Alveolar Bone Grafting Outcome Between Patient With and Without Orthodontic Treatment
The Difference in the Surgical Outcome of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Between Patients With and Without Pre-Alveolar Bone Graft Orthodontic Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is an essential part of the surgical management of cleft lip and palate patients. This procedure could obliterate oronasal fistula, stabilize dental arch, offer bone matrix for adjacent teeth eruption. Moreover, by obliterating oronasal fistula, we stop the chronic irritation of nasal mucosa by oral content. Hence, the symptoms of rhinorrhea or nasal obstruction could be improved. This dental arch defect could predispose further dental arch medial collapse. Without alveolar bone grafting the dental arch is not stable, dental movement during orthodontic treatment is limited and dental arch expansion is not possible. Previous to operation, the patient suffered from dental crowding and dental inclination toward to the cleft. This produces a difficult dental hygiene and predispose to dental caries and gingivitis. Pre-operative orthodontics treatment is advised in many centers. By aligned the teeth previous to surgery, with a better dental hygiene, we purpose that the infection rate will be reduced and success rate will be better. The Purpose of this study is to determine whether pre-operative orthopedic treatment will affect secondary alveolar bone grafting outcome and to assess the nasal change after alveolar bone graft.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedMay 27, 2015
February 1, 2015
4.4 years
February 17, 2015
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pre-orthodontic alveolar bone defect
CT scan, measurement of alveolar bone cleft defect volume
Before surgical and orthodontic treatment, A expected average of 6 months before surgery
Pre-surgical alveolar bone defect
CT scan, measurement of alveolar bone cleft defect volume
Before surgical treatment (alveolar bone cleft), a expected average of 6 months of orthodontic treatment
Alveolar bone graft survival
CT scan, measurement of volume of bone graft filling the alveolar bone cleft
A expected average of 6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Infection rate
up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Orthodontic treatment arm
EXPERIMENTALPrevious to the surgical alveolar bone grafting, orthodontic treatment is performed several months before surgery
No orthodontic treatment arm
NO INTERVENTIONNo orthodontic treatment previous to surgical alveolar bone grafting
Interventions
Braces on the upper dental arch previous to surgical alveolar bone grafting. the goal is optimizing the structure of dental-alveolar structure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral complete cleft lip patients
- Alveolar bone cleft diagnosed with conventional radiographic study
- Patients at the stage of mixed dentition.
- Informed consent signed by the parents or custodians.
You may not qualify if:
- Presentation of other craniofacial anomalies.
- Parents or custodians who do not agreed to this procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Abyholm FE, Bergland O, Semb G. Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. A surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15(2):127-40. doi: 10.3109/02844318109103425. No abstract available.
PMID: 7041248BACKGROUNDBoyne PJ, Sands NR. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J Oral Surg. 1972 Feb;30(2):87-92. No abstract available.
PMID: 4550446BACKGROUNDBajaj AK, Wongworawat AA, Punjabi A. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg. 2003 Nov;14(6):840-6. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200311000-00005.
PMID: 14600625BACKGROUNDda Silva Filho OG, Boiani E, de Oliveira Cavassan A, Santamaria M Jr. Rapid maxillary expansion after secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with alveolar cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 May;46(3):331-8. doi: 10.1597/07-205.1. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
PMID: 19642749BACKGROUNDSato Y, Grayson BH, Garfinkle JS, Barillas I, Maki K, Cutting CB. Success rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty with and without secondary bone grafts compared with secondary alveolar bone grafts alone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Apr;121(4):1356-1367. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000302461.56820.c9.
PMID: 18349656BACKGROUNDHsieh CH, Ko EW, Chen PK, Huang CS. The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty on facial growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Sep;47(5):439-46. doi: 10.1597/08-207.
PMID: 20180706BACKGROUNDWitherow H, Cox S, Jones E, Carr R, Waterhouse N. A new scale to assess radiographic success of secondary alveolar bone grafts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 May;39(3):255-60. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2002_039_0255_anstar_2.0.co_2.
PMID: 12019000BACKGROUNDBergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J. 1986 Jul;23(3):175-205.
PMID: 3524905BACKGROUNDJia YL, Fu MK, Ma L. Long-term outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with various types of cleft. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug;44(4):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
PMID: 16107298BACKGROUNDCraven C, Cole P, Hollier L Jr, Stal S. Ensuring success in alveolar bone grafting: a three-dimensional approach. J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jul;18(4):855-9. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31806849fa.
PMID: 17667677BACKGROUNDEnemark H, Sindet-Pedersen S, Bundgaard M. Long-term results after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Nov;45(11):913-9. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90439-3.
PMID: 3312537BACKGROUNDSindet-Pedersen S, Enemark H. Comparative study of secondary and late secondary bone-grafting in patients with residual cleft defects. Short-term evaluation. Int J Oral Surg. 1985 Oct;14(5):389-98. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80071-5.
PMID: 3932232BACKGROUNDHonma K, Kobayashi T, Nakajima T, Hayasi T. Computed tomographic evaluation of bone formation after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Oct;57(10):1209-13. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90488-3.
PMID: 10513867BACKGROUNDTai CC, Sutherland IS, McFadden L. Prospective analysis of secondary alveolar bone grafting using computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Nov;58(11):1241-9; discussion 1250. doi: 10.1053/joms.2000.16623.
PMID: 11078135BACKGROUNDHamada Y, Kondoh T, Noguchi K, Iino M, Isono H, Ishii H, Mishima A, Kobayashi K, Seto K. Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Mar;42(2):128-37. doi: 10.1597/03-035.1.
PMID: 15748103BACKGROUNDWaitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Mar;29(2):112-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0112_csmboc_2.3.co_2.
PMID: 1571344BACKGROUNDGoudy S, Lott D, Burton R, Wheeler J, Canady J. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: outcomes, revisions, and new applications. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Nov;46(6):610-2. doi: 10.1597/08-126.1. Epub 2009 May 19.
PMID: 19860505BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen, M.D.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2015
First Posted
May 27, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02