NCT03029637

Brief Summary

Tooth replacement is a significant issue in the World. Such replacement is considered important by patients to improve aesthetics, function and quality of life. Tooth replacement is therefore a significant issue. Resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) are conservative and cost-effective tooth replacement option that involves minimal tooth preparation and are secured in place with an adhesive cement by bonding to the outer enamel layer of the tooth. Clinical reports of these prostheses at the University of Hong Kong shows some of the highest success rate and greatest longevity in the dental literature. However, a problem with this type of prosthesis in that it still needs some tooth preparation to accommodate the framework thickness of the bridge. In some patients with tooth wear, this may mean cutting through the enamel crown down into dentine which will weaken the tooth. In light of the tooth preparation some patients will refuse this treatment, in particular patients with dental drill phobias. The aim of this study is to investigate RBBs with tooth preparation and with no tooth preparation for the replacement of single missing teeth in a randomized controlled trial. However, a significant consequence of a no preparation RBB will mean that after cementation the prosthesis will interfere with the patient's bite, making the bridge prosthesis stand high. This will take time for the patient's original occlusion to re-establish itself by the movement of the tooth supporting the bridge. Despite the success of "supra-occluding" restoration has been reported in some studies, currently neither no preparation nor supraoccluding dental bridges are the standard of care for general dental practitioners and have not been reported on as a clinical trial in the literature. Most symptoms reported for supraoccluding restorations were transient and are reversible. The findings of this research will have significant impact on the teaching and practice for clinical prosthodontics and patient care worldwide. Patients will have a dental prosthesis that requires no dental drilling, no local anaesthetic and will have a stronger tooth supporting the bridge that should have greater longevity. More patients, in particular phobic patients will therefore seek treatment for tooth replacement with this conservative treatment option.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2016

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2017

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2021

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 18, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 30, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Resin bonded bridgesRandomized controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Prosthesis (resin bonded bridge RBB) retention/survival

    Presence of the prosthesis in patient's mouth (Yes/No) by clinical visual examination

    12 months

  • Prosthesis (resin bonded bridge RBB) retention/survival

    Presence of the prosthesis in patient's mouth (Yes/No) by clinical visual examination

    24 months

  • Prosthesis (resin bonded bridge RBB) retention/survival

    Presence of the prosthesis in patient's mouth (Yes/No) by clinical visual examination

    36 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Adverse events that related to no preparation/supra-occluding treatment approach

    Up to 36 months

  • Time taken to re-establish the occlusion

    Up to 36 months

  • Patient centered outcomes to the Prosthesis (I)

    36 months

  • Patient centered outcomes to the Prosthesis (II)

    36 months

  • Patient centered outcomes to the no preparation/supra-occluding treatment approach (I)

    Up to 12 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

No preparation resin bonded bridges

EXPERIMENTAL

RBBs with no or minimal preparation of their abutment teeth

Device: RBBs with no or minimal preparation of their abutment teeth

Routine resin bonded bridges

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

RBBs with routine tooth preparation of their abutment teeth

Device: RBBs with routine tooth preparation of their abutment teeth

Interventions

Placement of resin bonded bridges on teeth with no or minimal cutting of their supporting teeth

No preparation resin bonded bridges

Placement of resin bonded bridges on teeth after routine cutting of their supporting teeth

Routine resin bonded bridges

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • + years old
  • A complete bite on the supporting abutment tooth
  • At least one missing upper incisor
  • Controlled dental disease - no active caries or periodontal diseases
  • A minimum of 12 occluding pairs of natural teeth
  • Patients will be available to be clinically reviewed up to 3 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with uncontrolled active tooth decay or periodontal disease (i.e. 5+ mm probing depth and bleeding on probing).
  • Patients with teeth missing opposite to the planned RBB
  • Abutment tooth mobility of 2 or greater (Millers classification)
  • Patients with debilitating illnesses or complicating medical conditions
  • Heavily restored tooth abutment not suitable for an RBB
  • A supporting abutment with an open bite

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anodontia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth AbnormalitiesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesTooth DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2016

First Posted

January 24, 2017

Study Start

August 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

August 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations