Evaluation of the Abutment Type Following Oral Implants in Terms of the Surrounding Bone Height
Evaluation of Two Different Types of Abutments on Post-prosthesis Bone Resorption: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiological Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare two different types of abutments (molded abutments and computer-designed 3D printed abutments) in terms of the amount of bone loss, and depth of periodontal pockets around the implant during different periods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2022
CompletedMay 4, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.3 years
April 22, 2022
April 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the crestal bone height
It Is the loss of bone that occurred around the dental implant neck after fixing the final prosthesis (abutment and crown). A periapical radiograph is going to be taken using a digital intra-oral sensor with a special holder in a parallel way, to measure the changes that occurred at the level of the bone around the implant depending on MBLS concept taking two referring points from the neck of the abutment to the first match of the bone with the abutment using special programs on computer (Photoshop) during different periods.
T1:3 months after cementation, T2: 6 months after cementation, T3: 1 year after cementation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in the depth of periodontal pockets
T1: direct after cementation, T2:3 months after cementation, T3: 6 months after cementation, T4: 1 year after cementation
Study Arms (2)
Molded abutment
ACTIVE COMPARATORA plastic abutment that is provided by the implant manufacturer will be used. This abutment will be modified using wax, and then it will be dismantled, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture. A plastic abutment that the implant manufacturer provides will be used. This abutment will be modified using wax, and then it will be dismantled, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture.
3D printed abutment
EXPERIMENTALThe customised abutment will be made using a laser printer with a Cr-Co mixture after being designed using a special computer program.
Interventions
The waxed plastic abutment will dismantle, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture then it will be trimmed to make it ready to make the permanent restoration over it. The prostheses will be cemented above the abutment using dual-cure resin cement then the final restoration (crown and abutment) will be fixed using a screw-retained manner.
A marker or Scan body appropriate for the type of implant will be placed on the laboratory implant substitute, a digital scan of the marker will be done in the lab, and the scanned image will be transferred to a computer design software where the prosthesis is designed, In the printing phase, the final prosthesis will be manufactured using a stepwise metal powder supply and a laser fusion process. Making the abutment ready to make the permanent restoration over it. The prostheses will be cemented above the abutment using dual-cure resin cement then the final restoration (crown and abutment) will be fixed using a screw-retained manner.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient's age is greater than 20 years and younger than 50
- Good oral health
- Absence of systemic diseases that may affect the healing of surrounding tissues, such as diabetes.
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of non-functional habits such as stridor
- Acute or acute periodontitis, previous loss of implants
- Poor general health conditions
- Previous radiotherapy in the head and neck area
- Mental incompetence
- Orthodontic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Damascus
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Barbin T, Veloso DV, Del Rio Silva L, Borges GA, Presotto AGC, Barao VAR, Mesquita MF. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Aug;108:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103821. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
PMID: 32469723BACKGROUNDBae S, Hong MH, Lee H, Lee CH, Hong M, Lee J, Lee DH. Reliability of Metal 3D Printing with Respect to the Marginal Fit of Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;13(21):4781. doi: 10.3390/ma13214781.
PMID: 33114737BACKGROUNDJang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
PMID: 31027960BACKGROUNDRamalho I, Witek L, Coelho PG, Bergamo E, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante EA. Influence of Abutment Fabrication Method on 3D Fit at the Implant-Abutment Connection. Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Nov/Dec;33(6):641-647. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6574.
PMID: 33284906BACKGROUNDChou WT, Chuang CC, Wang YB, Chiu HC. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257158. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34529710BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad Anas Almodalal, DDS,MSc
Department of fixed prosthodontics , Damascus University, Syria
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Luai Morad, DDS,MSc,PhD
Department of fixed prosthodontics , Damascus University, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2022
First Posted
April 28, 2022
Study Start
September 2, 2020
Primary Completion
December 11, 2021
Study Completion
March 23, 2022
Last Updated
May 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share