NCT05350293

Brief Summary

Compare two different types of abutments (molded abutments and computer-designed 3D printed abutments) in terms of the amount of bone loss, and depth of periodontal pockets around the implant during different periods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2020

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 11, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 23, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 4, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

dental implant3D printed abutmentmolded abutment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the crestal bone height

    It Is the loss of bone that occurred around the dental implant neck after fixing the final prosthesis (abutment and crown). A periapical radiograph is going to be taken using a digital intra-oral sensor with a special holder in a parallel way, to measure the changes that occurred at the level of the bone around the implant depending on MBLS concept taking two referring points from the neck of the abutment to the first match of the bone with the abutment using special programs on computer (Photoshop) during different periods.

    T1:3 months after cementation, T2: 6 months after cementation, T3: 1 year after cementation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the depth of periodontal pockets

    T1: direct after cementation, T2:3 months after cementation, T3: 6 months after cementation, T4: 1 year after cementation

Study Arms (2)

Molded abutment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A plastic abutment that is provided by the implant manufacturer will be used. This abutment will be modified using wax, and then it will be dismantled, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture. A plastic abutment that the implant manufacturer provides will be used. This abutment will be modified using wax, and then it will be dismantled, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture.

Other: Molded abutment

3D printed abutment

EXPERIMENTAL

The customised abutment will be made using a laser printer with a Cr-Co mixture after being designed using a special computer program.

Other: 3D printed abutment

Interventions

The waxed plastic abutment will dismantle, wedged, and poured using a Ni-Cr mixture then it will be trimmed to make it ready to make the permanent restoration over it. The prostheses will be cemented above the abutment using dual-cure resin cement then the final restoration (crown and abutment) will be fixed using a screw-retained manner.

Molded abutment

A marker or Scan body appropriate for the type of implant will be placed on the laboratory implant substitute, a digital scan of the marker will be done in the lab, and the scanned image will be transferred to a computer design software where the prosthesis is designed, In the printing phase, the final prosthesis will be manufactured using a stepwise metal powder supply and a laser fusion process. Making the abutment ready to make the permanent restoration over it. The prostheses will be cemented above the abutment using dual-cure resin cement then the final restoration (crown and abutment) will be fixed using a screw-retained manner.

3D printed abutment

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient's age is greater than 20 years and younger than 50
  • Good oral health
  • Absence of systemic diseases that may affect the healing of surrounding tissues, such as diabetes.

You may not qualify if:

  • The presence of non-functional habits such as stridor
  • Acute or acute periodontitis, previous loss of implants
  • Poor general health conditions
  • Previous radiotherapy in the head and neck area
  • Mental incompetence
  • Orthodontic treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Damascus

Damascus, Syria

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Barbin T, Veloso DV, Del Rio Silva L, Borges GA, Presotto AGC, Barao VAR, Mesquita MF. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Aug;108:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103821. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

    PMID: 32469723BACKGROUND
  • Bae S, Hong MH, Lee H, Lee CH, Hong M, Lee J, Lee DH. Reliability of Metal 3D Printing with Respect to the Marginal Fit of Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;13(21):4781. doi: 10.3390/ma13214781.

    PMID: 33114737BACKGROUND
  • Jang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

    PMID: 31027960BACKGROUND
  • Ramalho I, Witek L, Coelho PG, Bergamo E, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante EA. Influence of Abutment Fabrication Method on 3D Fit at the Implant-Abutment Connection. Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Nov/Dec;33(6):641-647. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6574.

    PMID: 33284906BACKGROUND
  • Chou WT, Chuang CC, Wang YB, Chiu HC. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257158. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34529710BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anodontia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Mohammad Anas Almodalal, DDS,MSc

    Department of fixed prosthodontics , Damascus University, Syria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohammad Luai Morad, DDS,MSc,PhD

    Department of fixed prosthodontics , Damascus University, Syria

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2022

First Posted

April 28, 2022

Study Start

September 2, 2020

Primary Completion

December 11, 2021

Study Completion

March 23, 2022

Last Updated

May 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations