Prospective Low Dose CT for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty/Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Prospective Comparison of Simulated Low Dose Computed Tomography to Conventional Dose Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Glenoid Anatomy in Shoulder Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, departmental funded study examining the outcomes of simulated Low Dose CT scans compared to Conventional Dose CT scans in patients who present to Duke University for total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 19, 2023
CompletedDecember 14, 2023
December 1, 2023
8 months
April 22, 2022
December 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Low Dose CT Images of Sufficient Pre-operative Planning Quality
Low Dose CT Images will be compared to a standard dose to assess image quality.
Day 1
Glenoid Version
Representative CT images will be used to measure the version of each shoulder for preoperative purposes.
Day 1
Glenoid Inclination
Representative CT images will be used to measure the inclination of each shoulder for preoperative purposes.
Day 1
Humeral Head Subluxation
Representative CT images will be used to measure the humeral head subluxation of each shoulder for preoperative purposes.
Day 1
Implant Selection
Representative CT images will be used to determine the implant selection for preoperative purposes.
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Patients planning for total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Adult patients who are planning to undergo a total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Retrospective group of patients who have already undergone preoperative planning
Retrospective cohort of patients who have undergone preoperative planning with a conventional shoulder CT for total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Interventions
Briefly, a conventional CT scan will be conducted, with scan images representing a reconstruction of simultaneous scans at two sensors. L-CT images will be derived from single source data (ie the scan data gathered by one of the emitters rather than a reconstruction from both).
Eligibility Criteria
All individuals who are scheduled for a shoulder CT for the purpose of preoperative planning for a total shoulder arthroplasty are eligible to be included in this study assuming they meet the eligibility requirements as listed above.
You may qualify if:
- Subjects are planned to undergo total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty
- Subject must be 18 years or older
- Subjects who have capacity to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who are pregnant
- Subjects under the age of 18
- Subjects who do not have the capacity to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27701, United States
Related Publications (6)
Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1882-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01199.
PMID: 19651945BACKGROUNDIannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET. Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):651-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00493.
PMID: 25878309BACKGROUNDYu L, Shiung M, Jondal D, McCollough CH. Development and validation of a practical lower-dose-simulation tool for optimizing computed tomography scan protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):477-87. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318258e891.
PMID: 22805680BACKGROUNDBoileau P, Cheval D, Gauci MO, Holzer N, Chaoui J, Walch G. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 3;100(1):57-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01122.
PMID: 29298261BACKGROUNDTipnis SV, Spampinato MV, Hungerford J, Huda W. Thyroid Doses and Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Neck CT Examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):1064-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13102.
PMID: 25905942BACKGROUNDMaurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW, Wirth SH, Djahangiri A, Jost B, Gerber C. Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
PMID: 22036540BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Klifto, MD
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2022
First Posted
April 28, 2022
Study Start
November 21, 2022
Primary Completion
July 19, 2023
Study Completion
September 19, 2023
Last Updated
December 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data is not planned to be shared outside of the collaborators of this project within the Duke University Medical Center. The data will only be reviewed by the study personnel listed on the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and not intended to be shared with an external institution or industry. However, when submitting data for manuscripts and publication purposes, all data will be deidentified of any public health information. All Protected Health Information (PHI) will be kept in a locked cabinet in the PI's office at Duke University and/or in a protected/encrypted folder in a file separate from the study information. Data will be analyzed by study team members using a computer that is password protected, and stored securely in encrypted Duke servers. Study files will be backed up onto Dr. Klifto's folder in a secure server provided to faculty in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. The subjects will not be identified in any reports or publications from this study.