareddy V, Shusterman S, Ross E, Palermo V, Ricalde P. Dentofacial Orthopedics for the Cleft Patient: The Latham Approach. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 May;32(2):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

  PMID: 32081579 RESULT

• Ball JV, DiBiase DD, Sommerlad BC. Transverse maxillary arch changes with the use of preoperative orthopedics in unilateral cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Nov;32(6):483-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0483_tmacwt_2.3.co_2.

  PMID: 8547288 RESULT

• Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A. A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000096710.08123.93.

  PMID: 14707617 RESULT

• Fuchigami T, Kimura N, Kibe T, Tezuka M, Amir MS, Suga H, Takemoto Y, Hashiguchi M, Maeda-Iino A, Nakamura N. Effects of pre-surgical nasoalveolar moulding on maxillary arch and nasal form in unilateral cleft lip and palate before lip surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Nov;20(4):209-215. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12199. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

  PMID: 28921849 RESULT

• Adali N, Mars M, Petrie A, Noar J, Sommerlad B. Presurgical orthopedics has no effect on archform in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Jan;49(1):5-13. doi: 10.1597/11-030. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

  PMID: 21823827 RESULT

• Mars M, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):405-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0405_asciso_2.3.co_2.

  PMID: 1472517 RESULT

• Prahl C, Prahl-Andersen B, Van't Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Presurgical orthopedics and satisfaction in motherhood: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):284-8. doi: 10.1597/07-045.1.

  PMID: 18452361 RESULT

• Al Khateeb KA, Fotouh MA, Abdelsayed F, Fahim F. Short-Term Efficacy of Presurgical Vacuum Formed Nasoalveolar Molding Aligners on Nose, Lip, and Maxillary Arch Morphology in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Jul;58(7):815-823. doi: 10.1177/1055665620966189. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

  PMID: 33107321 RESULT

• Gong X, Dang R, Xu T, Yu Q, Zheng J. Full Digital Workflow of Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):367-371. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006258.

  PMID: 32049908 RESULT

• Batra P, Gribel BF, Abhinav BA, Arora A, Raghavan S. OrthoAligner "NAM": A Case Series of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) Using Clear Aligners. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 May;57(5):646-655. doi: 10.1177/1055665619889807. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

  PMID: 31795731 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lip Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Mouth Abnormalities; Stomatognathic System Abnormalities; Congenital Abnormalities; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Jaw Abnormalities; Jaw Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Maxillofacial Abnormalities; Craniofacial Abnormalities; Musculoskeletal Abnormalities

Study Officials

• ROSA YAÑEZ VICO

  COMPLUTENSE UNIVERITY OF MADRID

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

ROSA YAÑEZ VICO

CONTACT

913941982; rosayanez@ucm.es

ANA RABAL SOLANS

CONTACT

915756135; anarabal@ucm.es

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 22, 2022
• First Posted: May 2, 2022
• Study Start: November 21, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): November 21, 2027
• Study Completion (Estimated): November 1, 2028
• Last Updated: April 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share